HEMATOLOGICAL PARAMETERS AS PREDICTORS OF SEVERITY IN COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY

Main Article Content

Dr. Jignasa J. Mansuriya
Dr. Jaimin A. Mansuriya
Mr. Alok Pritam

Keywords

(Area Under the Curve, AUC). , Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) , Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), NNeutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) eutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR)

Abstract

Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) continues to represent a substantial public health burden in India, characterized by high rates of severity and associated mortality. Effective, rapid, and cost-efficient risk stratification tools are essential for timely intervention in resource-constrained tertiary care settings. While standard clinical scoring systems, such as the CURB-65, are widely used, their reliance on clinical judgment and potentially delayed laboratory results can hinder early triage. Hematological ratios, particularly the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and the Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), offer readily available markers reflecting the interplay between systemic inflammation and the host immune response.  


Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive utility of admission NLR and PLR in identifying Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia (SCAP), defined by the 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) criteria, among adult patients presenting to a North Indian tertiary care center.


Methods: A retrospective, single-center case-control study was conducted at the Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical & Health Sciences, Dehradun, India, utilizing medical records from 01 May 2023 to 30 October 2023. Sixty patients classified as SCAP (Cases: meeting ≥ 1 major or ≥ 3 minor IDSA/ATS criteria) were compared against 120 non-severe CAP patients (Controls). NLR and PLR were calculated from the first Complete Blood Count (CBC) obtained upon admission. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off values and discriminatory power (Area Under the Curve, AUC). Binary logistic regression was employed to calculate Adjusted Odds Ratios (AORs), controlling for established clinical risk factors, including age and CURB-65 score.


Results: SCAP patients exhibited significantly elevated mean NLR (14.5 ± 5.9) and PLR (288.7 ± 110.2) compared to controls (NLR: 5.8 ± 2.1; PLR: 175.3 ± 65.5; P<0.001 for both). ROC analysis identified an optimal NLR cut-off of 8.5 (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.79–0.91), demonstrating superior discriminatory ability compared to PLR (AUC 0.78). Multivariate analysis revealed that NLR >8.5 was an independent predictor of SCAP (AOR 4.95, 95% CI 2.15–11.40; P<0.001), retaining statistical significance even after adjustment for the CURB-65 score.

Abstract 37 | Pdf Downloads 14

References

1. Coggins W, Smith T. Prognostic value of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in predicting mortality in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia. J Infect Dis India. 2015;21(3):145–152.
2. Balk RA, Hata JS. Severe community-acquired pneumonia: IDSA/ATS guidelines and critical care management. Crit Care Clin. 2014;30(4):677–701.
3. Karaman K, Aydin O. Usefulness of the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio as predictors of severity in pulmonary diseases. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2016;58(2):88–95.
4. Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(4):243–250.
5. Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, Boersma WG, Karaman K, et al. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax. 2003;58(5):377–382.
6. Zhan Y, Zhang F, Li C. Association between platelet count abnormalities and mortality in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Chest. 2013;144(5):1560–1568.
7. Urbano J, Alcala H. The role of inflammatory markers derived from complete blood count in predicting outcomes in infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(1):120–135.
8. Menéndez R, Torres A. Severity criteria in community-acquired pneumonia. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;30(2):205–213.
9. Kartal O, Kartal J. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: a prognostic marker in community acquired pneumonia. J Clin Lab Anal. 2016;30(3):288–293.
10. Sriram K, Prakash N, Sethi R. Epidemiology and outcome of severe community acquired pneumonia in a tertiary care hospital in North India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2013;61(11):780–784.
11. Pifarré P, Culebras E, Montull S, Requejo M, et al. Prognostic utility of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in patients with pneumonia and sepsis. Int J Clin Pract. 2016;70(8):666–672.
12. Shah B, Parikh C. High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with adverse clinical outcome in critically ill patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(11):1858–1860.
13. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44 Suppl 2:S27–S72.
14. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818–829.