MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF IATROGENIC BILE DUCT INJURIES FOLLOWING OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Main Article Content

Imam Bakash
Fida Ahmed
Asghar Ali
Irshad Ahmed
Saiqa Rafiq
Nazia Naseer

Keywords

Iatrogenic bile duct injury, Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy, Cholecystectomy, Postoperative complications

Abstract

Background: Iatrogenic bile duct injury (IBDI) is a rare but dangerous side effect of cholecystectomy, especially as laparoscopic procedures become more widespread. If not identified and treated right away, these injuries might result in serious morbidity. Improving patient outcomes requires knowing how frequently various surgical repair options occur and how effective they are.


Study design: Descriptive study Design


Duration and place of study: This study was conducted in Mekran Medical College Turbat at Kech Balochistan from January 2023 to January 2025


Objective: The present study aims at the determination of the frequency as well as outcomes of the IBDI followed by open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures.


Methods: This case series was descriptive and included 120 patients who presented with IBDI. Laboratory tests, clinical examinations, and selected imaging utilising MRCP and ERCP were used to assess the patients. Surgical procedures included primary repair over a T-tube, choledochoduodenostomy, or Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy, depending on the type of lesion. For six months, patients were tracked and postoperative improvement was tracked.


Results: 72 (60%) of the 120 patients were referred from peripheral centres, while 48 (40%) of the patients had injuries locally. Females outnumbered males (M:F = 1:4), and the average age was 40.56 ± 3.66 years. Bile leakage, stomach discomfort, and jaundice were the most frequent presenting symptoms. Choledochoduodenostomy (25%) and primary repair over T-tube (10%) were the next most common procedures, after Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy (65%). Among the complications were recurrent cholangitis (5%), wound infection (15%), and bile leak (10%). A typical hospital stay lasted between 10 and 15 days.


Conclusion: Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy is a reliable and preferable technique for the management of the IBID with least chances of postoperative complications. Early diagnosis and surgical intervention are crucial for optimal patient outcomes.

Abstract 68 | pdf Downloads 30

References

1. Shea JA, Berlin JA, Bachwich DR, Staroscik RN, Malet PF, McGuckin M, et al. Indications for and outcomes of cholecystectomy: a comparison of the pre and postlaparoscopic eras. Ann Surg. 1998;227(3):343–350.
2. Peters JH, Gibbons GD, Innes JT, et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1991;5(6):345–352.
3. Archer SB, Brown DW, Smith CD, Branum GD, Hunter JG. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg. 2001;234(4):549–558.
4. Stewart L, Way LW. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Factors that influence the results of treatment. Arch Surg. 1995;130(10):1123–1128.
5. Flum DR, Koepsell T, Heagerty P, Sinanan M, Dellinger EP. The nationwide frequency of major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2003;188(1):1–7.
6. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4292 hospitals and an analysis of 77604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993;165(1):9–14.
7. Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, et al. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg. 2003;237(4):460–469.
8. Strasberg SM. Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 2. Changing the culture of cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(4):604–611.
9. Stewart L. Iatrogenic biliary injuries: identification, classification, and management. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(2):297–310.
10. Sicklick JK, Camp MS, Lillemoe KD, et al. Surgical management of bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2005;241(5):786–792.
11. Lau WY, Lai EC. Classification of iatrogenic bile duct injury. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007;6(5):459–463.
12. Barkun AN, Rezieg M, Mehta SN, et al. The role of ERCP in the management of bile duct injuries. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1998;8(3):533–544.
13. Han HS, Cho JY, Yoon YS, et al. MRCP findings of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: correlation with clinical outcome. Clin Radiol. 2004;59(4):377–383.
14. Connor S, Garden OJ. Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2006;93(2):158–168.
15. Walsh RM, Henderson JM, Vogt DP, et al. Long-term outcome of biliary reconstruction for bile duct injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery. 2007;142(4):450–456.
16. Singh O, Singh R, Gupta A, Garg P, Choudhury SR, Singh PK. Clinical presentation and management of bile duct injuries after cholecystectomy. Int J Surg. 2016;29:73-77.
17. Patel MS, Yadav RK, Pandya HJ, Shah HK. Pattern and outcome of bile duct injuries following cholecystectomy: experience from a tertiary care center. J Surg Res. 2015;197(2):384-390.
18. Azhar R, Khan J, Malik A, et al. Long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct injuries. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017;24(8):412-417.
19. Ramia JM, Avila M, Espin-Basany E, et al. Surgical management of iatrogenic bile duct injuries: factors influencing outcomes. World J Surg. 2019;43(7):1781-1787.
20. Weber A, Fuhrmann V, Jonas S, et al. Postoperative bile leak and wound infection following bile duct reconstruction. Ann Hepatol. 2018;17(5):816-822.
21. Kapoor V, Kumar A, Sharma A, et al. Complications after surgical repair of bile duct injuries: a tertiary center experience. Indian J Surg. 2020;82(4):744-749.
22. Bektas H, Kayacetin E, Bozkurt S, et al. Outcomes of bile duct injury repair in tertiary care center. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2015;26(5):435-440.

Most read articles by the same author(s)