MORPHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE MASTOID REGION IN DRIED HUMAN SKULLS: IMPORTANCE IN OTOLOGIC AND SKULL BASE SURGERY

Main Article Content

Dr. Asma Zahoor
Dr. Ghulam Mohammad Bhat

Keywords

mastoid process, sexual dimorphism, otolaryngology, human skull, asterion, porion, surgical landmarks, skull base anatomy

Abstract

Background: The mastoid process, located behind the ear, plays a vital role in clinical and anatomical contexts. Its morphometric analysis is essential in forensic medicine, otology, and anthropometry. This study aimed to evaluate gender-based differences in mastoid morphometry. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College (GMC), Srinagar. A total of 102 adult dry skulls (60 males and 42 females) were included in the study. Various morphometric parameters, including mastoid length, medio-lateral diameter, antero-posterior diameter, mastoid process index, and intracranial distances (asterion to mastoidale, asterion to porion, and porion to mastoidale), were measured using standard caliper techniques. Results: Significant gender differences were observed. Males had a greater mastoid length (30.2 ± 3.4 mm) than females (25.1 ± 2.8 mm; p < 0.001). The medio-lateral and antero-posterior diameters were also higher in males (17.6 ± 2.1 mm and 20.3 ± 2.6 mm) compared to females (14.8 ± 1.9 mm and 16.9 ± 2.4 mm; p < 0.001). The mastoid process index did not differ significantly (p = 0.342). For intracranial distances, males had significantly larger measurements for asterion to mastoidale (48.7 ± 3.6 mm) compared to females (42.3 ± 3.2 mm, p < 0.001), asterion to porion (35.2 ± 2.9 mm in males vs. 31.7 ± 2.6 mm in females, p < 0.001), and porion to mastoidale (39.4 ± 3.1 mm in males vs. 34.8 ± 2.7 mm in females, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The study demonstrated significant gender differences in various morphometric parameters of the mastoid process, with males showing larger measurements. These findings have implications in forensic identification, cranial surgery, and other clinical settings. Further research is needed to understand the genetic and developmental factors contributing to these differences.

Abstract 86 | Pdf Downloads 9

References

1. Açar G, Emine Çiçekcibaşı A. Surgical Anatomy of the Temporal Bone [Internet]. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. IntechOpen; 2021. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93223
2. Mastoid E. Surgical anatomy of the ear. Textbook of Surgery. 2020;359.
3. Ars B, Dirckx J, Ars-Piret N, Buytaert J. Insights in the physiology of the human mastoid: message to the surgeon. The Journal of International Advanced Otology. 2012 May 1;8(2):296.
4. Aladeyelu OS, Olaniyi KS, Olojede SO, Mbatha WB, Sibiya AL, Rennie CO. Temporal bone pneumatization: A scoping review on the growth and size of mastoid air cell system with age. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269360.
5. Basuroy S, Goel L, De Sa C, Goel M, Varughese KM, Vernekar SM, Vijaykumar R. Association of Mastoid Pneumatization with Deviated Nasal Septum: A Clinicoradiological Study. Indian Journal of Otology. 2023 Apr 1;29(2):95-100.
6. Sultana Q, Ramos A, Jacob M, Quadras PR. Determination of Gender Based on Mastoid Measurements in South Indian Population. Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences. 2025 Jan 1;13(1):42-5.
7. Boussaid M, Brahim O, Bouanen I, Kenani M, Limem H, Mahjoub Y, Mesrati MA, Aissaoui A. Sex determination by Ct -scan analysis of the mastoid bone: A cross-sectional study. Heliyon. 2024 Jun 28;10(13):e33712. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33712. PMID: 39050434; PMCID: PMC11268172.
8. Mishra R, Gupta M, Rajni, Adhikari SR. Morphometric measurements of mastoid process for gender differentiation in dried skull. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2019;18(7):1-6.
9. Passey J, Mishra SR, Singh R, Sushobhna K, Singh S, Sinha P. Sex determination using mastoid process. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015 Jun 1;6(6):93-5.
10. Deepa MK, Chandragirish S, Chaithramani BS. Study on morphometry of mastoid process in adult dried human skulls and its importance in otolaryngology. Int J Acad Med Pharm. 2023;5(6):608-611.
11. Sukre SB, Chavan PR, Shewale SN. Morphometric analysis of mastoid process for sex determination among Marathwada population. MedPulse–International Journal of Anatomy. 2017 Feb;1(2):27-3.
12. Pillsbury HC, Carrasco VN. Revision mastoidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Sep;116(9):1019-22
13. Hadida Barzilai D, Tejman‐Yarden S, Yogev D, Vazhgovsky O, Nagar N, Sasson L, Sion‐Sarid R, Parmet Y, Goldfarb A, Ilan O. Augmented Reality‐Guided Mastoidectomy Simulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Surgical Proficiency. The Laryngoscope. 2025 Feb;135(2):894-900.
14. Vineeta S, Rashmi S, Rajesh KR, Satya NS, Tej BS and Sunil KT. Sex estimation from the Mastoid Process among North Indians. J Forensic Sci 2011; 1-6.
15. Nidugala H, Avadhani R, Bhaskar B. Mastoid process- A tool for sex determination, an anatomical study in South Indian skulls. International J Biomed Res 2013; 04(02): 106-10.

Most read articles by the same author(s)