TO EXAMINE THE IMPACT OF NEUROPLASTICITY BASED INTERVENTION ON MOTOR FUNCTION RECOVERY IN POST-STROKE PATIENTS

Main Article Content

Monika Shishodia
Dr. Mansi Srivastava
Dr. Monika Sharma

Keywords

Neuroplasticity, Stroke rehabilitation, Motor recovery,  Neuromodulation, Cortical reorganization, Brainplasticity, Stroke intervention, Task-specific training, Repetitive practice, Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), Functional electrical stimulation (FES).

Abstract

Stroke is considered as one of the leading causes of long-term disability and impairment globally, particularly affecting individual’s motor, cognitive and sensory functions as well.


This study assesses and explores the role of neuroplasticity in stroke rehabilitation, focusing on how physiotherapy can enhance neural reorganization for functional recovery.


A total of 50 patients (aged ≥ 50 years) participated in structured physiotherapy sessions focusing on post-stroke motor function recovery.


Results demonstrated significant improvements in motor function, supporting the effectiveness of targeted physiotherapy interventions.


This study highlights the need for interventions for stroke that not only assist but also, actively promote neurological recovery through targeted neuroplastic changes.


Neuroplasticity —brain’s exceptional capacity to adapt, reorganize & form new connections — lies at heart of recovery after stroke. When stroke occurs, it can disrupt the ability of a person to move, think, or sense the world around them, deeply affecting daily life. Rehabilitation becomes not just a medical necessity, but a pathway to regaining independence and confidence.


Through neuroplasticity, the brain can definitely find new ways to repair damaged areas, creating and strengthening alternative pathways. Modern rehabilitation therapies build on this amazing capacity, helping individuals relearn lost skills and rebuild their lives step by step.


This study explores how therapies that tap into the brain’s natural ability to adapt like: performance-specific training & neuro-modulation, can support recovery after a stroke. These approaches aim to encourage the brain to reorganize itself, helping restore function in areas that have been affected. By harnessing the power of neuroplasticity, the research looks at how stroke survivors can achieve better outcomes, particularly in rebuilding movement, language as well as cognitive abilities that are lost or get impaired once stroke occurs.

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Burke, S. N., & Barnes, C. A. (2006). Neural plasticity in the ageing brain
2. Krakauer, J. W. (2006). Motor learning: Its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation
3. Nudo, R. J. (2013). Recovery after brain injury
4. Krebs, H. I., et al. (2008). Rehabilitation robotics: performance-based progressive robot-assisted therapy
5. Gómez-Pinilla, F. (2008). Brain foods: The effects of nutrients on brain function.
6. Schaechter, J. D. (2004). Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke.
7. Winstein, C. J., et al. (2016). Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery.
8. French, B., et al. (2010). Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke.
9. Kwakkel, G., et al. (2015). Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke.
10. Lang, C. E., & Birkenmeier, R. L. (2013). Upper extremity task-specific training.
11. Taub, E., et al. (2006). Techniques for enhancing use of the affected limb: shaping and behavioral strategies.
12. Thieme, H., Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., et al. (2012). Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke.
13. Altschuler, E. L., et al. (1999). Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror.
14. Mehrholz, J., Thomas, S., Elsner, B. (2018). Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke.
15. Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B. J., Krebs, H. I. (2008). Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review.
16. Taub, E., Uswatte, G., & Elbert, T. (2006). Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new approach to improving functional recovery in stroke patients.
17. Deconinck, F. J. A., et al. (2015). Reflections on mirror therapy: A systematic review of the effect of mirror visual feedback on the brain.
18. Ward, N. S. (2017). Restoring brain function after stroke–bridging the gap between animals and humans. Nature Reviews Neurology, 13(4), 244–255.
19. Lu, B., Nagappan, G., Guan, X., Nathan, P. J., & Wren, P. (2013). BDNF-based synaptic repair as a disease-modifying strategy for neurodegenerative diseases. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(6), 401–416.
20. Gomez-Pinilla, F., & Hillman, C. (2013). The influence of exercise on cognitive abilities. Comprehensive Physiology, 3(1), 403–428.
21. Erickson, K. I., Voss, M. W., Prakash, R. S., et al. (2011). Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 3017–3022.
22. Gómez-Pinilla, F. (2008). Brain foods: The effects of nutrients on brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(7), 568–578.
23. Kanoski, S. E., & Davidson, T. L. (2011). Western diet consumption and cognitive impairment: Links to hippocampal dysfunction and obesity. Physiology & Behavior, 103(1), 59–68.
24. Lefaucheur, J. P., Aleman, A., Baeken, C., et al. (2020). Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clinical Neurophysiology, 131(2), 474–528.
25. Uhlhaas, P. J., & Singer, W. (2006). Neural synchrony in brain disorders: Relevance for cognitive dysfunctions and pathophysiology. Neuron, 52(1), 155–168.

Most read articles by the same author(s)