PROFESSIONALISM AND THE DIGITAL FRONTIER: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF DENTAL RESIDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE OF DIGITAL PRIVACY AND LEGAL LIABILITY IN PESHAWAR
Main Article Content
Keywords
Digital professionalism; Dental residents; Patient privacy; Clinical photography; Social media; Qualitative research.
Abstract
Background: Professionalism in dentistry is increasingly challenged by the widespread use of mobile technology in clinical practice. In dental teaching hospitals, smartphones are commonly used for clinical photography, consultation, and academic discussion. However, these practices may pose risks to patient confidentiality and data security, particularly when healthcare professionals are unaware of relevant medicolegal regulations.
Objective: To explore dental residents’ perceptions, knowledge, and practices regarding digital privacy, informed consent, and legal liability related to clinical photography and social media use.
Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted in major dental teaching hospitals in Peshawar from November 2024 to April 2025. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 senior dental residents recruited through purposive sampling. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. NVivo 14 software was used to organize and manage the data. A total of 60 initial codes were identified, which were grouped into 20 sub-themes and categorized into five major themes.
Results: Five major themes emerged from the analysis: Digital Documentation for Education, Consent and Anonymity Ambiguity, Institutional Guideline Vacuum, Legal Knowledge Deficit, and The Social Media Paradox. Residents frequently used smartphones for clinical documentation and consultation but demonstrated limited understanding of legal regulations governing patient confidentiality and digital privacy.
Conclusion: Dental residents in Peshawar frequently prioritize educational and clinical convenience over digital privacy considerations. The absence of institutional policies and limited medicolegal awareness creates potential risks for patient confidentiality breaches. Integrating digital professionalism training and institutional guidelines into dental education is essential.
References
2. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
3. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
4. Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. Pharm Ther. 2014;39(7):491-520.
5. Greysen SR, Kind T, Chretien KC. Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(11):1227-1229. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1447-1
6. Holden AC. Social media and professionalism in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2017;223(6):421-424. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.789
7. McKee R, Porter J. Ethical issues in medical photography. Med Educ. 2008;42(2):210-211. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02929.x
8. Farnan JM, Snyder Sulmasy L, Worster BK, Chaudhry HJ, Rhyne JA, Arora VM. Online medical professionalism. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(8):620-627. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00100
9. George DR, Rovniak LS, Kraschnewski JL. Dangers and opportunities for social media in medicine. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;56(3):453-462. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e318297dc38
10. Wallace S, Clark M, White J. “It's on my iPhone”: attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001099. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001099
11. Robinson L, Kersey J. Novel electronic technologies in medical education. Med Educ. 2008;42(9):925-927.
12. Henry RK, Molnar A. Examination of social media professionalism policies. J Dent Educ. 2013;77(5):620-622.
13. Thompson LA, Dawson K, Ferdig R, Black EW, Boyer J, Coutts J, et al. The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):954-957.
14. Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, Kind T. Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1309-1315.
15. Kind T, Genrich G, Sodhi A, Chretien KC. Social media policies at US medical schools. JAMA. 2010;304(9):1031-1032.
16. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of healthcare: systematic review of social media use. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85.
17. Kane GC, Fichman RG, Gallaugher J, Glaser J. The power of social media in healthcare. Health Aff. 2014;33(2):212-218.
18. Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, Terry CL, Helft PR. The patient-doctor relationship and online social networks. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(10):1168-1174.
19. General Medical Council. Confidentiality: good practice in handling patient information. London: GMC; 2017.
20. British Medical Association. Using social media: practical and ethical guidance. London: BMA; 2018.
21. World Medical Association. WMA statement on professional and ethical use of social media. Geneva: WMA; 2019.
22. Gagnon K, Sabus C. Professionalism in a digital age. J Allied Health. 2015;44(3):165-171.
23. Guseh JS, Brendel RW, Brendel DH. Medical professionalism in the age of online social networking. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(9):584-586.
24. Thompson DF, Lohani S. The role of mobile technology in healthcare education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(7):130.
25. Patel R, Chang T, Greysen SR, Chopra V. Social media use in chronic disease management. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;1:3.
26. Wilkinson A, Ashcroft J, Patel A. Digital professionalism in medical education. Clin Teach. 2018;15(6):467-471.
27. Guraya SY. The usage of social networking sites by medical students for educational purposes. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2016;11(3):268-273.
28. Househ M. The use of social media in healthcare: organizational, clinical, and patient perspectives. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;183:244-248.
29. Chretien KC, Tuck MG. Addressing professionalism in the digital age. Med Teach. 2015;37(11):1013-1014.
30. Mesko B. Social media in clinical practice. Springer; 2017.
31. O’Sullivan AJ, Toohey SM. Teaching professionalism in the digital era. Med Educ. 2008;42(3):258-259.
32. Campbell L, Evans Y, Pumper M, Moreno MA. Social media use by physicians. JAMA. 2016;316(19):2017-2018.
33. Chan WSY, Leung AY. Use of social network sites for communication among health professionals. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e117.
34. Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. Singapore: Springer; 2019.
35. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2018.

