COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFICACY OF TECHNIQUES FOR ADMINISTERING ETOMIDATE IN PREVENTION OF ETOMIDATE INDUCED MYOCLONUS.

Main Article Content

Dr Mohan Babu Nema
Dr Deepali valecha
Dr. Mahesh Gupta
Dr. Preeti Gupta

Keywords

etomidate-induced myoclonus; priming dose; slow injection; fentanyl pretreatment; anesthetic induction.

Abstract

Background: Etomidate is a preferred induction agent in patients with limited cardiovascular reserve but is frequently associated with etomidate-induced myoclonus (EIM), which can be distressing and potentially hazardous in selected clinical scenarios. Various pharmacological and technique-based strategies have been proposed to attenuate EIM, but the optimal practical approach in routine practice remains unclear.


Methods: In this prospective, randomized, observational study, 60 ASA I–II patients aged 18–60 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were allocated into three groups (n=20 each): Control (normal saline pretreatment, etomidate 0.3 mg/kg rapid bolus), Priming + Slow Injection (priming dose etomidate 0.03 mg/kg followed 60 seconds later by 0.27 mg/kg over 30–60 seconds), and Fentanyl Pretreatment (fentanyl 2 μg/kg pretreatment, etomidate 0.3 mg/kg rapid bolus). Incidence and severity of myoclonus (4-point scale) were the primary outcomes; onset, duration of myoclonus, time to loss of consciousness, hemodynamics, pain on injection, and adverse effects were recorded as secondary outcomes.


Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable across groups. The incidence of EIM was significantly lower in the Priming + Slow Injection (30%) and Fentanyl Pretreatment (40%) groups compared with the Control group (85%, p<0.001). Severe (Grade 3) myoclonus occurred in 25% of control patients but was completely abolished in both intervention groups. Among patients who developed myoclonus, onset was significantly delayed and duration significantly shortened in the Priming + Slow Injection group (52.8±8.3 s and 8.2±2.5 s, respectively) compared with Fentanyl Pretreatment (38.5±6.7 s; 10.8±3.2 s) and Control (24.3±5.2 s; 18.5±4.8 s; p<0.001). Hemodynamic variables remained stable and comparable between groups, pain on injection was minimal, and adverse events were infrequent with no significant inter-group differences.


Conclusion: Both priming with slow injection of etomidate and fentanyl pretreatment effectively reduce the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus without compromising hemodynamic stability or increasing adverse effects. The priming with slow injection technique offers superior control of onset and duration of myoclonus and represents a simple, drug-sparing strategy suitable for routine clinical practice.


 

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Prakash S, Mullick P, Virmani P, Talwar V, Singh R. Effect of pre-treatment with a combination of fentanyl and midazolam for prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2019;49(1):11-17. doi:10.5152/TJAR.2019.90248
2. Mullick P, Talwar V, Aggarwal S, Prakash S, Pawar M. Comparison of priming versus slow injection for reducing etomidate-induced myoclonus: a randomized controlled study. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018;71(4):305-310. doi:10.4097/kja.d.18.27168
3. Aissaoui Y, Belyamani L, El Wali A, Idrissi Hajjouji SM, Atmani M, Drissi Kamili N. Prevention of myoclonus after etomidate using a priming dose. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2006;25(10):1041-5. doi:10.1016/j.annfar.2006.08.014
4. Un B, Ceyhan D, Yelken B. Prevention of etomidate-related myoclonus in anesthetic induction by magnesium. Anesth Pain Med. 2011;1(2):67-9. doi:10.5812/kowsar.22287523.2177
5. Isitemiz I, Uzman S, Toptaş M, Vahapoglu A, Gül YG, Yilmaz Inal F, et al. Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: Which is superior: Fentanyl, midazolam, or a combination? A retrospective comparative study. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:262-7. doi:10.12659/MSM.890037
6. Do SH, Han SH, Park SH, Kim JH, Hwang JY, Na HS, et al. The effect of injection rate on etomidate-induced myoclonus. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2008;55(3):305-7. doi:10.4097/kjae.2008.55.3.305
7. Zhou C, Zhu Y, Liu Z, Ruan L. Effect of pretreatment with midazolam on etomidate-induced myoclonus: A meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2017;45(2):399-406. doi:10.1177/0300060516682882
8. Luan HF, Zhao ZB, Feng JY, Cui JZ, Zhang XH, Zhang GB, et al. Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus during anesthetic induction by pretreatment with dexmedetomidine. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015;48(2):186-90. doi:10.1590/1414-431X20144100