OPPORTUNISTIC INFECTION OF MUCORMYCOSIS DURING COVID-19 AND ITS CLINICO-MYCOLOGICAL PROFILE AND ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERNS.

Main Article Content

Dr Manish Pokra
Dr Aaesha Khanam
Dr Harshita Upadhyay
Dr Ranu Suthar

Keywords

...................

Abstract

A serious opportunistic fungal illness, zygomycosis has become more common during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in immunocompromised people like those with diabetes mellitus. The current study's objective is to assess the clinico-mycological profile of mucormycosis and identify patterns of antifungal susceptibility, including the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of widely used antifungal medications. There were fifty clinical isolates that tested positive for mucormycosis. Samples were taken from lung and brain tissues, wounds, nasal swabs, bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial wash, and paranasal sinuses. Gene sequencing, microscopy, and culture were used for identification. The CLSI M38-A2 broth microdilution method was used to test for antifungal susceptibility to itraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B. The most common isolate (83%) was Rhizopus spp., followed by Apophysomyces variabilis (7%), Lichtheimia corymbifera (7%), and Cunninghamella bertholletiae (2%). Among the antifungal drugs under investigation, amphotericin B demonstrated the greatest efficacy, followed by posaconazole. Voriconazole and itraconazole were mainly unsuccessful. Mucormycosis remains a potentially fatal illness, particularly in individuals with diabetes and a history of COVID-19. The most frequent etiological agent is still Rhizopus spp. The antifungal drugs posaconazole and amphotericin B are thought to be the most likely to work, highlighting the significance of regular susceptibility testing for the best possible treatment results.

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

References

1. Azhar A, Khan WH, Khan PA, Alhosaini K, Owais M, Ahmad A. Mucormycosis and COVID-19 pandemic: Clinical and diagnostic approach. J Infect Public Health. 2022 Apr;15(4):466-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Feb 18. PMID: 35216920; PMCID: PMC8855610.
2. Brown J. Zygomycosis: an emerging fungal infection. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Dec 15;62(24):2593-6. doi: 10.2146/ajhp050188. PMID: 16333056.3. Ahmadikia K, Hashemi SJ, Khodavaisy S, Getso MI, Alijani N, Badali H, et al. The double‐edged sword of systemic corticosteroid therapy in viral pneumonia: a case report and comparative review of influenza‐associated mucormycosis versus COVID‐19 associated mucormycosis. Mycoses. 2021;64(8):798–808.
3. Rais N, Ahmad R, Ved A, Parveen K, Bari DG, Prakash O. Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA), a Leading Risk Factor for Mucormycosis (Black Fungus), during the Era of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19): An Overview. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2023;19(1):e150322202260. doi: 10.2174/1573399818666220315162424. PMID: 35293299.
4. Singh AK, Singh R, Joshi SR, Misra A. Mucormycosis in COVID-19: A systematic review of cases reported worldwide and in India. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 Jul-Aug;15(4):102146. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.05.019. Epub 2021 May 21. PMID: 34192610; PMCID: PMC8137376.
5. Chakrabarti A, Singh R. Mucormycosis in India: unique features. Mycoses. 2014 Dec;57 Suppl 3:85-90. doi: 10.1111/myc.12243. Epub 2014 Sep 3. PMID: 25187095.
6. Rüping MJ, Heinz WJ, Kindo AJ, Rickerts V, Lass-Flörl C, Beisel C, Herbrecht R, Roth Y, Silling G, Ullmann AJ, Borchert K, Egerer G, Maertens J, Maschmeyer G, Simon A, Wattad M, Fischer G, Vehreschild JJ, Cornely OA. Forty-one recent cases of invasive zygomycosis from a global clinical registry. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Feb;65(2):296-302. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp430. Epub 2009 Dec 11. PMID: 20008047.
7. Lynch JP 3rd, Fishbein MC, Abtin F, Zhanel GG. Part 1: Mucormycosis: prevalence, risk factors, clinical features, and diagnosis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2023 Jul-Dec;21(7):723-736. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2023.2220964. Epub 2023 Jun 7. PMID: 37262298.
8. Riley TT, Muzny CA, Swiatlo E, Legendre DP. Breaking the Mold: A Review of Mucormycosis and Current Pharmacological Treatment Options. Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Sep;50(9):747-57. doi: 10.1177/1060028016655425. Epub 2016 Jun 15. PMID: 27307416.
9. Alastruey-Izquierdo A, et al. 2009. Activity of posaconazole and other antifungal agents against Mucorales strains identified by sequencing of internal transcribed spacers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:1686–1689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Klepser M. The value of amphotericin B in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. J Crit Care. 2011 Apr;26(2):225.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Oct 15. PMID: 20951541.
11. Gomez-Lopez A. Antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: focus on drugs without a clear recommendation. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(11):1481–7.
12. Almyroudis NG, Sutton DA, Fothergill AW, Rinaldi MG, Kusne S. In vitro susceptibilities of 217 clinical isolates of zygomycetes to conventional and new antifungal agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Jul;51(7):2587-90. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00452-07. Epub 2007 Apr 23. PMID: 17452481; PMCID: PMC1913247.
13. Cornely OA, Vehreschild JJ, Rüping MJ. Current experience in treating invasive zygomycosis with posaconazole. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009 Oct;15 Suppl 5:77-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02985.x. PMID: 19754763.
14. Salas V, Pastor FJ, Calvo E, Alvarez E, Sutton DA, Mayayo E, Fothergill AW, Rinaldi MG, Guarro J. In vitro and in vivo activities of posaconazole and amphotericin B in a murine invasive infection by Mucor circinelloides: poor efficacy of posaconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 May;56(5):2246-50. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05956-11. Epub 2012 Jan 30. PMID: 22290952; PMCID: PMC3346623.

Most read articles by the same author(s)