COMPARISON OF THE RISK, BENEFIT AND PREGNANCY RATE OF LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY AND TRADITIONAL LAPAROTOMY IN UTERINE FIBROIDS PATIENTS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Fibroids, Laparoscopic myomectomy, Pregnancy, Traditional laparotomy
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic myomectomy has emerged as an efficacious and safe treatment option for management of uterine fibroids.
Purpose: The objective of this research was to compare both the safety and effectiveness of traditional laparotomy and laparoscopic myomectomy for women with uterine fibroids, as well as to find out their impact on the pregnancy rate following surgery.
Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at (Omomah center for endoscopic surgery and El Shefaa Hospital) and encompassed 80 patients with uterine fibroids in the period between January 2017 and January 2020. Cases who had laparoscopic myomectomy have been placed in group A (number=40), while those who underwent traditional laparotomy have been placed in group B (number=40).
Results: A statistically significant variance has been observed among both groups regarding time of surgery (p=0.039), and incidence of complications (p=0.03). There were highly statistically significant variances among both groups according to intra operative blood loss, post-operative hospitalization and VAS score (p<0.001). Laparoscopic myomectomy had a higher rate of pregnancy than traditional laparotomy at various time points (6, 12, 24, and 48 months) following surgery.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic myomectomy had positive effects over traditional laparotomy in terms of shorter surgery time, postoperative hospital stays, less intraoperative blood loss, VAS score, and lower incidence of complications, as well as a higher pregnancy rate.
References
2. Bhave Chittawar, P., Franik, S., Pouwer, A. W., & Farquhar, C. (2014). Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014(10), CD004638.
3. Chen, I., Lisonkova, S., Joseph, K. S., Williams, C., Yong, P., & Allaire, C. (2014). Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: practice patterns and health care use in British Columbia. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada: JOGC, 36(9), 817–821.
4. Choi, S. H., Hong, S., Kim, M., Bae, H. S., Kim, M. K., Kim, M. L., Jung, Y. W., Yun, B. S., & Seong, S. J. (2019). Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: the feasibility in single-site system. Obstetrics & gynecology science, 62(1), 56–64.
5. Donnez J., Dolmans M. M. (2016). Uterine fibroid management: from the present to the future. Hum. Reprod. Update. 22(6):665–686.
6. D'Silva, E. C., Muda, A. M., Safiee, A. I., & Ghazali, W. A. H. W. (2018). Five-Year Lapsed: Review of Laparoscopic Myomectomy versus Open Myomectomy in Putrajaya Hospital. Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy, 7(4), 161–166.
7. Fouda, U. M., Elsetohy, K. A., & Elshaer, H. S. (2016). Barbed Versus Conventional Suture: A Randomized Trial for Suturing the Endometrioma Bed After Laparoscopic Excision of Ovarian Endometrioma. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 23(6), 962–968.
8. Glaser, L. M., Friedman, J., Tsai, S., Chaudhari, A., & Milad, M. (2018). Laparoscopic myomectomy and morcellation: A review of techniques, outcomes, and practice guidelines. Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 46, 99–112.
9. Heller, G. Z., Manuguerra, M., & Chow, R. (2016). How to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale: Myths, truths and clinical relevance. Scand. J. Pain, 13(1), 67-75.
10. Jaramillo, S., Montane-Muntane, M., Gambus, P.L., Capitan, D., Navarro-Ripoll, R., Blasi, A. (2020). Perioperative blood loss: estimation of blood volume loss or haemoglobin mass loss? J. Blood Transfus, 18(1), 20.
11. Ji, L., Jin, L., & Hu, M. (2018). Laparoscopic Myomectomy with Temporary Bilateral Uterine Artery Occlusion Compared with Traditional Surgery for Uterine Myomas: Blood Loss and Recurrence. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 25(3), 434–439.
12. Laughlin-Tommaso S. K., Stewart E. A. (2018). Moving toward individualized medicine for uterine leiomyomas. Obstet. Gynecol. 132(4):961–971.
13. Shen, Q., Chen, M., Wang, Y., Zhou, Q., Tao, X., Zhang, W., & Zhu, X. (2015). Effects of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy on uterine leiomyoma: a meta-analysis. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 22(2), 177–184.
14. Sheyn, D., Bretschnieder, C. E., Mahajan, S. T., El-Nashar, S., Billow, M., & Ninivaggio, C. S. (2019). Comparison of 30-day Complication Rates between Laparoscopic Myomectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyoma in Women Older Than Age 40. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 26(6), 1076–1082.
15. Sohn, G. S., Cho, S., Kim, Y. M., Cho, C. H., Kim, M. R., Lee, S. R., & Working Group of Society of Uterine Leiomyoma (2018). Current medical treatment of uterine fibroids. Obstetrics & gynecology science, 61(2), 192–201.
16. Stewart E. A., Cookson C. L., Gandolfo R. A., Schulze-Rath R. (2017). Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. Bjog. 124(10):1501–1512.
17. Sunkara, S. K., Khairy, M., El-Toukhy, T., Khalaf, Y., & Coomarasamy, A. (2010). The effect of intramural fibroids without uterine cavity involvement on the outcome of IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 25(2), 418–429.
18. Tomasik, P., Bomba-Opon, D., Krupniewski, L., Palczewski, P., & Wielgos, M. (2014). Evaluation of uterine myomas during pregnancy using magnetic resonance imaging. Neuro endocrinology letters, 35(4), 262–264.
19. Venturella, R., Rocca, M. L., Lico, D., La Ferrera, N., Cirillo, R., Gizzo, S., Morelli, M., Zupi, E., & Zullo, F. (2016). In-bag manual versus uncontained power morcellation for laparoscopic myomectomy: randomized controlled trial. Fertility and sterility, 105(5), 1369–1376.
20. Wallace K., Zhang S., Thomas L., Stewart E.A., Nicholson W.K., Wegienka G.R., Wise L.A., Laughlin-Tommaso S.K., Diamond M.P., Marsh E.E., et al. Comparative effectiveness of hysterectomy versus myomectomy on one-year health-related quality of life in women with uterine fibroids. Fertil. Steril. 2020; 113:618–626.
