INFECTION CONTROL PRACTICES OF DENTAL ASSISTANTS IN STANDARD DENTAL CARE MODELS

Main Article Content

Salha Saud Albishe
Samiah Jeres Alotaibi
Souad Nasser Alanaze
Maryam Motared Alanazi
Sara Ali Mohammad Bidhy
Wafaa Muteb Hamed Alshammari
Amani Mohammed Fallatah
Ahlam Saer Alotaibi

Keywords

Infection Control, Dental Assistants, Dental Care, Hand Hygiene, Sterilization Technologies, Patient Safety

Abstract

Introduction: Infection control within dental settings is paramount for patient safety and the prevention of diseasetransmission. Dental assistants play a crucial role in maintaining these standards through various practices and protocols. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of infection control interventions among dental assistants in standard dental care models, focusing on the impact of educational, technological, and procedural interventions on infection control adherence .


 


Methods: The review included interventional studies and clinical trials published from 2007 to 2022. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL using terms related to infection control, dental assistants, and dental care models. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria, focusing on those that assessed the outcomes of infection control practices. Risk ratios, percentages, and confidence intervals were extracted to evaluate the effectiveness of intervention.


 


Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a range of interventions from educational programs to the introduction of new sterilization technologies and enhanced hygiene protocols. Key findings include a significant improvement in hand hygiene compliance, increasing from 50% to 75% post-intervention; an 80% reduction in microbial contamination following the adoption of UV sterilization technologies; and a 25% increase in overall infection control adherence after multifaceted interventions. These results demonstrate the potential of targeted interventions to significantly improve infection control practices among dental assistants.


 


Conclusions: This review highlights the effectiveness of various interventions in improving infection control practices among dental assistants in dental care settings. Educational, technological, and procedural interventions were found to be beneficial, with significant improvements in compliance and reduction in contamination rates. Despite limitations related to study heterogeneity and scope, the findings provide valuable insights for enhancing patient safety and infection control in dental care.

