Evaluating Aesthetic Outcomes of Provisional Restoration Fabrication Techniques in Full Mouth Rehabilitation: An Updated Review

Main Article Content

Amrutha Shenoy
Vinay Sivaswamy
Subhabrata Maiti
Deepak Nallaswamy


Cone beam computed tomography, intraoral scanners, digital dentistry, full mouth rehabilitation


Statement of problem: Provisional restoration fabrication techniques are critical in Full Mouth Rehabilitation (FMR) procedures. Traditional techniques are widely used to fabricate provisional restorations for FMR. However, newer techniques such as intraoral scanners and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) have been introduced for data acquisition as alternatives to traditional methods. The effectiveness of these newer techniques in producing aesthetically pleasing provisional restorations for FMR remains unclear.
Aim: This review article aims to evaluate the aesthetic outcomes of provisional restoration fabrication techniques such as traditional conventional methods and newer ones like using intraoral scanners and CBCT for crown and bridge fabrication for Full Mouth Rehabilitation.
Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted using electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, from inception to April 2023. Studies that reported the aesthetic outcomes of provisional restoration fabrication techniques were included in the review. A clinical protocol was set up with the current available literature.
Results: The majority of the studies evaluating the aesthetic outcomes of traditional techniques reported satisfactory results. However, studies evaluating newer techniques such as intraoral scanners and CBCT were limited.
Conclusion: The use of newer techniques such as intraoral scanners and CBCT as data acquisition methods is gaining popularity, and the available studies suggest that they produce comparable or superior aesthetic outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine the optimal technique for provisional restoration fabrication in FMR. 

Abstract 342 | PDF Downloads 185


1. Ponnanna AA, Maiti S, Rai N, et al. Three-dimensional-Printed Malo Bridge: Digital Fixed Prosthesis for the Partially Edentulous
Maxilla. Contemp Clin Dent 2021; 12: 451–453.
2. Merchant A, Ganapathy DM, Maiti S. Effectiveness of local and topical anesthesia during gingival retraction. Brazilian Dental Science 2022; 25: e2591.
3. Aparna J, Maiti S, Jessy P. Polyether ether ketone - As an alternative biomaterial for Metal Richmond crown-3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Conserv Dent 2021; 24: 553–557.
4. Agarwal S, Ashok V, Maiti S. Open- or Closed-Tray Impression Technique in Implant Prosthesis: A Dentist’s Perspective. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2020; 30: 193–198.
5. Maiti S, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, et al. Correlation of soft tissue biotype with pink aesthetic score in single full veneer crown. Bioinformation 2020; 16: 1139–1144.
6. Maiti S, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, et al. Data on dental bite materials with stability and displacement under load. Bioinformation 2020; 16: 1145–1151.
7. Kazis H, Kazis AJ. Complete mouth rehabilitation through fixed partial denture prosthodontics. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1960; 10: 296–303.
8. Muthu MS, Prathibha KM. Management of a child with autism and severe bruxism: a case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2008; 26: 82–84.
9. Hammad IA, Nassif NJ, Salameh ZA. Full-mouth rehabilitation following treatment of temporomandibular disorders and teeth-related signs and symptoms. Cranio 2005; 23: 289–296.
10. Tiwari B, Ladha K, Lalit A, et al. Occlusal concepts in full mouth rehabilitation: an overview. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2014; 14: 344–351.
11. Guichet NF. Biologic laws governing functions of muscles that move the mandible. Part I. Occlusal programming. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1977; 37: 648–656.
12. Ismail YH, Arthur George W. The consistency of the swallowing technique in determining occlusal vertical relation in edentulous patients. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1968; 19: 230–236.
13. Kazis H. Functional aspects of complete mouth rehabilitation. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1954; 4: 833–841.
14. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, et al. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1752–1754.
15. Academy of Prosthodontics. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. Mosby Journal Reprint Department, 1994.
16. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms Seventh Edition (GPT-7). The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1999; 81: 48–110.
17. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth Edition. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 117: e1–e105.
18. Grippo JO. Abfractions: a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3: 14–19.
19. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Stress-induced cervical lesions: review of advances in the past 10 years. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75: 487–494.
20. Smith BG, Knight JK. An index for measuring the wear of teeth. Br Dent J 1984; 156: 435–438.
21. Smith BG, Bartlett DW, Robb ND. The prevalence, etiology and management of tooth wear in the United Kingdom. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 367–372.
