EARLY TREATMENT EFFICIENCY, COMFORT, AND PATIENT-REPORTED EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE TYPES IN ADULT PATIENTS IN PESHAWAR: A MULTI-CENTER CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Orthodontic appliances, clear aligners, ceramic brackets, treatment efficiency, patient-reported outcomes, cross-sectional study.
Abstract
Background:
Adult orthodontic treatment demand has increased in urban Pakistan. Appliance selection influences early treatment efficiency indicators and patient-reported experience. This study compared mechanical performance indicators and psychosocial outcomes among adult patients treated with different orthodontic appliances.
Methods:
This multi-center comparative cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2024 to August 2025 across four tertiary dental institutions in Peshawar. A total of 440 adult patients (18–45 years) in the active alignment phase (3–9 months) were included. Appliance-related complications were recorded at the time of clinical assessment. Pain intensity was measured using a 0–100 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Gingival health was assessed using the Löe and Silness Gingival Index. Psychosocial measures were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale. One-way ANOVA and Chi-square tests were used. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
Clear aligners demonstrated the lowest hardware-related complication frequency (4.1%) compared to metal brackets (12.8%) and ceramic braces (34.2%) (p < 0.001). Mean pain scores were significantly lower in aligner users (21.4) compared to metal (62.5) and ceramic systems (68.3) (p < 0.001). Gingival health scores were significantly better among aligner users (p < 0.01). Social confidence ratings were highest in the aligner group (93%).
Conclusion:
In this multi-center cross-sectional study, clear aligners were associated with lower complication frequency and improved early-stage patient-reported outcomes compared to fixed orthodontic appliances. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine long-term treatment efficiency.
References
2. Scribante A, Pascadopoli M, Gandini P, et al. Metallic vs Ceramic Bracket Failures After 12 Months of Treatment: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Int Dent J. 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.04.023
3. Cardoso PC, Espinosa DG, Mecenas P, Flores-Mir C, Normando D. Pain level between clear aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review. Prog Orthod. 2020;21:3. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0303-z
4. Pereira D, Machado V, Botelho J, Delgado AS. Comparison of Pain Perception between Clear Aligners and Fixed Appliances: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Appl Sci. 2020;10(12):4276. doi: 10.3390/app10124276
5. Di Spirito F, D’Ambrosio F, Cannatà D, et al. Impact of Clear Aligners versus Fixed Appliances on Periodontal Status: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11:1340. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091340
6. Oikonomou E, Koletsi D, Iliadi A, Eliades T. Impact of Aligners and Fixed Appliances on Oral Health during Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2021. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b2403661
7. Kaklamanos EG, Athanasiou AE, et al. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life throughout Treatment with Clear Aligners vs Conventional Metal Fixed Appliances: A Systematic Review. Dent J. 2023. doi: 10.3390/dj11020039
8. Papageorgiou SN, Koletsi D, Iliadi A, Peltomäki T, Eliades T. Treatment outcome with orthodontic aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42:331-343. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz094
9. Roulias P, et al. Effect of aligners on oral health-related quality of life and anxiety: a prospective study. BMC Psychol. 2024. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01834-2
10. Giannini L, Galbiati G, Tartaglia FC, et al. Orthodontic Treatment with Fixed Appliances Versus Aligners: Periodontal Aspects. Dentistry Journal. 2025;13(2):70. doi: 10.3390/dj13020070
11. Iliadi A, Koletsi D, Eliades T. Forces and moments generated by aligner-type appliances: systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22:248-258. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12333
12. Iliadi A, Koletsi D, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T. Safety considerations for thermoplastic aligners/retainers: systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials (Basel). 2020;13:1843. doi: 10.3390/ma13081843
13. Papadopoulou AK, Cantele A, Polychronis G, Zinelis S, Eliades T. Changes in Invisalign appliances after 1–2 weeks use. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:2406. doi: 10.3390/ma12152406
14. Tektas S, Thurnheer T, Eliades T, Attin T, Karygianni L. Initial bacterial adhesion on aligner materials. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020;9:908. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9120908
15. Gujar AN, et al. Cytokine levels in GCF during aligners vs fixed appliances: 3-week study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77:474-481. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2019.1607548
16. Ke Y, Zhu Y, Zhu M. Treatment effectiveness: clear aligner vs fixed appliances. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19:24. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0710-8
17. Almagrami I, et al. 3D comparison of alveolar bone/root resorption: aligners vs fixed. Prog Orthod. 2023;24:6. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00450-6
18. Mummolo S, Nota A, Albani F, et al. Salivary levels of S. mutans/Lactobacilli: aligners vs fixed. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0228798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228798
19. Shokeen B, et al. Fixed appliances vs aligners and the oral microbiome: longitudinal comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161:e475-e485. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.08.025
20. Contaldo M, Lucchese A, et al. Oral microbiota changes in orthodontic patients. J Clin Med. 2021;10:780. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040780

