EVALUATION OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS AND PHARMACOVIGILANCE OUTCOMES IN T2DM PATIENTS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Pharmacovigilance, Adverse Drug Reactions, Naranjo Scale, Drug Safety, Polypharmacy
Abstract
Background: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic condition that frequently necessitates prolonged pharmacological treatment and is frequently complicated by polypharmacy and comorbid conditions. These components elevate the likelihood of adverse drug reactions that demand active pharmacovigilance to enhance drug safety and patient adherence. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out over duration of 2 years at a tertiary care teaching hospital located in Central India. ADRs were identified through clinical evaluation and assessed for causality, severity, and preventability. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were utilized for statistical evaluation. Results: ADRs were reported in 231 patients. Hypoglycemia (notably with sulfonylureas) and gastrointestinal disturbances (mainly with metformin) were the most common ADRs. The Naranjo assessment categorized 7.36% of ADRs were classified probable, 83.55 % possible, 9.09 % doubtful and 0% definite with 88.7 % mild, 10.4% moderate and only two severe reactions (0.9 % ) classified in severity. According to Schumock and Thornton criteria, 27.27 % were definitely preventable, 54.98% probably preventable and 17.75% not preventable. Conclusion: This research underscores a significant prevalence of ADRs in patients with T2DM, with many being preventable. Sulfonylureas and metformin were frequently implicated. Strengthening pharmacovigilance practices and promoting rational drug use are necessary for improving patient safety and therapeutic results in diabetes management.
References
2. Johansson KS, Jimenez-Solem E, Petersen TS, Christensen MB. Increasing medication use and polypharmacy in type 2 diabetes: the Danish experience from 2000 to 2020. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(12):2120-7. doi:10.2337/dc24-0011
3. Reddy P, Reddy TP, Patil N. Adverse drug reactions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective observational study. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2019;8(7):1472–1477. doi:10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20192634
4. Wiffen PJ, Gill M, Edwards J, Moore A. Adverse drug reactions in hospital patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;52(1):77–83. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01507.x
5. Kumaraswamy M, Mohan A, Chonari TA, Dahim M. Adverse Drug Reaction Tools Used in Causality Assessment. Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2023;16(4):281–288. doi: 10.5530/ijopp.16.4.50.
6. Khan Z, Karataş Y, Kıroğlu O. Evaluation of adverse drug reactions in paediatric patients: a retrospective study in Turkish hospital. Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 12;12:786182. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.786182; PMID: 34867695
7. Srinivasan A, Selvarajan S, Shivabasappa S, Arunmozhy S. A retrospective observational study of adverse drug reactions (ADR) reported to ADR Monitoring Centre from 2010 to 2020.Current DrugSafety 2025 Aug;20(3):349–60.
doi:10.2174/0115748863317987241015034413
8. Patel K, Ghate M, Moghe VV. Drug-related problems and adverse drug reactions in type 2 diabetes: a prospective Indian study. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021;46(2):356-62. doi:10.1111/jcpt.13310
9. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30(2):239-45. doi:10.1038/clpt.1981.154
10. Hartwig SC, Siegel J, Schneider PJ. Preventability and severity assessment in reporting adverse drug reactions. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992;49(9):2229-32. PMID: 1524068
11. Patel SR, Gupta SD, Patel KP, Malhotra SD, Patel PR. Analysis of adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care emergency medicine department: prevalence, preventability and reporting. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2018;7(9):1787–93. doi: 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20183531
12. Study of adverse drug reactions in patients with diabetes attending a tertiary care hospital. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2017;6(3):550-6. doi: 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20170786
13. Pharmacovigilance in India: present scenario and future challenges. Drug Saf. 2018; 41(9) : 839–48. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0664-4.