EFFECT OF VIRTUAL REALITY (VR) GLAASSE ON GAG REFLEX DURING TAKING MAXILLARY IMPRESSION

Main Article Content

Syed Sadam Hussain
Muhammad Saqib
Shahab Uddin
Ali Hamad
Sajid Hussain
Usama Aurangzeb

Keywords

Maxillary Impression, Visual Analog Scale, Gag Reflex, Virtual Reality Glasses.

Abstract

The aim of our study is to assess the effectiveness of Virtual Reality (VR) glasses in reducing the gag reflex during maxillary impressions and to evaluate baseline gag reflex levels in patients without VR glasses. Additionally, we measure patient comfort using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with and without VR glasses during the procedure. This comparative experimental study was conducted from March to June 2024 at Iqra Dental Clinic, Iqra National University, Peshawar, involving 40 patients aged 18-65 years.


Dental impressions are essential for replicating oral tissues accurately; however, the gag reflex, a natural defense mechanism, often complicates the procedure. Our study explores the potential of VR glasses as a distraction tool to alleviate this reflex, improving patient comfort and reducing clinical stress.


Results show a significant decrease in the gag reflex when using VR glasses, with mean scores dropping from 5.2 without VR glasses to 0.85 with them (p-value 0.001). The VAS scores indicate that patients were more comfortable during the procedure with VR glasses. This suggests that VR glasses effectively reduce the gag reflex and enhance the patient experience during maxillary impressions.

Abstract 187 | PDF Downloads 76

References

1. Dental Impression Materials - Rachel Perry, 2013 [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jul 6]. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089875641303000213
2. JCDR - Accuracy, Optical impression, Operator preference, Patient preference [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jul 6]. Available from: https://www.jcdr.net/article_fulltext.asp?issn=0973-709x& year=2019&month=April&volume=13&issue=4&page=ZE01&id=12756
3. Rubel BS. Impression Materials: A Comparative Review of Impression Materials Most Commonly Used in Restorative Dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2007 Jul 1;51(3):629–42.
4. Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Herford AS, Laino L, Troiano G, Amoroso G, et al. Alginate Materials and Dental Impression Technique: A Current State of the Art and Application to Dental Practice. Mar Drugs. 2019 Jan;17(1):18.
5. Bedia S, Ghadage M, Joshi M. Gag reflex: An overview. NeuroQuantology. 2022 Jul 30;20:793–804.
6. Rosted P, Bundgaard M, Fiske J, Pedersen AML. The use of acupuncture in controlling the gag reflex in patients requiring an upper alginate impression: an audit. Br Dent J. 2006 Dec;201(11):721–5.
7. Bindhoo YA, Thirumurthy VR, Kurien A. Complete mucostatic impression: a new attempt. J Prosthodont Off J Am Coll Prosthodont. 2012 Apr;21(3):209–14.
8. A Novel Design of a Pick-up–Type Impression Coping [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jul 7]. Available from: https://www.aegisdentalnetwork.com/cced/2020/06/a-novel-design-of-a-pick-up-type-impression-coping
9. Quantifying Flabby Ridge Tissue Displacement During Impression-Making for Patients With Combination Syndrome [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jul 6]. Available from: https://www.aegisdentalnetwork.com/cced/2019/09/quantifying-flabby-ridge-tissue-displacement-during-impression-making-for-patients-with-combination-syndrome
10. Alqattan W, Alalawi H, Khan Z. Impression Techniques and Materials for Complete Denture Construction. Dent Health Curr Res. 2016 Jan 1;2.
11. Kršek H, Dulčić N. Functional Impressions in Complete Denture and Overdenture Treatment. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015 Mar;49(1):45–53.
12. Dj C, La T. The gagging problem in prosthodontic treatment. Part I: description and causes. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 1983 May [cited 2024 Jul 6];49(5). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6343586/
13. Jamshidy L, Mozaffari HR, Faraji P, Sharifi R. Accuracy of the One-Stage and Two-Stage Impression Techniques: A Comparative Analysis. Int J Dent. 2016;2016(1):7256496.

Most read articles by the same author(s)