Abstract 105 | PDF Downloads 5

References

1. De Paola LG. Infectious diseases in the oral healthcare environment. Inside Dental Assisting [serial on the Internet]. 2012; November/December: Available from: world.com/ courses/4636.
2. Kaste LM, Bednarsh H. The third decade of HIV/AIDS: a brief epidemiologic update for dentistry. J Can Dent Assoc 2007/2008 73: 941–944.
3. Molinari JA, Harte JA. Cottone’s Practical Infection Control in Dentistry, 3rd ed. Baltimore, Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkens, a Wolters Kluwer business; 2010.
4. Kuhar DT, Henderson DK, Struble KA et al., US Public Health Service Working Group. Updated US public health serviceguidelines for the management of occupational exposures to human immunodeficiency virus and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol [serial on the Internet] 2013 34: 875–892.
5. Oosthuysen J, Potgieter E, Blignaut E. Compliance with infection control recommendations in South African dental practices: a review of studies published between 1990 and 2007. Int Dent J 2010 60:181–189.
6. Centers for Disease Control. Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008. 2008.
7. Australian Dental Association. Australian Dental Association Guidelines for Infection Control, Second ed, Vol. II (Fryer FS, editor). St Leonards, Australia: Australian Dental Association Inc; 2012. p. 1–50. Available from: http://www.ada.org.au/app_cmslib/media/ lib/1203/m356702_v1_infection% 20control %20guidelines%202012.pdf.
8. British Dental Association. Advice Sheet A12 Infection Control in Dentistry (England). London: British Dental Association; 2011.
9. Guide to Infection Prevention for Outpatient Settings: Minimum Expectations for Safe Care [database on the Internet]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011 [cited 2013-04-03]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/pdfs/ guidelines/standatds-of-ambulatory-care-7-2011.pdf.
10. Infection Prevention Checklist for Outpatient Settings: Minimum Expectations for Safe Care [database on the Internet]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011 [cited 2013-04-03]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/pdfs/guidelines/ambulatory-care-checklist-07-2011.pdf.
11. Federation Dentaire Internationale. FDI Policy Statement on Infection Control in Dental Practice: Merging of ‘Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Other Blood Borne Infections (2000)’, ‘Infection Control in Dentistry’ (2007), and ‘Sterilizationand Cross Infection Control in the Dental Practice’ (2005).
12. Amritraj A, Rajan PS, Shenoy N et al. Awareness among young dentists about transmission of HIV and preventive measures. Int J Bioassays [serial on the Internet] 2013 [cited 2013 April] 2: 701– 704. Available from: http://ebioscholar.com/ojs/index. php/ijb/article/view/283.
13. Australian/New Zealand Standard. Office- based health care facilities – Reprocessing of reusable medical and surgical instruments and equipment, and maintenance of the associated environment. In: New Zealand, SAS, editor.: Jointly published by Standards Australia, GPO Box 476, Sydney, NSW 2001 and Standards New Zealand, Private Bag 2439, Wellington 6020; 2006.
14. British Dental Association. Infection Control in Dentistry. Advice Sheet A12 of the British Dental Association. London: British Dental Association; 2003.
15. Department of Health United Kingdom. Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices. Health Technical Memoranda Department of Health United Kingdom. Health Technical Memorandum 07-01: Safe management of healthcare waste. Health Technical Memoranda [serial on the Internet]. 2013
16. Department of Health United Kingdom. Health Technical Memorandum 01-05 Decontamination in primary care dental practices. Health Technical Memorandum 01-05. 2008 (Oct 2008):1-60.
17. Michmershuizen F. Dental associationsrespond to infection control breach in Oklahoma. Dental Tribune – The World’s Dental Newspaper. 2013 4 April.
18. Bradley K, Fox J, Wilson J et al. Investigation of HealthcareAssociated Hepatitis C Virus Transmission in a Dental Surgical Clinic Oklahoma, 2013. 2013 Annual CSTE Conference- Epi on the Edge; June 2013; Pasadena California. http://www.csteconference.org/2013.
19. Eaton K. Tulsa Oral Surgeon Accused in Health Scare Sued Oklahoma City (AP): Associated Press; 2013, [cited 2013 7 September]; Available from: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article /Tulsa-oral- surgeon-accused-in-health-scare-sued-4786971.php.
20. Cleveland J, Foster M, Barker L et al. Advancing infection control in dental care settings: factors associated with dentists’ implementation of guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. J Am Dent Assoc 2012 143: 1127–1138.
21. Smith A, Creanor S, Hurrell D et al. Management of infection control in dental practice. J Hosp Infect 2009 71: 353–358.
22. Yuzbasioglu E, Sarac € D, Canbaz SY et al. A survey of crossinfection control procedures: knowledge and attitudes of Turkish dentists. J Appl Oral Sci 2009 17: 565–569.
23. De Abreu MHNG, Lopes-Terre MC, Braz LF et al. Attitudes and behavior of dental students concerning infection control rules: a study with a 10- year interval. Braz Dent J 2009 20: 221–225.
24. Jain M, Sawla L, Mathur A et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards droplet and airborne isolation precautions amongs dental health care professionals in India. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010 15: e957–e961.
25. Singh BP, Khan SA, Agrawal N et al. Current biomedical waste management practices and cross- infection control procedures of dentists in India. Int Dent J 2012 62: 111–116.
26. Cheng HC, Su CY, Yen AM et al. Factors affecting occupational exposure to needlestick and sharps injuries among dentists in Taiwan: A nationwide survey. Public Library of Science 2012 7: e34911. Available from http://www.plosone. org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal. pone.0034911#pone-0034911-g001.
27. Kanjirath PP, Coplen AE, Chapman JC et al. Effectiveness of gloves and infection control in dentistry: student and provider perspectives. J Dent Educ 2009 73: 571–580.
28. World Health Organization. Guide to Implementation: AGuide to the Implementation of the WHO Multimodal Hand Hygiene Improvement Strategy. Save Lives Clean Your Hands. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2009.