22. Järvinen V, Rytömaa I, Meurman JH. Location of Dental Erosion in a Referred Population. Caries Research 1992; 26: 391–396.
23. Järvinen VK, Rytömaa II, Heinonen OP. Risk factors in dental erosion. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 942–947.
24. Johansson A, Fareed K, Omar R. Analysis of possible factors influencing the occurrence of occlusal tooth wear in a young Saudi population. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1991; 49: 139–145.
25. Loomans B, Opdam N, Attin T, et al. Severe Tooth Wear: European Consensus Statement on Management Guidelines. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19: 111–119.
26. Wetselaar P, Lobbezoo F. The tooth wear evaluation system: a modular clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management planning of worn dentitions. J Oral Rehabil 2016; 43: 69–80.
27. Shanbhag, VKL., Keluskar, V., Naik, S., Karpe, T., & Srinivasan, SR. (2014). Tooth wear: prevalence and associated factors in rural areas of Maharashtra, India. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 25(4), 463-468.
28. Sarode, SC., Sarode, GS., Ingale, Y., Patil, A., Anand, R., & Unadkat, H. (2019). Oral submucous fibrosis and tooth wear: a review. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry, 10(1), e12390.
29. Shafer WG, Hine MK, Levy BM. A Textbook of Oral Pathology. 1958.
30. Verrett RG. Analyzing the etiology of an extremely worn dentition. J Prosthodont 2001; 10: 224–233.
31. Dawson PE. Functional Occlusion - E-Book: From TMJ to Smile Design. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2006.
32. Turner KA, Missirlian DM. Restoration of the extremely worn dentition. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 467–474.
33. Thirumurthy VR, Bindhoo YA, Jacob SJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of occlusal wear: a case report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013; 13: 366–372.
34. Stevens CJ. A segmented approach to full-mouth rehabilitation. Dent Today 2012; 31: 106, 108–12.
35. Hobo S, Takayama H. Oral Rehabilitation: Clinical Determination of Occlusion. Quintessence Publishing (IL), 1997.
36. Chander NG, Gopi Chander N, Venkat R. An Appraisal on Increasing the Occlusal Vertical Dimension in Full Occlusal Rehabilitation and its Outcome. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2011; 11: 77–81.
37. Hobo S. Twin-tables technique for occlusal rehabilitation: Part II—Clinical procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1991; 66: 471–477.
38. Hobo S, Takayama H. Oral Rehabilitation: Clinical Determination of Occlusion. Quintessence Publishing Company, 1997.
39. Nallaswamy D. Textbook of Prosthodontics. JP Medical Ltd, 2017.
40. Lee J-H, Kim S-H, Han J-S, et al. Contemporary full-mouth rehabilitation using a digital smile design in combination with conventional and computer-aided design/manufacturing restorative materials in a patient with bruxism: A case report. Medicine 2019; 98: e18164.
41. Utz K-H, Lückerath W, Schwarting P, et al. Is there ‘a best’ centric relation record? Centric relation records, condyle positions, and their practical significance. Int J Prosthodont. Epub ahead of print 6 December 2022. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.7786.
42. Stafeev A, Ryakhovsky A, Petrov P, et al. Comparative Analysis of the Reproduction Accuracy of Main Methods for Finding the Mandible Position in the Centric Relation Using Digital Research Method. Comparison between Analog-to-Digital and Digital Methods: A Preliminary Report. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 17. Epub ahead of print 3 February 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17030933.
43. Lucchini JP, Lavigne J, Spirgi M, et al. [The centric relation. IV. Variations in condylar positions according to the methods of measuring centric relation and to the patient’s clinical type]. SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd 1978; 88: 1–12.
44. Ash MM, Ramfjord SP. An Introduction to Functional Occlusion. W.B. Saunders Company, 1982.
45. McNamara Jr. JA, Seligman DA, Okeson JP. Centric relation: A historical and contemporary orthodontic perspective. J Orofac Pain.
46. Gupta A, Tripathi A, Trivedi C, et al. A study to evaluate the effect of different mandibular horizontal and vertical jaw positions on sleep parameters in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Quintessence Int 2016; 47: 661–666.
47. Chakfa AM. The Effect of Altering the Vertical Dimension of Occlusion on Isometric Strength of Cervical Flexors and Deltoid Muscles. 1998.
48. Rios CM. An Study of the Vertical Dimension and Centric Relation: Thesis Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment ... Prosthetic Dentistry. 1956.
