IMPROVEMENT IN QOL FOR SURGICAL DECLINE PATIENTS POST PCI

Main Article Content

Hidayatullah
Ali Raza
Abidullah
Shama Ayaz
Ali Shanul Haq
Marjeena Khan
Murad Ali

Keywords

MacNew scale, PCI, QOL.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the improvement in quality of life (QOL) for surgical decline patients post PCI.


Materials and Methods:  This cross-sectional study enrolled a total of 98 patients and was conducted in [insert location] from August 2023 to January 2024. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A consisted of patients who underwent PCI, while Group B comprised control patients. All patients were followed up after 6 months. Data collection was conducted using the MacNew Heart Disease Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 25.


Results: The mean age of patients in group A and group B was 56.9±10.8 years and 55.16±11.2 years, respectively. The MacNew scale scores for both groups showing a significant p-value of <0.05 between the two groups.


Conclusion: The study concluded that patients who declined surgery and instead underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) experienced an improvement in their quality of life.

Abstract 27 | PDF Downloads 17

References

1. Ralapanawa U, Sivakanesan R. Epidemiology and the magnitude of coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome: a narrative review. Journal of epidemiology and global health. 2021;11(2):169.
2. Malik AB, Mir MA, Dar MA. Unchain Your Heart: Battling Coronary Artery Disease. International Journal of Current Research in Physiology and Pharmacology. 2023:24-38.
3. Khera S, Kolte D, Bhatt DL. Percutaneous coronary intervention. Translational research in coronary artery disease: Elsevier; 2016. p. 179-94.
4. Bhatt DL. Percutaneous coronary intervention in 2018. Jama. 2018;319(20):2127-8.
5. Epstein AJ, Polsky D, Yang F, Yang L, Groeneveld PW. Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008. Jama. 2011;305(17):1769-76.
6. Singh J, Kassis N, Ahuja KR, Sheth C, Verma BR, Saxena S, et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes Based on Decision‐Making Capacity. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021;10(17):e020609.
7. Lu Y, Zhang H, Wang Y, Zhou T, Welsh J, Liu J, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients without acute myocardial infarction in China: results from the China PEACE prospective study of percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA Network Open. 2018;1(8):e185446-e.
8. Hartley A, Nijjer S. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Patient Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Cardiovascular Interventions. 2022:233-48.
9. Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, Drachman DE, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017;69(11):e71-e126.
10. Moryś JM, Höfer S, Rynkiewicz A, Oldridge NB. The Polish MacNew heart disease heath-related quality of life questionnaire: A validation study. Cardiology Journal. 2015;22(5):541-50.
11. Alphin S, Höfer S, Perk J, Slørdahl S, Zwisler A-DO, Oldridge N. The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire: A scandinavian validation study. Social indicators research. 2015;122:519-37.
12. Friedrich O, Sipötz J, Benzer W, Kunschitz E, Höfer S. The dimensional structure of the MacNew health related quality of life questionnaire: a Mokken scale analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2015;79(1):43-8.
13. Vecchis RD, Ariano C. The MacNew questionnaire: A tool to predict unplanned rehospitalization after coronary revascularization. International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences. 2016;29(4):303-13.
14. Yazdani-Bakhsh R, Javanbakht M, Sadeghi M, Mashayekhi A, Ghaderi H, Rabiei K. Comparison of health-related quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery. ARYA atherosclerosis. 2016;12(3):124.
15. Lukkarinen H, Hentinen M. Assessment of quality of life with the Nottingham Health Profile among patients with coronary heart disease. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1997;26(1):73-84.
16. Luttik ML, Jaarsma T, Veeger N, van Veldhuisen DJ. Marital status, quality of life, and clinical outcome in patients with heart failure. Heart & lung. 2006;35(1):3-8.
17. Dueñas M, Ramirez C, Arana R, Failde I. Gender differences and determinants of health related quality of life in coronary patients: a follow-up study. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2011;11(1):1-11.
18. Unsar S, Sut N, Durna Z. Health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2007;22(6):501-7.
19. Durmaz T, Özdemir Ö, ÖZDEMİR BA, Keleş T, Bayram NA, Bozkurt E. Factors affecting quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2009;39(3):343-51.
20. Malakar AK, Choudhury D, Halder B, Paul P, Uddin A, Chakraborty S. A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors, and therapeutics. Journal of cellular physiology. 2019;234(10):16812-23.
21. Xue C, Bian L, Xie YS, Yin ZF, Xu ZJ, Chen QZ, et al. Impact of smoking on health-related quality of Life after percutaneous coronary intervention treated with drug-eluting stents: a longitudinal observational study. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2017;15(1):1-9.
22. Musthofa F, Trisyani Y, Mirwanti R. The Quality of Life Among Coronary Heart Disease Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Scoping Review. Malaysian Journal of Medicine & Health Sciences. 2022;18.
23. Haddock CK, Poston WS, Taylor JE, Conard M, Spertus J. Smoking and health outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. American heart journal. 2003;145(4):652-7.

Most read articles by the same author(s)