ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS OF SELECTIVE SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS IN PATIENTS WITH DEPRESSION: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY FROM A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN RURAL INDIA
Main Article Content
Keywords
Adverse drug reactions; SSRIs; Depression; Escitalopram; Pharmacovigilance; Rural India.
Abstract
Background: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used as first-line treatment for depression; however, their adverse drug reaction (ADR) profile in rural Indian populations remains underreported. Understanding real-world safety patterns is crucial for optimizing therapeutic outcomes and strengthening pharmacovigilance in resource-limited settings.
Methods: This 12-month prospective observational study included drug-naïve adults with newly diagnosed depression attending a tertiary care hospital in rural Haryana. Patients prescribed SSRI monotherapy were followed at 3 and 6 weeks to identify ADRs using structured questionnaires and patient interviews. ADRs were evaluated using the WHO-UMC causality scale, Modified Hartwig and Siegel severity scale, and Schumock and Thornton preventability criteria. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.
Results: Among 51 patients (mean age: 34.8 ± 11.2 years), Escitalopram was the most frequently prescribed SSRI (60.8%) and accounted for the highest proportion of ADRs (57.1%). A total of 119 ADRs were reported, predominantly affecting the central nervous system (52.1%), followed by gastrointestinal manifestations (32.8%). The most common ADRs were headache (12.6%), dizziness (11.7%), nausea (10.9%), dry mouth (9.2%), and drowsiness (8.4%). All ADRs were categorized as “possible” on causality assessment. Most ADRs were mild (74.8%) and non-preventable (79.8%), while 25.2% were moderate and 20.2% were probably preventable. Tobacco use (p = 0.047) and tobacco/paan consumption (p = 0.032) showed significant associations with multiple ADR occurrence, whereas age, gender, BMI, and marital status showed no significant associations.
Conclusion: SSRIs demonstrated a favorable and largely manageable safety profile in this rural cohort, with predominantly mild central nervous system and gastrointestinal ADRs. The association of tobacco use with increased ADR frequency highlights the need for integrated lifestyle counseling. Strengthened patient education and enhanced pharmacovigilance practices may further improve treatment adherence and safety in rural Indian settings.
References
2. Gandhi PA, Kishore J. Prevalence of depression and the associated factors among the software professionals in Delhi: A cross-sectional study. Indian J Public Health. 2020;64(4):413-416. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_255_20
3. World Health Organization. Depression. WHO Fact Sheet. 2021 [cited 2024 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression
4. Koirala B, Rauniar G, Shakya D. Adverse effects including sexual problems associated with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in a tertiary care center of Eastern Nepal. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2015;4(4):651-656. doi:10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20150366
5. Bruton LL, Hilal-Dandan R, Knollmann BC. Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 13th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Education; 2018.
6. World Health Organization. International Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to Drugs: Adverse Reaction Terminology. Geneva: WHO; 1992. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/61056
7. Hu XH, Bull SA, Hunkeler EM, Ming E, Lee JY, Fireman B, et al. Incidence and duration of side effects and those rated as bothersome with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment for depression: patient report versus physician estimate. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65(7):959-965. doi:10.4088/jcp.v65n0712 PMID:15291684
8. Madhan R, Lucca J, Gurumurthy P, Dushad R. A prospective observational study to evaluate safety reporting of antidepressants at a tertiary care hospital in India. Indian J Pharmacol. 2014;46(5):543-547. doi:10.4103/0253-7613.140591 PMID:25298585
9. Pharmacovigilance Programme of India. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. Available from: https://www.ipc.gov.in/PvPI/pv_home.html
10. Shukla S, Sharma P, Gupta P, Pandey S, Agrawal R, Rathour D, et al. Current scenario and future prospects of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) monitoring and reporting mechanisms in the rural areas of India. Curr Drug Saf. 2024;19(2):172-190. doi:10.2174/1574886318666230428144120 PMID:37132145
11. Kushwaha V, Agrawal P, Singh S, Chaudhary D, Verma AK, Sharma H. Assessment of adverse drug reactions of antidepressant drugs used in psychiatry department of a tertiary care hospital. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2022;15(4):49-54. doi:10.22159/ajpcr. 2022.v15i4.44287
12. Jain C, Srivastava B, Agarwal RK. Safety profile of antidepressant drugs in tertiary care teaching hospital, Haldwani. Int J Toxicol Pharmacol Res. 2023;13(8):39-45. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8254343
13. Sisay T, Wami R. Adverse drug reactions among major depressive disorders: patterns by age and gender. Heliyon. 2021;7(12): e08655. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2021.e08655 PMID:34926896
14. Maideen NMP. Tobacco smoking and its drug interactions with comedications involving CYP and UGT enzymes and nicotine. World J Pharmacol. 2019;8(2):14-25. doi:10.5497/wjp. v8. i2.14
15. Sankhi S, Marasine NR, Sankhi S, Lamichhane R. Adverse drug reaction due to antidepressants among patients with depression in a private psychiatric hospital of Nepal. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:6682928. doi:10.1155/2020/6682928 PMID:32596329.