49. Saeidi Pour R, Engler MLPD, Edelhoff D, et al. A patient-calibrated individual wax-up as an essential tool for planning and creating a patient-oriented treatment concept for pathological tooth wear. Int J Esthet Dent 2018; 13: 476–492.
50. Fabbri G, Cannistraro G, Pulcini C, et al. The full-mouth mock-up: a dynamic diagnostic approach (DDA) to test function and esthetics in complex rehabilitations with increased vertical dimension of occlusion. Int J Esthet Dent 2018; 13: 460–474.
51. Lempel E, Németh KG, Lovász BV, et al. Adhesive Management of Anterior Tooth Wear in Combination with the Dahl Concept-A 27-Month Observational Case Series. Oper Dent 2021; 46: 594–608.
52. Shopova D, Mladenov K. Case Report: A digital workflow in the treatment of bruxism in a young patient. F1000Res 2021; 10: 894.
53. Kurbad A. CAD/CAM-based polymer provisionals as treatment adjuncts. Int J Comput Dent 2013; 16: 327–346.
54. Edelhoff D, Beuer F, Schweiger J, et al. CAD/CAM-generated high-density polymer restorations for the pretreatment of complex cases: a case report. Quintessence Int 2012; 43: 457–467.
55. Jahangiri L, Jang S. Onlay partial denture technique for assessment of adequate occlusal vertical dimension: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 1–4.
56. Kang D-O, Yu H-S, Choi S-H, et al. Stability of vertical dimension following total arch intrusion. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23: 164.
57. Blasi Á, Henarejos-Domingo V, Palacios-Bañuelos R, et al. Comparison accuracy of digital and analog method using milled occlusal splints. J Esthet Restor Dent. Epub ahead of print 21 March 2023. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13039.
58. Goob J, Prandtner O, Schweiger J, et al. Digital jaw relation recording to evaluate a new vertical dimension of occlusion using CAD/CAM-fabricated tooth-colored splints: a case report. Int J Comput Dent 2023; 0: 0.
59. Diduch E. The Effects of Altered Vertical Dimension Splints on Parafunction, Myofacial Pain Dysfunction and Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction: Y Evelyn Diduch. 2001.
60. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 1981.
61. Gupta S, Setia V. Provisional Restorations in Fixed Prosthodontics. 2013.
62. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. Mosby, 2016.
63. Wang R. An in Vitro Evaluation of Selected Resins for Provisional Restorations. 1988.
64. Weintraub GS, Zinner ID. The Dental Clinics of North America: Provisional restorations. 1989.
65. Oliva GS. Mechanical Properties of Provisional Restorative Materials. 2010.
66. Shenoy A, Rajaraman V, Maiti S. Comparative analysis of various temporary computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing polymethyl methacrylate crown materials based on color stability, flexural strength, and surface roughness: An study. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2022; 13: S130–S135.
67. Young HM, Smith CT, Morton D. Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 129–132.
68. Idrissi HA, Annamma LM, Sharaf D, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Four Different Types of Provisional Restoration Materials: An In Vitro Pilot Study. Children; 10. Epub ahead of print 15 February 2023. DOI: 10.3390/children10020380.
69. Digholkar S, Madhav VNV, Palaskar J. Evaluation of the flexural strength and microhardness of provisional crown and bridge materials fabricated by different methods. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2016; 16: 328–334.
70. Patil et al. P. Comparison of flexural strength of provisional crown and bridge materials. J Indian Prosthodont Soc.
71. al. AR et. Flexural strength of provisional crown and bridge materials: methacrylate vs. bis-acryl composite resin. J Adv Prosthodont.
72. Beloti et al EC. Effect of polishing systems on the surface temperature rise of bis-acrylic composite resins during simulated intraoral adjustment procedures. J Prosthet Dent.
73. Reis et al A. Influence of finishing and polishing on the surface roughness and temperature of bis-acryl composite resins. J Prosthet Dent.
74. Cruz et al. RC. In vitro cytotoxicity and biocompatibility evaluation of a bis-acrylic composite resin used for interim restorations. J Prosthet Dent.
75. Borges et al AF. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of provisional bis-acrylic composite resins. J Prosthet Dent.
76. Craig RLSA. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of dental resin composites. Powers in The Journal of Dental Materials, 1999.
