COLLOIDS VERSUS CRYSTALLOIDS GUIDED BY INFERIOR VENA CAVA COLLAPSIBILITY INDEX IN BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION PROSTATE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY.
Main Article Content
Keywords
Transurethral resection prostate, volume overload, colloids, crystalloids, inferior vena cava diameter, fluid challenge
Abstract
BACKGROUNDː Intravenous (IV) fluid replacement during transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare colloids versus crystalloids using inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) to show their impact on the total amount of IV infused fluids.
Methods: This study included 34 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I and II patients who underwent bipolar TURP. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to two equal groups, crystalloid and colloid (n=17 in each group). The study subjects and the investigators assessing the outcome were blinded to the study group. The primary outcome was the total IV administered fluids volume. Secondary outcomes were the postoperative serum sodium and potassium, maximum and minimum IVC diameters, IVC-CI, incidence of bradycardia and hypotension, and total IV furosemide dose
RESULTSːI The mean ± SD of the total intravenous infused fluids in colloid group was 355.6 + 151 ml and in the crystalloid group was 602.5 + 200 ml (p = 0.0003). There were no statistical difference between the 2 groups in the serum sodium and potassium at the end of surgery, maximum and minimum IVC diameters, IVC-CI, incidence of bradycardia, incidence of hypotension, total intraoperative ephedrine dose, incidence of intraoperative nausea and/or vomiting, and total IV furosemide dose.
CONCLUSIONSː Colloid volume optimization using US-guided IVC-CI had reduced the total IV fluid volume and achieved volume optimization during TURP surgery with hemodynamic stability preventing fluid overload.
References
2. Aidan M, Irwin T.H. Anaesthesia for transurethral resection of the prostate Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain. 2009; 9(3): 92–96.
3. Blanshard H and Bennett D. TURP syndrome in: Allman KG McIndoe AK Wilson IH Emergencies in Anaesthesia. Oxford University Press. 2006;270-271.
4. Vinay Kumar, Kumar Vineet, and Adiveeth Deb TUR syndrome - A report. Urol Case Rep. 2019; 26: 100982.
5. Slots C, Uvin P, Van Damme E. Irrigation fluid absorption syndrome during HoLEP: A case study. Urol Case Rep. 2022 Oct 3; 45:102248.
6. Okuma N, Hino H, Kuroki M, Matsuura T, Mori T. Symptomatic absorption of normal saline during transurethral resection of the prostate: a case report. JA Clin Rep. 2022 Jun 21;8(1):43.
7. Ortner G, Nagele U, Herrmann TRW, Tokas T. Irrigation fluid absorption during transurethral bipolar and laser prostate surgery: a systematic review. World J Urol. 2022 Mar;40(3):697-708.
8. Base EM, Standl T, Lassnigg A, Skhirtladze K, Jungheinrich C, Gayko D et al. Efficacy and safety of hydroxyethyl starch 6% 130/0.4 in a balanced electrolyte solution (Volulyte) during cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Jun;25(3):407-14.
9. Xu L, Dai S, Shen J, Lv C, Tang Y, Chen X. The predictive ability of carotid artery corrected flow time and respirophasic variation in blood flow peak velocity measured by ultrasonography for fluid responsiveness in parturients for cesarean delivery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020;86(10):1039–1046.
10. Chawang HJ, Kaeley N, Bhardwaj BB, Chauhan U, Baid H, Asokan R et al. Ultrasound-guided estimation of internal jugular vein collapsibility index in patients with shock in emergency department. Turk J Emerg Med. 2022;22(4):206-212.
11. Feldheiser A, Pavlova V, Bonomo T, Jones A, Fotopoulou C, Sehouli J. Balanced crystalloid compared with balanced colloid solution using goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 110: 231–240.
12. Lindroos AC, Niiya T, Randell T, Niemi TT. Stroke volume-directed administration of hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4) and Ringer’s acetate in prone position during neurosurgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Anesth. 2014; 28:189–97.
13. Joosten A, Delaporte A, Ickx B, Touihri K, Stany I, Barvais L et al. Crystalloid versus Colloid for Intraoperative Goal-directed Fluid Therapy Using a Closed-loop System: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Controlled Trial in Major Abdominal Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2018 Jan;128(1):55-66.
14. Park SK, Park DN, Kim YW, Yoo S, Kim WH, Lim YJ et al. Colloid coload versus crystalloid coload to prevent maternal hypotension in women receiving prophylactic phenylephrine infusion during caesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2022 Feb; 49:103246.
15. Ciozda W, Kedan I, Kehl DW, Zimmer R, Khandwalla R, Kimchi A. The efficacy of sonographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter as an estimate of central venous pressure. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2016; 14:33–40.
16. Zhang Z, Xu X, Ye S, Xu L. Ultrasonographic measurement of the respiratory variation in the inferior vena cava diameter is predictive of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014; 40:845–853.
17. Zhang J, Critchley LA. Inferior vena cava ultrasonography before general anesthesia can predict hypotension after induction. Anesthesiology. 2016; 124:580–589.
18. Saranteas T, Manikis D, Papadimos T, Mavrogenis AF, Kostopanagiotou G, Panou F. Intraoperative TTE inferior vena cava monitoring in elderly orthopaedic patients with cardiac disease and spinal-induced hypotension. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016; 31:919–926.
19. Airapetian N, Maizel J, Alyamani O, Mahjoub Y, Lorne E, Levrard M, et al Does inferior vena cava respiratory variability predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients? Crit Care. 2015; 19:400.
20. X. Si, D. Cao, H. Xu, X. Guan Meta-analysis of ventilated versus spontaneously breathing patients in predicting fluid responsiveness by inferior vena cava variation Int J Clin Med, 9 (2018), pp. 760-777
21. Preau S, Bortolotti P, Colling D, Dewavrin F, Colas V, Voisin B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the inferior vena cava collapsibility to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with Sepsis and acute Circulatory failure Crit Care Med, 45 (3) (2017), pp. e290-e297
22. Milford, E.M., Reade, M.C. Resuscitation Fluid Choices to Preserve the Endothelial Glycocalyx. Crit Care 23, 77 (2019).
23. Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Billot L, Cass A, Gattas D, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367:1901–11.
24. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, French J, Myburgh J, Norton R. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350:2247–56.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Mohamed Ahmed Tolba
Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohamed Abdellatif Ghanem
Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohammed Abaalkhayl
Department of ER, Intensive Care and Anesthesia, Buraidah College of Medicine, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Sameh Mohamed El-Sherbiny
Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Amany Hazem EL-Deeb
Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.