TRENDS AND PREDICTORS OF EMERGENCY BLADDER INJURY IN FEMALE PELVIC SURGERY: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY SECONDARY ANALYSIS USING PUBLIC AND SIMULATED CLINICAL DATA

Main Article Content

Dr. Samia Butt
Dr. Sidra Farooq
Dr. Amber Shams
Dr. Pavan Kumar
Dr. Abdul Ghaffar Arain
Dr. Misbah Aziz

Keywords

bladder injury, pelvic surgery, synthetic data, MIMIC-IV, HCUPnet, SEER, retrospective cohort, ROC curve

Abstract

Background: Iatrogenic bladder injury in pelvic surgery is a rare but serious problem. Strong evidence from clinical trials and large cohorts is still in short supply today. Methods: Investigation through HCUPnet summary data suggested national incidences of bladder injury following surgery were 0. 3% in cesarean section and 0. 4-1. 0% for hysterectomy. These incidences as well with bad consequences have never been recorded for certain general public hospital admissions in America Nowadays, we even find them inevitably occurring by doctors everywhere in America. Secondly, MIMICIV public dataset (PhysioNet) raw records of female ICU admissions for pelvic surgical complications in the urinary system, screen three years (2010-2012) were obtained. Only those patients meeting both criteria-- hospitalized and having diagnostic ICD equivalents for injury-- were included. Thus, we set 5,000 artificial cases to reflect the situations considered: cases index of 1,000 with which to model predictors. Results: In our HCUP net data, detrended-shifted bladder injury incidence rate estimated for C-sections was 0.3% . For hysterectomies, it was 0. 4%-1%. We found 120 ICU admissions following pelvic surgery for urinary injury. Multivariable logistic regression analysis suggested earlier abdominal surgery, older age and emergency cases as significant risk factors (p0.78). Conclusion: Public datasets show that bladder injury rates are small, but clinically significant. From its MIMICIV public data and synthetic cohort modeling, we were able to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting predictive research in full compliance with legal and ethical strictures.Citations support our methodology and external benchmarks.

Abstract 63 | Pdf Downloads 22

References

1. Vaidya B, Chaudhari M, Parmar D, et al. Bladder injuries during obstetrical and gynecological surgeries. Int Surg J. 2017;4(7):2177–2180.
2. Arcieri M, Cuman M, Restaino S, et al. Exploring urinary tract injuries in gynecological surgery. Healthcare (Basel). 2025;13(15):1780.
3. Jensen AS, Rudnicki M, Heinemeier IIK, et al. Iatrogenic bladder injury following gynecologic and obstetric surgery: A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023;102:1608–1617.
4. Rahman MS, Gasem T, Al Suleiman SA, et al. Bladder injuries during cesarean section in a university hospital: A 25-year review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;279(3):349–352.
5. Jaffer A, Mehta P, Shah D, Patel M. Incidence and risk factors of bladder injury during cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024;50(2):112–121.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39567413/
6. Amini L, Catov JM, Dehlendorf C. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery: A population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(3):383.e1–383.e9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.022
7. Malviya A, Tiwari S, Singh R. Bladder injury in emergency cesarean sections: A retrospective analysis. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2023;10(1):32–36.
https://www.ijogr.org/html-article/22537
8. Wei S, Qi J, Li F, Liu C. Urological injuries during cesarean section and hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;34(2):371–389.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05248-2
9. Härkki PS, Kurki T, Ylikorkala O. Urinary tract injuries after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(6):999–1002.
10. Vasavada SP, Rackley RR. Urologic complications of gynecologic surgery. Sci World J. 2012;2012:949164.
https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/949164
11. Li J, Ji Z, Chen W. Vesicouterine fistula: Diagnosis, management, and outcomes. Urology. 2019;126:10–15.
12. Gilmour D, Flowerdew G, Bouchard C. Bladder injury during gynecologic surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28(10):940–946.
13. Swanson AA, Hudson CO. Surgical complications of pelvic organ prolapse repair: Incidence and prevention. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2019;46(1):131–144.
14. Johnson AEW, Pollard TJ, Shen L, et al. MIMIC-IV (version 2.2). PhysioNet. 2022.
https://doi.org/10.13026/2mmh-m054
15. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). HCUPnet: A tool for identifying, tracking, and analyzing national hospital statistics. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
https://hcupnet.ahrq.gov
16. SEER Explorer. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. National Cancer Institute.
https://seer.cancer.gov/explorer/
17. Zenodo – Synthetic Clinical Datasets Repository. Example Dataset:
https://zenodo.org/record/3825853
18. GitHub – Synthetic Health Data. Example Repository:
https://github.com/synthetichealth/synthea

Most read articles by the same author(s)