77. Ferracane JL. Polymerization shrinkage of dental composites: what do we need to know? Dent Assist.
78. Zaruba, M., Husson, J. L., & Behr, M. (2016). Influence of Temporary Crown Materials on the Adhesion of Streptococcus Mutans. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 116(5), 768-775 https://doi.org/101016/j.prosdent201604022, Zaruba, M., Husson, J. L., & Behr, M. (2016). n.d. ‘Influence of Temporary Crown Materials on the Adhesion of Streptococcus Mutans.’ The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 116(5), 768-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.022.
79. al. EP et. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to bis-GMA- and UDMA-based dental composite resins. J Appl Oral Sci.
80. Alhazzazi et al. T. Marginal fit of interim restorations fabricated from two provisional materials: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent.
81. Al TBÖ. Marginal fit of interim crowns fabricated from four different materials before and after cementation. J Prosthet Dent.
82. Paravina et al. R. Color stability and translucency of provisional resin materials after accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent.
83. al. RH et. Colour stability of interim resin materials. The Journal of Dentistry, 2015.
84. Yao Q, Morton D, Eckert GJ, et al. The effect of surface treatments on the color stability of CAD-CAM interim fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 126: 248–253.
85. Almejrad L, Yang C-C, Morton D, et al. The Effects of Beverages and Surface Treatments on the Color Stability of 3D-Printed Interim Restorations. J Prosthodont 2022; 31: 165–170.
86. Köroğlu A, Sahin O, Dede DÖ, et al. Effect of different surface treatment methods on the surface roughness and color stability of interim prosthodontic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 447–455.
87. Ellakany P, Fouda SM, AlGhamdi MA, et al. Comparison of the color stability and surface roughness of 3-unit provisional fixed partial dentures fabricated by milling, conventional and different 3D printing fabrication techniques. J Dent 2023; 131: 104458.
88. Arora O, Ahmed N, Maiti S. Comparison of the marginal accuracy of metal copings fabricated by 3D-printed resin and milled polymethyl methacrylate - An study. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2022; 13: S238–S242.
89. Giannetti L, Apponi R, Mordini L, et al. The occlusal precision of milled versus printed provisional crowns. J Dent 2022; 117: 103924.
90. Kane B, Shah KC. In Vitro Analysis of Shear Stress: CAD Milled vs Printed Denture Base Resins with Bonded Denture Tooth. J Prosthodont 2023; 32: 29–37.
91. Sailer I, Fehmer V, Pjetursson BE. Fixed Restorations: A Clinical Guide to the Selection of Materials and Fabrication Technology. Quintessenz Verlag, 2021.
92. Tinschert, J., Natt, G., Mautsch, W., Augthun, M., & Spiekermann, H. (2001). Evaluation of thermal and mechanical loading of three types of temporary crown materials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 85(2), 186-193 https://doi.org/101067/mpr2001112132.
93. Aljabbari, Y. S., & AlZain, S. A. (2017). Flexural strength of provisional crown and bridge materials: A comparative study. The Saudi Dental Journal, 29(4), 185-189 https://doi.org/101016/j.sdentj201702004.
94. Moradinezhad, M., Razavi, M., & Ahrari, F. (2018). Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage of temporary restorative materials. J Contemp Dent Pract.
95. Juntavee N, Juntavee A, Srisontisuk S. Color Appearance of Various Provisional Restorative Materials for Rehabilitation Upon Aging. Eur J Dent. Epub ahead of print 11 January 2023. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759886.
96. Alam M, Chugh A, Kumar A, et al. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of anterior provisional restorations fabricated using conventional and digital techniques - An study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2022; 22: 361–367.
97. Jafar Abdulla MU, Dafer Al Wadei MH, El-Patal MA-E, et al. Assessment of Marginal Integrity and Color Stability of Provisional Restoration Fabricated from Different Autopolymerizing Acrylic Resins - A Comparative Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2021; 13: S616–S619.
98. Izdebska-Podsiadły J. Polymers for 3D Printing: Methods, Properties, and Characteristics. William Andrew, 2022.
99. Ellakany P, Fouda SM, Mahrous AA, et al. Influence of CAD/CAM Milling and 3D-Printing Fabrication Methods on the Mechanical Properties of 3-Unit Interim Fixed Dental Prosthesis after Thermo-Mechanical Aging Process. Polymers ; 14. Epub ahead of print 30 September 2022. DOI: 10.3390/polym14194103.
100. Kamio T, Kawai T. CBCT Images to an STL Model: Exploring the ‘Critical Factors’ to Binarization Thresholds in STL Data Creation. Diagnostics (Basel); 13. Epub ahead of print 1 March 2023. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13050921.
101. Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C. Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Principles, Techniques and Clinical Applications. Springer, 2018.
