“OUTCOMES OF DORSAL ONLAY URETHROPLASTY USING BUCCAL AND VAGINAL GRAFTS FOR FEMALE URETHRAL STRICURES AT A TERTIARY HOSPITAL”
Main Article Content
Keywords
Female urethral stricture, Dorsal onlay urethroplasty, Buccal mucosal graft, Vaginal wall graft, Urethral reconstruction, Functional outcomes, Complications, Patient satisfa
Abstract
Background: Urethral stricture is a clinical complication that is rather uncommon in females but may result in urinary retention, repeated infections, and poor quality of life. Graft-based dorsal onlay urethroplasty with buccal mucosal grafts (BMG) or vaginal wall grafts (VWG) is a successful reconstructive method that has limited information on Pakistani tertiary care centers.
Objective: To compare the functional and anatomical outcomes, complication rates, and patient satisfaction after dorsal onlay urethroplasty with buccal and vaginal grafts in women with Urethral strictures.
Methods: The study was a cross-sectional study conducted at Department of Urology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences Islamabad in the duration from January, 2025 to June, 2025. Forty adult females who had symptomatic urethral strictures were undergoing dorsal onlay urethroplasty using BMG (n=22) or VWG (n=18). The preoperative evaluation comprised uroflowmetry, post-void residual, urethroscopy, and imaging. Urinary flow, graft success, complications, and patient satisfaction were measured in postoperative follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months.
Results: Mean patient age was 42.5 ± 12.3 years. Uroflowmetry improved significantly, with a postoperative mean stricture length of 1.8 ± 0.6 cm. Qmax improved significantly preoperatively, 7.2±1.9 mL/s vs. postoperatively 19.6 ±3.2 mL/s (p < 0.001). BMG and VWG had an overall success rate of 90.9% and 88.9%, respectively. Fifteen percent of patients recorded minor complications, and no significant complications. The rate of high patient satisfaction was found in 87.5 percent of cases.
Conclusion: Buccal or vaginal graft dorsal onlay urethroplasty is a safe and efficient method of treating female urethral strictures, offering superior functional results, few complications, and high patient satisfaction. The choice of grafts can be customized by the availability of tissues and the preference of the patient, and the success of this working process requires attention to surgical methods.
References
2. Kore RN, Martins FE. Dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft and vaginal wall graft for female urethral stricture–Outcome of two-institution study. Indian Journal of Urology. 2022 Apr 1;38(2):140-5.
3. Bajoria S, Bhunia A, Sasmal S, Sharma PK, Maiti S, Gupta AK, Santra S, Mandal S. Dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft female urethroplasty: Our experience in a tertiary care center of Eastern India. International Journal of Reconstructive Urology. 2025 Jul 1;3(2):249-54.
4. Babelay G, Ahmad A, Ranjan N, Dheeraj K. Analysis of outcome of dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft and vaginal wall graft for female urethral stricture. Urology Annals. 2025 Jul 1;17(3):156-60.
5. Hassan RU, Siraj S, Khan A, Saleem A, Ahmad I, Naeem R. Dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft and vaginal wall graft for female urethral stricture; outcome of a Tertiary Care Hospital. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2022 Aug 11;16(05):1519-.
6. Bain M, Gomez Zapata DE, Ravichandran K, Fogaing C, Anand A, Talpallikar A, Bhadranawar S, Kulkarni S, Desai D, Joshi P. Female urethral stricture: A multi‐centre experience and lessons learnt. BJUI Compass. 2025 May;6(5):e70024.
7. Al-Misbah T, Chowdhury AM, Ahmed AB, Enayetullah I, Khan SA. Labial mucosal substitution urethroplasty for female urethral stricture: A sustainable technique. Bangladesh Journal of Urology. 2023 Jul 30;26(2):78-83.
8. Waterloos M, Verla W, Wirtz M, Waterschoot M, Claeys W, Francois P, Lumen N. Female urethroplasty: outcomes of different techniques in a single center. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021 Aug 31;10(17):3950.
9. Horiguchi A, Ojima K, Shinchi M, Hirano Y, Hamamoto K, Ito K, Asano T, Takahashi E, Kimura F, Azuma R. POS 001. Journal of Urology. 2021;206(Supplement 3):e381-2.
10. Wessells H, Morey A, Souter L, Rahimi L, Vanni A. Urethral stricture disease guideline amendment (2023). The Journal of Urology. 2023 Jul;210(1):64-71.
11. de Toledo IA, DeLong J. Female urethral reconstruction: urethral diverticulectomy, urethral strictures, vesicovaginal fistula. Urologic Clinics. 2022 Aug 1;49(3):393-402.
12. Nilsen OJ, Ekerhult T, Grabowska B, Sairanen J. PD22-05 TO TRANSECT OR NOT—A RANDOMIZED SCANDINAVIAN STUDY OF SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION AFTER URETHROPLASTY. Journal of Urology. 2021 Sep 1;206(Supplement 3):e381-2.
13. Purohit RS, Torres C, Blaivas JG. Female Urethral Reconstructive Surgery. In: Complications of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. 2025 Oct 20; pp. 231-247. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
14. de Rooij FP, Falcone M, Waterschoot M, Pizzuto G, Bouman MB, Gontero P, Lumen N, Pigot GL. Surgical outcomes after treatment of urethral complications following metoidioplasty in transgender men. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2022 Feb;19(2):377-84.
15. Alvarez de Toledo I. Female Urethral Reconstruction. In: Female Genitourinary and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction. 2023 Jul 22; pp. 1-12. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
16. Bandini M, Joshi P, Bafna S, Yepes C, Alrefaey A, Longoni M, Montorsi F, Kulkarni S. Establishing the role of single‐stage preputial spiral graft urethroplasty for panurethral stricture. BJU International. 2025 May 24.
17. Mtafu NH, Mtaturu GF, Muhsin A, Alexandre AM, Mhaya JK, Mwanga AH, Nyongole OV, Mkony CA. Factors Influencing the Treatment Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Urethroplasty for Urethral Stricture at Muhimbili National Hospital. International Journal of Urology and Renal Health. 2023;12(1):45-52.
18. Lumen N, Campos-Juanatey F, Dimitropoulos K, Greenwell T, Martins FE, Osman N, Riechardt S, Waterloos M. Urethral Strictures. In: EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2022; 2022.
=

