LOOP DRAINAGE VERSUS CONVENTIONAL INCISION AND DRAINAGE TECHNIQUE IN CUTANEOUS ABSCESSES – A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Main Article Content
Keywords
Loop Drainage, Cutaneous, Abscess, Conventional, Incision, Adult, population
Abstract
Background: Cutaneous abscesses are increasingly frequent in adult and paediatric surgical emergency rooms. The treatment methods include conventional incision and drainage and secondary closure, primary closure with antimicrobial coverage, and loop incision, drainage.
Objective: To compare the short term outcomes after Loop Drainage of Cutaneous abscess versus conventional Incision and Drainage technique in the adult population.
Study design: Randomized controlled trial (no blinding).
Place and duration of study: Department of Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan from 30th November 2019 to 30th May 2020.
Methodology: Study was conducted on 256 participants. Participants were randomized in two groups in 1:1 ratio using lottery method. Group A included Conventional Incision and Drainage Technique which is Simple incision made at the most fluctuant part of the swelling. Group B was Loop Drainage Technique in which two small incisions were made at abscess edges, 3-5cm apart. Outcome variables including operative time, pain score, change in abscess diameter were recorded on proforma.
Results: Patients in group A had a mean age of 42.61±13.34 years, whereas those in group B had 41.80±14.79 years. Compared to group B, group A included 56 men (43.8%) and 72 females (56.3%). The mean operating time in group A was 16.49±1.12 min while in group B the mean operating time was 14.99±3.41 min (p<0.05). The mean pain score in group A was 4.28±1.79, whereas in group B the mean pain score was 6.00±1.47 (p-value=0.000). The mean diameter in abscess before drainage in group A was 3.35±1.04 while in group B the mean diameter of abscess before drainage was 3.51±1.17. The mean diameter in abscess after drainage in group A was 2.66±1.04 whereas in group B the mean diameter of abscess after drainage was 2.77±1.16. The change in diameter in abscess in group A was 0.68±0.10. On the other side in group B the mean change in diameter of abscess was 0.60±0.11 (p-value=0.000)
Conclusion: The loop drainage technique was found to have better outcome as compared to conventional incision and Drainage Technique. So, it is concluded that Loop Drainage Technique for Cutaneous abscess is a safe and effective technique in the adult population.
References
2. Gatti M, Gasparini LE, Grimaldi CM, Abbati D, Clemente S, Brioschi PR, et al. Septic shock due to NSTI caused by Actinomyces turicensis: the role of clinical pharmacology. Case report and review of the literature. Journal of Chemotherapy. 2017;29(6):372-5.
3. Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, Addrizzo-Harris D, Hylek EM, Phillips B, et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American College of Chest Physicians task force. Chest. 2006;129(1):174-81.
4. Simonsen SE, Van Orman E, Hatch B, Jones S, Gren L, Hegmann K, et al. Cellulitis incidence in a defined population. Epidemiology & Infection. 2006;134(2):293-9.
5. Schechter-Perkins EM, Dwyer KH, Amin A, Tyler MD, Liu J, Nelson KP, et al. Loop Drainage Is Noninferior to Traditional Incision and Drainage of Cutaneous Abscesses in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2020;27(11):1150-7.
6. Tsoraides SS, Pearl RH, Stanfill AB, Wallace LJ, Vegunta RK. Incision and loop drainage: a minimally invasive technique for subcutaneous abscess management in children. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2010;45(3):606-9.
7. Vinh DC, Embil JM. Rapidly progressive soft tissue infections. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2005;5(8):501-13.
8. Björnsdóttir S, Gottfredsson M, Thórisdóttir AS, Gunnarsson GB, Ríkardsdóttir H, Kristjánsson M, et al. Risk factors for acute cellulitis of the lower limb: a prospective case-control study. Clinical infectious diseases. 2005;41(10):1416-22.
9. Ki V, Rotstein C. Bacterial skin and soft tissue infections in adults: a review of their epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and site of care. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology. 2008;19(2):173-84.
10. Gabillot-Carré M, Roujeau J-C. Acute bacterial skin infections and cellulitis. Current opinion in infectious diseases. 2007;20(2):118-23.
11. Kowalski TJ, Berbari EF, Osmon DR, editors. Epidemiology, treatment, and prevention of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Mayo Clinic Proceedings; 2005: Elsevier.
12. Tsoraides SS, Pearl RH, Stanfill AB, Wallace LJ, Vegunta RK. Incision and loop drainage: a minimally invasive technique for subcutaneous abscess management in children. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2010;45(3):606-9.
13. Ladde JG, Baker S, Rodgers CN, Papa L. The LOOP technique: a novel incision and drainage technique in the treatment of skin abscesses in a pediatric ED. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2015;33(2):271-6.
14. Pastorino A, Tavarez MM. Incision and drainage. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
15. Özturan İU, Doğan NÖ, Karakayalı O, Özbek AE, Yılmaz S, Pekdemir M, et al. Comparison of loop and primary incision & drainage techniques in adult patients with cutaneous abscess: A preliminary, randomized clinical trial. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2017;35(6):830-4.
16. Ladd AP, Levy MS, Quilty J. Minimally invasive technique in treatment of complex, subcutaneous abscesses in children. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2010;45(7):1562-6.
17. McNamara WF, Hartin Jr CW, Escobar MA, Yamout SZ, Lau ST, Lee Y-H. An alternative to open incision and drainage for community-acquired soft tissue abscesses in children. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2011;46(3):502-6.
18. Gaszynski R, Punch G, Verschuer K. Loop and drain technique for subcutaneous abscess: a safe minimally invasive procedure in an adult population. ANZ journal of surgery. 2018;88(1-2):87-90.