Main Article Content

Shuang Xu
Mitchell Levine


Primary care education, postgraduate/intern training, herbal medicines



There  is a  growing  public  interest  in  complementary  and  alternative  treatments.  The  attitudes  and perceptions regarding herbal therapies have not been evaluated amongst physicians-in-training.


This pilot study aimed to assess the self-perceived competence and attitudes of physicians-in-training in dealing with herbal medicines in clinical practice.


A survey was distributed amongst 26 medical residents and clinical clerks proceeding a lunch hour teaching session about the risks and benefits of herbal medicines. Respondents were asked to rate their competence, the adequacy of formal training, to indicate their belief in usefulness, and the sources used when dealing with herbal medicines. Estimates of patient use and personal use were also identified.


Respondents  indicated  low  confidence  in  their  competency  when  dealing  with  herbal  medicines  in practice; they lacked formal training on the subject, and were not knowledgeable about sources to refer patients to regarding herbal medicines. Half the respondents estimated that between 11-30% of their patients use herbal medicines, but 80% felt that less than 1 in 10 patients was sufficiently competent in the safe use of herbal medicines. The median response regarding the belief in the usefulness of herbal medicine was ‘less favourable than neutral’ but their interest in further information was ‘more favourable than neutral’. Although the literature was the most common source consulted, often no source was used.


Although residents and medical student clinical clerks encounter many patients who use herbal medicines, their own lack of knowledge and personal experience limit their ability to assist these patients in this area. Increased training on the benefits and risks of herbal medicines may help physicians-in-training care for patients using herbal medicines.

Abstract 301 | PDF Downloads 205


1. Singh SR, Levine MAH. NHP Use in Canada: Analysis of the National Population Health Survey. Can J Clin Pharm 2006;13(2):e240- e250.
2. Suter E, Vergoef M, O’Beirne M. Assessment of the information needs and use of information resources on complementary and alternative medicine by Alberta family physicians. Clin Invest Med 2004;27(6):312- 315.
3. Busse JW, Heaton G, Wu P, Wilson KR, Mills EJ. Disclosure of Natural Product Use to Primary Care Physicians: A Cross -sectional Survey of Naturopathic Clinic Attendees. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2005;80(5):616-623.
4. Brazier N, Levine M. Understanding Drug-Herb Interactions. Pharmacoepidemiology and Dr ug Safety 2003;12:427-430.
5. Lump JJ, Yarbrough L, Kilpatrick S, Cable T. Physicians’ Attitudes Toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Int Med 1998;1;149-153.
6. Einarson A, Lawrimore T, Brand P, Gallo M, Rotatone C, Koren G. Attitudes and Practices of Physicians and Naturopaths Toward Herbal Products, Including Use During Pregnancy and Lactation. Can J Clin Pharm 2000;7(1):45-49.

Most read articles by the same author(s)