A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL TO EVALUATE THE IMPACT OF ALPHA-BLOCKER DRUGS ON THE TIME PERIOD OF URINARY LEAKAGE AFTER A PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY

Main Article Content

Zulfiqar Ahmed
Safiullah Sohu
Faraz khalid
Rajab Ali
Ayaz Ahmad Khan
Muhammad Iqbal Nasim
Rashid Bin Hamid

Keywords

Alpha-blockers, Urinary leakage, nephrocutaneous fistula, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Abstract

Background: Post-removal urinary leakage subsequent to the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) procedure frequently presents as a notable complication. This can happen because of things like broken pieces of ureteral stones, edoema in the ureter, especially at the ureterovesical or ureteropelvic junction, blood clots, or even a ruptured calyx. This complication can significantly influence the patient's duration of hospitalization, leading to an extended stay, a postponed return to occupational activities, and consequent negative psychological repercussions.


The main goal of this study was to see if alpha-blockers, especially tamsulosin, could help shorten the time that urine leaks after PNL. This study sought to ascertain whether the utilization of alpha-blockers could serve as a practical intervention to alleviate the associated complications, thereby potentially reducing hospital stays and hastening the patient's recovery and reintegration into daily life. 


Study design: randomized clinical trial


Place and Duration: This study was conducted in Bilawal Medical College LUMHS Jamshoro from september 2022 to March 2023.


Methodology: In this study, we enrolled a total of 110 individuals undergoing PNL. Physical exams, lab tests, and full radiological evaluations, such as kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) imaging and plain computed tomography (CT), were all part of thorough assessments. The participants were randomly allocated into two evenly matched groups: Group A, consisting of 55 cases, received perioperative tamsulosin, whereas Group B, also comprising 55 cases, did not get tamsulosin treatment. Subsequent to the PNL procedure, a meticulous postoperative follow-up was conducted for both groups. The parameters under scrutiny included the DUL, instances of urinary catheterization, and the duration of the hospital stay.


Results: The DUL exhibited a statistically significant reduction in Group A (10.72±6.77 hours) in comparison to Group B (21.59±12.52 hours) (p-value < 0.001). Correspondingly, the length of hospitalization was markedly shorter in Group A (2.63±0.83 days) in contrast to Group B (3.21±1.12 days) (p-value 0.020). These findings underscore the impactful role of tamsulosin administration in Group A, which resulted in a marked decrease in the DUL post-PNL compared to the control Group B.


Conclusion: Among patients undergoing PNL for the management of renal stones, those who received tamsulosin experienced a notably reduced DUL, consequently leading to a shorter hospital stay in comparison to individuals who did not receive tamsulosin treatment. This observation points to a possible clinical benefit of giving tamsulosin to PNL patients with kidney stones: faster recovery after surgery and less time in the hospital. 

Abstract 204 | pdf Downloads 91

References

1. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. European urology. 2007 Apr 1;51(4):899-906.
2. Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, De La Rosette JJ. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its legacy. European urology. 2005 Jan 1;47(1):22-8.
3. Kim SC, Kuo RL, Lingeman JE. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update. Current opinion in urology. 2003 May 1;13(3):235-41.
4. Ghani KR, Andonian S, Bultitude M, Desai M, Giusti G, Okhunov Z, Preminger GM, de la Rosette J. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: update, trends, and future directions. European urology. 2016 Aug 1;70(2):382-96.
5. de La Rosette JJ, Laguna MP, Rassweiler JJ, Conort P. Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy—a critical review. European urology. 2008 Nov 1;54(5):994-1003.
6. Knoll T, Daels F, Desai J, Hoznek A, Knudsen B, Montanari E, Scoffone C, Skolarikos A, Tozawa K. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: technique. World journal of urology. 2017 Sep;35:1361-8.
7. Ganpule AP, Vijayakumar M, Malpani A, Desai MR. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review. International Journal of Surgery. 2016 Dec 1;36:660-4.
8. Kyriazis I, Panagopoulos V, Kallidonis P, Özsoy M, Vasilas M, Liatsikos E. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World journal of urology. 2015 Aug;33:1069-77.
9. Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A, Cormio L, Zhang X, Louie M, Grabe M, de la Rosette, on behalf of the CROES PCNL Study Group J. The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. Journal of endourology. 2011 Aug 1;25(8):1275-80.
10. Yu J, Park HK, Kwon HJ, Lee J, Hwang JH, Kim HY, Kim YK. Risk factors for acute kidney injury after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Implications of intraoperative hypotension. Medicine. 2018 Jul;97(30).
11. Matlaga BR, Hodges SJ, Shah OD, Passmore L, Hart LJ, Assimos DG. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: predictors of length of stay. The Journal of urology. 2004 Oct;172(4 Part 1):1351-4.
12. Kassem A, Hamdy A, Mosharafa A, Abdelrazzak OM. Effect of alpha blockers on duration of urinary leakage post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL): a prospective randomized study. African Journal of Urology. 2023 Dec;29(1):1-6.
13. Salih EM, Koritenah AK, Yehya M, Mourad MM. The efficacy of alpha-1A blocker (tamsulosin), antimuscarinic (solifenacin) and their combination in the management of double-J stent-related lower urinary tract symptoms: a randomized controlled study. African Journal of Urology. 2021 Dec;27:1-6.

Most read articles by the same author(s)