MUTUAL RELATIONAL ORIENTATIONS: INTER-RELIGIOUS AND INTER-GENERATIONAL DIFFERENCES

Main Article Content

Ankita Singh
Rajesh Kumar Mourya

Keywords

Inter-group relations, Hindu, Muslim, inter-religious, inter-generational and mutual relational orientations

Abstract

Inter-group behavior represents an important topic of discussion and research in the field of social psychology. The term intergroup relations refer to relations between two or more groups and their respective members. It occurs when an individual behaves toward another group in terms of his/her reference group ties. The present study was conducted on 300 participants belonging to Hindu and Muslim groups to explore the inter-religious and inter-generational differences of mutual relational orientations. They were examined by using mutual relational orientation scale developed by (Berry, 2005) and adapted by (Mishra & Tripathi, 2006) in the Indian cultural. Result reported that younger generations have shown more co-existence, assimilation and marginalization rather than old aged. Result further revealed that Hindus preferred separation relational orientation and Muslims preferred integration, assimilation and co-existence relational orientations.


 

Abstract 0 | pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Berry, J. W. (2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 697-712.
2. Mishra, R. C., Sinha, D., & Berry, J. W. (1996). Ecology, acculturation and psychological adaptation: A study of adivasis in Bihar. Sage Publications, Inc.
3. Sinha, D. (1988). Basic Indian values and behavior dispositions in the context of national development: An appraisal. In D. Sinha & H. S. R. Kao (Eds.), Social Values and Development: Asian Perspective (pp. 31-55). New Delhi: Sage.
4. Sinha, D., & Tripathi, R.C. (1994). Individualism in a collectivist culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. In U. Kim, H.C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications (pp. 123-136). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
5. Tripathi, R. C., & Mishra, R. C. (2016). Acculturation in South Asia. In D. Sam & J.W. Berry (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 337–354). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bano, S., & Mishra, R. C. (2006). The effect of schooling on the development of social identity and prejudice in Hindu and Muslim children. Indian Journal of Community Psychology, 2(1), 168-182.
7. Bano, S., & Mishra, R. C. (2009). Social identity and inter-group perception of Hindu and Muslim adolescents. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 4(2), 417–425.
8. Bano, S., & Mishra, R. C. (2011). Relational orientations of Hindu and Muslim adolescents in traditional and modern schools. In P. Singh, P. Bain, L. Chan- Hoong, G. Misra & Y. Ohtsubo (Eds.), Identity, Multiculturalism and Changing Societies: Psychological, Group and Cultural Processes (pp. 219- 230). New Delhi: MacMillan Publishers.
9. Bano, S., & Mishra, R. C. (2014). Development of social identity and prejudice in Hindu and Muslim children. Social Science International. 30(1), 127–142.
10. Bano, S., Mishra, R. C., & Tripathi, R. C. (2018). Mutual perception and relational strategies of Hindus and Muslims in India. In M. Karasawa, M. Yuki, K. Ishii, Y. Uchida, K. Sato, & W. Friedlmeier (Eds.), Venture into cross-cultural psychology: Proceedings from the 23rd Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/iaccp_papers/155/
11. Siddiki, R.N. (2011). Appraisal of out-group in the context of intergroup relations: Role of personal and collective identity. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 26, 167-182.
12. Mishra, R. C., Bano, S., & Tripathi, R. C. (2017). Hindu-Muslim relations in India. In J. W. Berry (Eds.), Mutual intercultural relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Most read articles by the same author(s)