ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS OF SELECTIVE SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS IN GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY FROM A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN RURAL INDIA

Main Article Content

Dr. Shalini Shukla
Dr. Naveen Kumar
Dr. Nikhil Goel
Dr. Navin Budania
Dr. Siddharth Ahuja
Dr. Vinod Kumar Bhardwaj

Keywords

Generalized anxiety disorder; Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; Adverse drug reactions; Pharmacovigilance; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Rural India.

Abstract

Background: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) affects approximately 6% of the population globally, with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) representing first-line pharmacotherapy. However, adverse drug reaction (ADR) profiles in real-world settings, particularly in rural Indian populations with GAD, remain inadequately documented.


Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted over 12 months in the psychiatry outpatient department. Forty-five drug-naïve adult patients with newly diagnosed GAD (ICD-10 criteria) prescribed SSRI monotherapy were enrolled using systematic random sampling. ADRs were monitored using structured proformas and assessed using WHO-UMC causality scale, modified Hartwig and Siegel severity scale, and Schumock and Thornton preventability criteria. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.


Results: Among 45 GAD patients (mean age 36.0 ± 1.92 years; M:F = 0.95:1), 88 ADRs were reported. Escitalopram was most frequently implicated (53.3%), followed by paroxetine (28.9%). Central nervous system ADRs predominated (50%), with headache (11.4%), dizziness (10.2%), and drowsiness (9.1%) being most common. Gastrointestinal ADRs accounted for 33%. Most ADRs were mild (88.6%) and non-preventable (90.9%). All ADRs were classified as "possible" by


 


causality assessment. Tobacco use showed significant association with multiple ADR occurrence (p=0.035).


Conclusion: SSRIs demonstrate an acceptable safety profile in GAD management with predominantly mild, manageable ADRs. Enhanced pharmacovigilance, patient education regarding lifestyle modifications, and routine cognitive monitoring may optimize therapeutic outcomes in rural populations.

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. World Health Organization. Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders: Global Health Estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/depression-global-health-estimates
2. Nyberg J, Henriksson M, Wall A, Vestberg T, Westerlund M, Walser M, et al. Anxiety severity and cognitive function in primary care patients with anxiety disorder: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):617. doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03618-z PMID:34876077
3. Gandhi PA, Kishore J. Prevalence of depression and the associated factors among the software professionals in Delhi: A cross-sectional study. Indian J Public Health. 2020;64(4):413-416. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_255_20
4. Bruton LL, Hilal-Dandan R, Knollmann BC. Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 13th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Education; 2018.
5. Koirala B, Rauniar G, Shakya D. Adverse effects including sexual problems associated with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in a tertiary care center of Eastern Nepal. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2015;4(4):651-656. doi:10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20150366
6. World Health Organization. International Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to Drugs: Adverse Reaction Terminology. Geneva: WHO; 1992. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/61056
7. Hu XH, Bull SA, Hunkeler EM, Ming E, Lee JY, Fireman B, et al. Incidence and duration of side effects and those rated as bothersome with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment for depression: patient report versus physician estimate. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65(7):959-965. doi:10.4088/jcp. v65n0712 PMID:15291684
8. Madhan R, Lucca J, Gurumurthy P, Dushad R. A prospective observational study to evaluate safety reporting of antidepressants at a tertiary care hospital in India. Indian J Pharmacol. 2014;46(5):543-547. doi:10.4103/0253-7613.140591 PMID:25298585
9. Pharmacovigilance Programme of India. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. Available from: https://www.ipc.gov.in/PvPI/pv_home.html
10. Shukla S, Sharma P, Gupta P, Pandey S, Agrawal R, Rathour D, et al. Current scenario and future prospects of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) monitoring and reporting mechanisms in the rural areas of India. Curr Drug Saf. 2024;19(2):172-190. doi:10.2174/1574886318666230428144120 PMID:37132145
11. Sisay T, Wami R. Adverse drug reactions among major depressive disorders: patterns by age and gender. Heliyon. 2021;7(12): e08655. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2021.e08655 PMID:34926896
12. Sankhi S, Marasine NR, Sankhi S, Lamichhane R. Adverse drug reaction due to antidepressants among patients with depression in a private psychiatric hospital of Nepal. Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:6682928. doi:10.1155/2020/6682928 PMID:32596329
13. Kumar N, Kela AK. Ondansetron amelioration of scopolamine induced cognitive deficits in three-panel runway apparatus in rats. Indian J Exp Biol. 2004;42(9):919-21
14. Bacqué-Cazenave J, Bharatiya R, Barrière G, Delbecque JP, Bouguiyoud N, Di Giovanni G, et al. Serotonin in animal cognition and behavior. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(5):1649. doi:10.3390/ijms21051649 PMID:32121291
15. Näslund J, Hieronymus F, Emilsson JF, Lisinski A, Nilsson S, Eriksson E. Incidence of early anxiety aggravation in trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017;136(4):343-351. doi:10.1111/acps.12784 PMID:28556195.