COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFICACY OF TECHNIQUES FOR ADMINISTERING ETOMIDATE IN PREVENTION OF ETOMIDATE INDUCED MYOCLONUS.
Main Article Content
Keywords
etomidate-induced myoclonus; priming dose; slow injection; fentanyl pretreatment; anesthetic induction.
Abstract
Background: Etomidate is a preferred induction agent in patients with limited cardiovascular reserve but is frequently associated with etomidate-induced myoclonus (EIM), which can be distressing and potentially hazardous in selected clinical scenarios. Various pharmacological and technique-based strategies have been proposed to attenuate EIM, but the optimal practical approach in routine practice remains unclear.
Methods: In this prospective, randomized, observational study, 60 ASA I–II patients aged 18–60 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were allocated into three groups (n=20 each): Control (normal saline pretreatment, etomidate 0.3 mg/kg rapid bolus), Priming + Slow Injection (priming dose etomidate 0.03 mg/kg followed 60 seconds later by 0.27 mg/kg over 30–60 seconds), and Fentanyl Pretreatment (fentanyl 2 μg/kg pretreatment, etomidate 0.3 mg/kg rapid bolus). Incidence and severity of myoclonus (4-point scale) were the primary outcomes; onset, duration of myoclonus, time to loss of consciousness, hemodynamics, pain on injection, and adverse effects were recorded as secondary outcomes.
Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable across groups. The incidence of EIM was significantly lower in the Priming + Slow Injection (30%) and Fentanyl Pretreatment (40%) groups compared with the Control group (85%, p<0.001). Severe (Grade 3) myoclonus occurred in 25% of control patients but was completely abolished in both intervention groups. Among patients who developed myoclonus, onset was significantly delayed and duration significantly shortened in the Priming + Slow Injection group (52.8±8.3 s and 8.2±2.5 s, respectively) compared with Fentanyl Pretreatment (38.5±6.7 s; 10.8±3.2 s) and Control (24.3±5.2 s; 18.5±4.8 s; p<0.001). Hemodynamic variables remained stable and comparable between groups, pain on injection was minimal, and adverse events were infrequent with no significant inter-group differences.
Conclusion: Both priming with slow injection of etomidate and fentanyl pretreatment effectively reduce the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus without compromising hemodynamic stability or increasing adverse effects. The priming with slow injection technique offers superior control of onset and duration of myoclonus and represents a simple, drug-sparing strategy suitable for routine clinical practice.
References
2. Mullick P, Talwar V, Aggarwal S, Prakash S, Pawar M. Comparison of priming versus slow injection for reducing etomidate-induced myoclonus: a randomized controlled study. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018;71(4):305-310. doi:10.4097/kja.d.18.27168
3. Aissaoui Y, Belyamani L, El Wali A, Idrissi Hajjouji SM, Atmani M, Drissi Kamili N. Prevention of myoclonus after etomidate using a priming dose. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2006;25(10):1041-5. doi:10.1016/j.annfar.2006.08.014
4. Un B, Ceyhan D, Yelken B. Prevention of etomidate-related myoclonus in anesthetic induction by magnesium. Anesth Pain Med. 2011;1(2):67-9. doi:10.5812/kowsar.22287523.2177
5. Isitemiz I, Uzman S, Toptaş M, Vahapoglu A, Gül YG, Yilmaz Inal F, et al. Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: Which is superior: Fentanyl, midazolam, or a combination? A retrospective comparative study. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:262-7. doi:10.12659/MSM.890037
6. Do SH, Han SH, Park SH, Kim JH, Hwang JY, Na HS, et al. The effect of injection rate on etomidate-induced myoclonus. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2008;55(3):305-7. doi:10.4097/kjae.2008.55.3.305
7. Zhou C, Zhu Y, Liu Z, Ruan L. Effect of pretreatment with midazolam on etomidate-induced myoclonus: A meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2017;45(2):399-406. doi:10.1177/0300060516682882
8. Luan HF, Zhao ZB, Feng JY, Cui JZ, Zhang XH, Zhang GB, et al. Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus during anesthetic induction by pretreatment with dexmedetomidine. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015;48(2):186-90. doi:10.1590/1414-431X20144100

