DEVELOPING A RAPID ASSESSMENT AND INTERVENTION PROTOCOL FOR PEDIATRIC SEPSIS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: INTEGRATION OF CHEMICAL PATHOLOGY BIOMARKERS AND POINT-OF-CARE TESTING
Main Article Content
Keywords
Pediatric Sepsis, Chemical Pathology Biomarkers, morbidity and mortality
Abstract
Background: Pediatric sepsis is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality across the globe, especially in resource-suboptimal emergency units where early identification is one of the factors that are associated with adverse outcomes. Biochemical markers can be used to identify a condition at an early stage and facilitate intervention.
Objective: To develop and evaluate a rapid assessment and intervention protocol integrating chemical pathology biomarkers and point-of-care testing (POCT) for pediatric sepsis in the emergency department.
Methods: This observational research was done in the Pediatric Emergency Department of Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, between January and June 2025. Sixty two of these children were 1 month to 12 years old. The rapid screening consisted of clinical evaluation, point-of-care lactate, and venous blood gas evaluation and laboratory C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). The compliance with sepsis bundle, time to intervention indicators and clinical outcomes were documented. Comparisons were made between shock vs non-shock patients and lactate <2 mmol/L vs ≥2 mmol/L groups.
Results: Shock was present in 31.9% of patients. Mean lactate levels were significantly higher in shock patients (4.8 ± 1.9 mmol/L) compared to non-shock patients (2.1 ± 0.9 mmol/L; p < 0.001). ICU admission was significantly more frequent among children with lactate ≥2 mmol/L (42.9% vs 10.0%; p = 0.003). Antibiotics were administered within 60 minutes in 80.6% of cases. Overall mortality was 8.3%, primarily among patients with persistent hyperlactatemia.
Conclusion: Integration of POCT lactate and inflammatory biomarkers into a rapid pediatric sepsis protocol improved early risk stratification and was strongly associated with clinical severity and outcomes. Biomarker-guided management may enhance emergency sepsis care in high-burden settings.
References
2. Rajsic, S., et al., Diagnostic modalities in critical care: point-of-care approach. 2021. 11(12): p. 2202.
3. Rosenqvist, M., Sepsis-an ED perspective. Sepsis Alert & Biomarkers. 2021.
4. Tsao, Y.-T., et al., Differential markers of bacterial and viral infections in children for point-of-care testing. 2020. 26(12): p. 1118-1132.
5. Gupta, E., et al., Fast track diagnostic tools for clinical management of sepsis: paradigm shift from conventional to advanced methods. 2023. 13(2): p. 277.
6. Wilson, S., M.K. Bohn, and K.J.E. Adeli, POCT: An inherently ideal tool in pediatric laboratory medicine. 2021. 32(2): p. 145.
7. Anthony, B.J.M.s.T., Dissertations, Graduate Research and M.P. Overview, Effect of Point of Care Testing On Emergency Department Throughput Time. 2023.
8. Tanak, A.S., et al., Multiplexed cytokine detection using electrochemical point-of-care sensing device towards rapid sepsis endotyping. 2021. 171: p. 112726.
9. Vaezipour, N., et al., Towards accurate point-of-care tests for tuberculosis in children. 2022. 11(3): p. 327.
10. Liu, G., et al., Point‐of‐care detection of cytokines in cytokine storm management and beyond: Significance and challenges. 2021. 2(4): p. 20210003.
11. Pittman, T.W., et al., Saliva-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic. 2023. 13(3): p. 1091.
12. Parihar, A., et al., Point-of-care biosensor-based diagnosis of COVID-19 holds promise to combat current and future pandemics. 2020. 3(11): p. 7326-7343.
13. Wang, K.K., et al., Blood-based traumatic brain injury biomarkers–Clinical utilities and regulatory pathways in the United States, Europe and Canada. 2021. 21(12): p. 1303-1321.
14. Chakrapani, A.T.J.N.D.M.M. and C.T. Approaches, in Emergency Medicine. 2021: p. 29.
15. Peck Palmer, O.M., et al., Recognition of the prehospital preanalytical phase: collaborative efforts between laboratory medicine and emergency medicine to ensure quality testing. 2020. 66(8): p. 998-1005.
16. Habli, Z., F. Kobeissy, and M.L.J.R.i.t.N. Khraiche, Advances in point-of-care platforms for traumatic brain injury: recent developments in diagnostics. 2022. 33(3): p. 327-345.
17. Kiss, H., et al., Exhaled biomarkers for point-of-care diagnosis: recent advances and new challenges in breathomics. 2023. 14(2): p. 391.
18. Tanak, A.S., et al., Simultaneous detection of sepsis host response biomarkers in whole blood using electrochemical biosensor. 2022. 7(3): p. e10310.
19. Bohn, M.K., et al., Cardiac biomarkers in pediatrics: an undervalued resource. 2021. 67(7): p. 947-958.
20. Rickard, J.J., et al., Rapid optofluidic detection of biomarkers for traumatic brain injury via surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. 2020. 4(6): p. 610-623.
21. Yang, S.-M., et al., Microfluidic point-of-care (POC) devices in early diagnosis: A review of opportunities and challenges. 2022. 22(4): p. 1620.