102. de Freitas BN, Mendonça LM, Cruvinel PB, et al. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing. J Dent 2023; 128: 104387.
103. Kapila SD. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: Indications, Insights, and Innovations. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
104. Patel S, Harvey S, Shemesh H, et al. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics. Quintessenz Verlag, 2019.
105. Jain P, Gupta M. Digitization in Dentistry: Clinical Applications. Springer Nature, 2021.
106. Luo T, Zhang J, Fan L, et al. A digital workflow with the virtual enamel evaluation and
stereolithographic template for accurate tooth preparation to conservatively manage a case of complex exogenous dental erosion. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022; 34: 733–740.
107. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 106–114.
108. Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, et al. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 187–195.
109. Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, et al. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44: 20140224.
110. White SC, Pharoah MJ. White and Pharoah’s Oral Radiology E-Book: Principles and Interpretation. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2018.
111. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 707–30, v.
112. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 265–273.
113. Website, Yuzbasioglu, E., & Kurt, H. (2020). Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, 54(3), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.26650/JIÜFD.2020.0031.
114. Website, Patzelt, S. B. M., Emmanouilidi, A., Stampf, S., Strub, J. R., & Att, W. (2014). Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clinical oral investigations, 18(6), 1687-1694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1169-3.
115. Website, Kihara, H., Takahashi, H., Hattori, T., & Sasaki, K. (2019). Review of Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Reproducibility, and Clinical Implications. Dental materials journal, 38(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-284.
116. Website, Ahlholm, P., Sipilä, K., Vallittu, P., & Jakonen, M. (2020). Digital intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of recent literature. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8840218.
117. Masri R, Driscoll CF. Clinical Applications of Digital Dental Technology. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
118. Ovsianikov A, Yoo J, Mironov V. 3D Printing and Biofabrication. Springer, 2017. 119. Zhivago P, Turkyilmaz I, Yun S. Aesthetic and functional rehabilitation of collapsed occlusal vertical dimension using an advanced digital workflow. Prim Dent J 2023; 12: 57–61.
120. Chochlidakis K, Romeo D, Ercoli C, et al. Complete Digital Workflow for Prosthesis Prototype Fabrication with the Double Digital Scanning (DDS) Technique: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae. J Prosthodont 2022; 31: 761–765.
121. Sanchez-Lara A, Hosney S, Lampraki E, et al. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single crowns manufactured with an analog workflow and three CAD-CAM systems: A prospective clinical study. J Prosthodont. Epub ahead of print 8 March 2023. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13675.
122. Abdeen L, Chen Y-W, Kostagianni A, et al. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022; 34: 1238–1246.
123. Cons NC. DAI--the Dental Aesthetic Index. Health Quest, 1986.
124. Shammi R, Mathur S, Sandhu M. Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI). 2017.
125. Merchant A, Maiti S, Rajaraman V, et al. Comparative analysis of pink and white esthetics of anterior full veneer crown: Indian scenario. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2022; 13: S282–S287.
126. Prause E, Hey J, Sterzenbach G, et al. Survival and success of veneered zirconia crowns: A 10-year follow up study. Int J Comput Dent 2023; 0: 0.
127. Esmaeili S, Mohammadi NM, Khosravani S, et al. Evaluation of facial profile characteristics of aesthetically pleasing Iranian faces. J World Fed Orthod 2023; 12: 76–89.
128. Davoudi A, Salimian K, Tabesh M, et al. Relation of CAD/CAM zirconia dental implant abutments with periodontal health and final aesthetic aspects; A systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent 2023; 15: e64–e70.
129. Kao C-T, Liu S-H, Kao C-Y, et al. Clinical evaluation of 3D-printed zirconia crowns fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) for posterior teeth restorations: Short-term pilot study. J Dent Sci 2023; 18: 715–721.
130. Deniz D, Aktas G, Guncu MB. A randomized clinical trial of monolithic single tooth crowns: One Year preliminary results. Int J Prosthodont. Epub ahead of print 23 November 2022. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.8269.
131. Hanan SA, Cohen-Carneiro F, Herkrath FJ, et al. Validation of the brazilian version of the oral health impact profile - Aesthetic questionnaire. Braz Dent J 2022; 33: 77–86.
132. Øzhayat EB. Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 907–913.
133. Carlsson V, Hakeberg M, Blomkvist K, et al. Orofacial esthetics and dental anxiety: associations with oral and psychological health. Acta Odontol Scand 2014; 72: 707–713.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>