THE ROLE OF NASAL BONE ANATOMY IN OSTEOTOMY TECHNIQUE SELECTION DURING COSMETIC AND FUNCTIONAL RHINOPLASTY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Rhinoplasty, nasal bone anatomy, osteotomy, internal osteotomy, external osteotomy, ENT surgery, functional outcomes.
Abstract
Introduction: Rhinoplasty involves complicated surgery, and this involves advanced anatomical expertise, especially with regard to the nasal bones. The anatomy of the nasal bones determines, to a large extent, the design of the osteotomy and thus not only cosmesis but also nasal performance.
Objective: The purpose of the research was to evaluate how variations of the nasal bones' structure affect the selection of the method of osteotomy in the cosmetic and functional surgery of the nose.
Material and Method: The prospective study was undertaken at Al-Tibri Medical College and hospital located in Karachi during the period January, 2024 June, 2024. These nasal bone types were applied in classifying the patients (sixty patients in number) going through rhinoplasty, which were reviewed using the preoperative CT scans. The patient was anatomically assessed, and both internal and external osteotomy were carried out. The postoperative functional and aesthetic outcomes of the study were contrasted using the objective measurement of airflow and a satisfaction survey.
Results: Internal osteotomy was chosen in those with narrow and symmetric bone in the nose, and external osteotomy was selected in those with wide and deviated bones. The technique of assessing the anatomy paid off more, as there was more satisfaction with patients and an enhanced functionality.
Conclusion: The anatomy of the nasal bones is critical in the choice of osteotomy technique. Anatomy-based solutions made to fit an individual result in a better aesthetic and functional outcome in applications of rhinoplasty.
References
2- Szychta P. Optimizing precision rhinoplasty: comprehensive preoperative planning with nasal computed tomography for functional and aesthetic enhancement. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2024 Mar 25;46(1):10.
3- Wick EH, Whipple ME, Hohman MH, Moe KS. Computer-aided rhinoplasty using a novel “navigated” nasal osteotomy technique: a pilot study. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. 2021 Oct;130(10):1148-55.
4- Jeong JY, Kim TK, Ku I, Najmiddinov B. Nasal Osteotomies Revisited in Asians: Surface Aesthetics, Anatomical and Technical Considerations. Archives of Plastic Surgery. 2024 Jan;51(01):002-13.
5- Bafaqeeh SA, Muluk NB, Cingi C. Are preservation rhinoplasty techniques safer than structural ones?. European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences. 2023 Oct 2;27.
6- Sabaa MA, Elfouly MS, Elemam AM. Comparative study between different types of intermediate osteotomies in twisted nose deformity management: a randomized controlled trial. The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology. 2024 May 27;40(1):57.
7- ROCHA PR. Efficacy of structured and conventional techniques on aesthetic and corrective rhinoplasty. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica. 2023 May 29;32:28-36.
8- Zucchini S, Brancatelli S, Piccinato A, Marcuzzo AV, Bianchi M, Tirelli G. Evaluation of surgical outcome in rhinoplasty: a comparison between rasp and osteotome in dorsal hump removal. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal. 2021 Sep;100(5_suppl):436S-42S.
9- Eisa SH, Eldesoky MI, Elawamry MI, El-Nagar MA. Functional and aesthetic outcomes in different methods of open septorhinoplasty. Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal. 2025 Jan 1;23(1):104-10.
10- Olate S, Henriquez M, Guevara HG, Haidar ZS, Ravelo V, Pablo Alister J. Anatomical Conditions in Simultaneous Orthognathic Surgery and Structural Rhinoplasty. A Clinical Series. International Journal of Morphology. 2023 Nov 1;41(6).
11- Agdoğan Ö, Ersözlü T. The Impact of Scroll Ligament Preservation on Nasal Airway Patency in Rhinoplasty: An Objective Study with Rhinomanometry and Acoustic Rhinometry. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2024 Sep 3:1-1.
12- Gupta R, John J, Ranganathan N, Stepanian R, Gupta M, Hart J, Nossoni F, Shaheen K, Folbe A, Chaiyasate K. Outcomes of closed versus open rhinoplasty: a systematic review. Archives of plastic surgery. 2022 Sep;49(05):569-79.
13- Azizli E, Oğuz O, Bayar Muluk N, Sarı H, Dilber M, Uyar Y, Cingi CE. Applied surgical methods and outcomes in crooked nose rhinoplasty. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Oct 1;27(5 Suppl):1-5.
14- Tremp M, Schneider J, Raghu RB, Goksel A, Saban Y. A systematic analysis of the nasal septum in crooked noses and suggested treatment algorithm according to preservation rhinoplasty (PR) principles. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2023 Aug;47(4):1499-507.
15- Schlegel L, Malani E, Belko S, Kumar A, Barbarite E, Krein H, Heffelfinger R, Hutchinson M, Pugliese R. Design, printing optimization, and material testing of a 3D-printed nasal osteotomy task trainer. 3D printing in medicine. 2023 Jul 13;9(1):20.
16- Tham T, Bhuiya S, Wong A, Zhu D, Romo T, Georgolios A. Clinical outcomes in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty: a meta-analysis. Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine. 2022 Jun 1;25(3):187-94.
17- Meretsky CR, Polychronis A, Clark D, Liovas D, Schiuma AT. Advantages and Disadvantages of Reconstructive and Preservation Rhinoplasty: Surgical Techniques, Outcomes, and Future Directions. Cureus. 2024 Sep 9;16(9).
18- Verkest V, Pingnet L, Van Hout G, Fransen E, Declau F. Comparison in patient satisfaction between structural component and hybrid t-bar preservation rhinoplasty: a retrospective propensity score matched cohort study. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2023 Dec;47(6):2598-608.
19- Nikparto N, Yari A, Mehraban SH, Bigdelou M, Asadi A, Darehdor AA, Nezaminia S, Khani M, Hakim LK, Eskandari F, Erfani M. The current techniques in dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty: a comprehensive review. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2024 Apr 28;46(1):16.