A STUDY ON BIOFILM-MEDIATED MECHANISMS CONTRIBUTING TO MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE IN BACTERIAL PATHOGENS ISOLATED FROM EXTERNAL OCULAR INFECTIONS IN CENTRAL INDIA

Main Article Content

Mohit Kumar
Ruchi Gupta
Soumya Singh

Keywords

Biofilm formation, Multidrug resistance (MDR), Ocular pathogens, External ocular infections

Abstract

Background: External ocular infections are a significant health concern, particularly in pediatric populations and in patients with underlying comorbidities. The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and biofilm-producing pathogens further complicates treatment.


Objective: To identify the bacterial pathogens responsible for external ocular infections, assess their antibiotic susceptibility profiles, and explore the relationship between multidrug resistance and biofilm formation.


Methods: A total of 319 patients (mean age 21 years) presenting with external ocular infections were enrolled. Bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed using standard microbiological techniques and CLSI 2021 guidelines. Biofilm formation was assessed, and statistical analyses including multivariate logistic regression were conducted.


Results: Positive bacterial growth was obtained from 147 (46.1%) ocular specimens. Gram-positive bacteria accounted for 65.3% of isolates, with coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS, 27.9%) and Staphylococcus aureus (19.7%) being the most prevalent. Among Gram-negative bacteria (34.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.8%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (9.1%) predominated. Conjunctivitis was the most common clinical diagnosis (51.7%). Significant associations were found between bacterial infection and comorbid diabetes mellitus (AOR = 0.09, p = 0.002) and previous hospitalization (AOR = 0.10, p = 0.001). High levels of resistance were observed to penicillin (82.7%) and ampicillin (78.3%) among Gram-positive isolates, while Gram-negative bacteria showed resistance to ampicillin (90%) and tetracycline (73.5%). Ciprofloxacin and gentamicin remained effective against most isolates. MDR was observed in 68.7% of isolates, and 48.4% of MDR strains were strong biofilm producers, indicating a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.05).


Conclusion: The high prevalence of MDR and biofilm-producing bacteria in ocular infections underscores the need for ongoing surveillance and prudent antibiotic use. Fluoroquinolones and carbapenems remain effective, but rising resistance trends necessitate timely microbiological evaluation and targeted therapy.

Abstract 65 | Pdf Downloads 27

References

1. Ramesh S, Ramakrishnan R, Bharathi MJ, Amuthan M, Viswanathan S. Prevalence of bacterial pathogens causing ocular infections in South India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010;53:281–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0377-4929.64336
2. Mariotti SP, Pascolini D, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Trachoma: global magnitude of a preventable cause of blindness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(5):563–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.148494
3. Bertino JS Jr. Impact of antibiotic resistance in the management of ocular infections: the role of current and future antibiotics. Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:507–21. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s5778
4. Tesfaye T, Beyene G, Gelaw Y, Bekele S, Saravanan M. Bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of external ocular infections in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Am J Infect Dis Microbiol. 2013;1(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajidm-1-1-3
5. McDonald M, Blondeau JM. Emerging antibiotic resistance in ocular infections and the role of fluoroquinolones. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(9):1588–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.06.028
6. Sharma S. Antibiotic resistance in ocular bacterial pathogens. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2011;29(3):218–22. https://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.83903
7. Alhede M, Kragh KN, Qvortrup K, et al. Phenotypes of non-attached Pseudomonas aeruginosa aggregates resemble surface attached biofilm. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27943. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027943
8. Zegans ME, Becker HI, Budzik J, O’Toole G. The role of bacterial biofilms in ocular infections. DNA Cell Biol. 2002;21(5-6):415–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/10445490260099700
9. Anagaw B, Biadglegne F, Belyhun Y, Anagaw B, Mulu A. Bacteriology of ocular infections and antibiotic susceptibility pattern in Gondar University Hospital, North West Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J. 2011;49(49):117–23.
10. Lee KM, Lee HS, Kim MS. Two cases of corneal ulcer due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in high risk groups. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010;24(4):240–4. https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2010.24.4.240
11. Hemavathi SP, Shenoy P. Profile of microbial isolates in ophthalmic infections and antibiotic susceptibility of the bacterial isolates: a study in an eye care hospital, Bangalore. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:23–5. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2014/6852.3910
12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 30th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2021.
13. Harris AM, Bramley AM, Jain S, et al. Influence of antibiotics on the detection of bacteria by culture-based and culture-independent diagnostic tests in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx168
14. Sharma S. Diagnosis of infectious diseases of the eye. Eye (Lond). 2012;26(2):177–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2011.275
15. Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, et al. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;22(6):996–1006. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.22.6.996-1006.1985
16. Stepanović S, Vuković D, Dakić I, Savić B, Švabić-Vlahović M. A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J Microbiol Methods. 2000;40(2):175–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00122-6
17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard. 12th ed. CLSI document M02-A12. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2015.
18. Anteneh A, Tamirat A, Adane M, Demoze D, Endale E. Potential bacterial pathogens of external ocular infections and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern at Hawassa University Teaching and Referral Hospital, Southern Ethiopia. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2015;9:1012–9. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajmr2014.7282
19. Bharathi M, Ramakrishnan R, Shivakumar C, Meenakshi R, Lionalraj D. Etiology and antibacterial susceptibility pattern of community-acquired bacterial ocular infections in a tertiary eye care hospital in south India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010;58(6):497–507. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.71678
20. Okesola AO, Salako AO. Microbiological profile of bacterial conjunctivitis in Ibadan, Nigeria. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2010;8(8):20–4. https://doi.org/10.4314/aipm.v8i1.63953
21. Ubani U. Common bacterial isolates from infected eyes. J Niger Optom Assoc. 2009;15:40–7. https://doi.org/10.4314/jnoa.v15i1.55610
22. Sherwal BL, Verma AK. Epidemiology of ocular infection due to bacteria and fungus–A prospective study. JK Sci J Med Educ Res. 2008;10.
23. Shiferaw B, Gelaw B, Assefa A, Assefa Y, Addis Z. Bacterial isolates and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among patients with external ocular infections at Borumeda Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0078-z
24. Assefa Y, Moges F, Endris M, et al. Bacteriological profile and drug susceptibility patterns in dacryocystitis patients attending Gondar University Teaching Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0016-0
25. Perkins RE, Kundsin RB, Pratt MV, Abrahamsen I, Leibowitz HM. Bacteriology of normal and infected conjunctiva. J Clin Microbiol. 1975;1(2):147–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.1.2.147-149.1975