Ferrule effect and its importance in restorative dentistry: A literature Review
Main Article Content
Keywords
Ferrule, Root canal treated teeth, Types of ferrules
Abstract
This review aims to report the current literature on the status of ferrule in root-filled teeth, classify the dif-ferent types of ferrules, highlight the biomechanical failures due to inadequate ferrule effect, and discuss the current restorative concepts according to the ferrule design principles.
References
1. Samet N, and Jotkowitz A. Classification and prognosis evaluation of individual teeth – a com-prehensive approach. Quintessence Int. 2009; 40: 377–387.
2. Esteves H, Correia A, and Araújo F. Classification of extensively damaged teeth to evaluate progno-sis. J Can Dent Assoc. 2011; 77: b105.
3. Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, et al. Ferrule effect: a literature review. J Endod. 2012; 38: 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.024
4. Eliyas S, Jalili J, and Martin N. Restoration of the root canal treated tooth. Br Dent J. 2015; 218: 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.27
5. Sorenson JA, and Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63: 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90070-S
6. Cohen S, and Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the pulp. 12th ed. Mosby Elsevier USA; 2020.
7. Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, et al. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature – part 1. Composition and micro-and macrostructure alterations. Quintessence Int. 2007; 38: 733–743.
8. Schwartz RS, and Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a liter-ature review. J Endod. 2004; 30: 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001
9. Fernandes AS, and Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14: 355–363.
10. Bru E, Forner L, Llena C, et al. Fibre post behaviour prediction factors. A review of the literature. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013; 5(3): e150–e153. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.50619
11. Clark D, and Khademi J. Modern molar endodon-tic access and directed dentin conservation. Dent Clin North Am. 2010; 54: 249–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2010.01.001
12. Isidor F, Brøndum K, and Ravnholt G. The influ-ence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1999; 12: 78–82.
13. Libman WJ, and Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1995; 8: 155–161.
14. Stankiewicz NR, and Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J. 2002; 35(7): 575–581. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00557.x
15. Akkayan B. An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-re-inforced and zirconia dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92: 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.04.027
16. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fadda GM, et al. A ran-domized controlled trial of endodonti-cally treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res. 2012; 91(7 Suppl): 72S–78S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512447949
17. Al-Wahadni A, and Gutteridge DL. An in vitro investigation into the effects of retained coro-nal dentine on the strength of a tooth restored with a cemented post and partial core resto-ration. Int Endod J. 2002; 35: 913–9
18. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00596.x
18. Ma PS, Nicholls JI, Junge T, et al. Load fatigue of teeth with different ferrule lengths, restored with fiber posts, composite resin cores, and all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 102: 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60159-1
19. Cho H, Michalakis KX, Kim Y, et al. Impact of interproximal groove placement and remain-ing coronal tooth structure on the fracture resis-tance of endodontically treated maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthodont. 2009; 18: 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00379.x
20. Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Lenz J, et al. Teeth restored using fiber-reinforced posts: in vitro fracture tests and finite element analysis. Acta Biomater. 2010; 6: 3747–3754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.012
21. Naumann M, Preuss A, and Rosentritt M. Effect of incomplete crown ferrules on load capacity of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with fiber posts, composite build-ups, and all-ce-ramic crowns: an in vitro evaluation after chewing simulation. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006; 64: 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350500331120
22. Dikbas I, Tanalp J, Ozel E, et al. Evaluation of the effect of different ferrule designs on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary cen-tral incisors incorporating fiber posts, composite cores and crown restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007; 8: 62–69. https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-8-7-62
23. Endhilnathan D, and Nayar S. The effect of post-core and ferrule on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. Indian J Dent Res. 2008; 19: 17–21. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.38926
24. Milto P, and Stein RS. Root fracture in endodon-tically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90405-Y
25. Ng CC, al-Bayat MI, Dumbrigue HB, et al. Effect of no ferrule on failure of teeth restored with bonded posts and cores. Gen Dent. 2004; 52: 143–146.
26. Hinckfuss S, and Wilson PR. Effect of core mate-rial and restoration design on strength of endodon-tically treated bovine teeth: a laboratory study. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17: 456–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00324.x
27. Pilo R, and Tamse A. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83: 617–623. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.106552
28. Peroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange KP, et al. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores – a review. Quintessence Int. 2005; 36: 737–746.
29. Joseph J, and Ramachandran G. Fracture resis-tance of dowel channel preparations with various dentin thickness. Fed Oper Dent. 1990; 1: 32–35.
30. Gupta KL. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: Why, when and how. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing; 2011.
31. Meng QF, Chen YM, Guang HB, et al. Effect of a ferrule and increased clinical crown length on the in vitro fracture resistance of premolars restored using two dowel- and-core systems. Oper Dent. 2007; 32: 595–601. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-169
32. Gegauff AG. Effect of crown lengthening and ferrule placement on static load failure of cemented cast post-cores and crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84: 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.107583
33. Ng CC, Dumbrigue HB, Al-Bayat MI, et al. Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.026
34. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, and Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res. 1989; 68: 1540–1544. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680111401
35. Jagadish S, and Yogesh BG. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior com-posite, and glass cermet restorations. Oper Dent. 1990; 15: 42–47.
36. Hürmüzlü F, Kiremitçi A, Serper A, et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premo-lars restored with ormocer and packable com-posite. J Endod. 2003; 29: 838–840. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200312000-00014
37. Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. Am J Dent. 1997; 10: 237–241.
38. Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, and Orban B. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontol. 1961; 32: 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1961.32.3.261
39. Hamasni FM, and El Hajj F. Comparison of the clinical biological width with the published standard histologic mean values. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017; 7: 264–271.
40. Jorgic-Srdjak K, Plancak D, Maricevic T, et al. Periodontal and prosthetic aspect of biological width part I: violation of biologic width. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2000; 34: 195–197.
41. Fugazzotto PA, and Parma-Benfenati S. Preprosthetic periodontal considerations. Crown length and biologic width. Quintessence Int Dent Dig. 1984; 15: 1247–1256.
42. Martin W, Taylor C, Jawad S, et al. Modern end-odontic principles part 7: the restorative inter-face. Dent Update. 2016; 43: 319–320. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2016.43.4.319
43. Nugala B, Kumar BS, Sahitya S, et al. Biologic width and its importance in periodontal and restor-ative dentistry. J Conserv Dent. 2012; 15: 12–17. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.92599
44. Kois J. Altering gingival levels: the restor-ative connection, part 1: biologic variables. J Esthet Dent. 1994; 6: 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1994.tb00825.x
45. Schmidt JC, Sahrmann P, Weiger R, et al. Biologic width dimensions – a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2013; 40: 493–504.https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12078
46. Kosyfaki P, del Pilar Pinilla Martín M, and Strub JR. Relationship between crowns and the periodontium: a literature update. Quintessence Int. 2010; 41: 109–126.
47. Goodacre CJ. Designing tooth preparations for optimal success. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48: 359–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.015
48. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, et al. The effect of ferrule presence and type of dowel on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with metal-ceramic crowns. J Conserv Dent. 2014; 17: 183–187. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.128053
49. Juloski J, Apicella D, and Ferrari M. The effect of ferrule height on stress distribution within a tooth restored with fibre posts and ceramic crown: a finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2014; 30: 1304–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.09.004
50. Abdulrazzak SS, Sulaiman E, Atiya BK, et al. Effect of ferrule height and glass fibre post length on fracture resistance and failure mode of end-odontically treated teeth. Aust Endod J. 2014; 40: 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12042
51. Pereira JR, de Ornelas F, Conti PC, et al. Effect of a crown ferrule on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefab-ricated posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.019
52. Al-Omiri MK, and Al-Wahadni AM. An ex-vivo study of the effects of retained coronal dentine on the strength of teeth restored with compos-ite core and different post and core systems. Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 890–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01166.x
53. Mamoun JS. On the ferrule effect and the bio-mechanical stability of teeth restored with cores, posts, and crowns. Eur J Dent. 2014; 8: 281–286. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.130639
54. Poiate IA, Vasconcellos AB, Poiate E, Jr, et al. Stress distribution in the cervical region of an upper central incisor in a 3D finite element model. Braz Oral Res. 2009; 23: 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000200012
55. Tan PL, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, et al. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated cen-tral incisors with varying ferrule heights and configurations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93: 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.01.013
56. Al-Omiri MK, Rayyan MR, and Abu-Hammad O. Stress analysis of endodontically treated teeth restored with post-retained crowns: a finite ele-ment analysis study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011; 142: 289–300. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0168
57. Michael CG, Javid NS, Colaizzi FA, et al. Biting strength and chewing forces in complete den-ture wearers. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63: 549–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90074-M
58. Haraldson T, Karlsson U, and Carlsson GE. Bite force and oral function in complete denture wear-ers. J Oral Rehabil. 1979; 6: 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1979.tb00403.x
59. McLean A. Predictably restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Can Dent Assoc. 1998; 64: 782–787.
60. Morgano SM, Rodrigues AH, and Sabrosa CE. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48: 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.011
61. Sorensen JA, and Martinoff JT. Endodontically treated teeth as abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53: 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90008-3
62. Nyman S, and Lindhe J. Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with advanced periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 1976; 3: 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1976.tb01861.x
63. Gupta N, Taneja S, and Bhalla VK. Evaluating effect of ferrule height, configuration, and post and core approaches on stress distribution of flared root canal: a three-dimensional finite element anal-ysis. Saudi Endod J. 2021; 11: 308–314.
64. Smukler H, and Chaibi M. Periodontal and den-tal considerations in clinical crown extension: a rational basis for treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997; 17: 464–477.
65. Kocadereli I, Taşman F, and Güner SB. Combined endodontic-orthodontic and prost-hodontic treatment of fractured teeth. Case report. Aust Dent J. 1998; 43: 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00148.x
66. Trushkowsky RD. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: criteria and technique consider-ations. Quintessence Int. 2014; 45: 557–567.
67. Meng QF, Chen LJ, Meng J, et al. Fracture resis-tance after simulated crown lengthening and forced tooth eruption of endodontically-treated teeth restored with a fiber post-and- core system. Am J Dent. 2009; 22: 147–150.
68. Camargo PM, Melnick PR, and Camargo LM. Clinical crown lengthening in the esthetic zone. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007; 35: 487–498.
69. Malmgren O, Malmgren B, and Frykholm A. Rapid orthodontic extrusion of crown root and cervical root fractured teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991; 7: 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1991.tb00183.x
70. Zitzmann NU, Krastl G, Hecker H, et al. Strategic considerations in treatment planning: deciding when to treat, extract, or replace a questionable tooth. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 104: 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60096-0
71. Patzelt SB, Bahat O, Reynolds MA, et al. The all-on-four treatment concept: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 16: 836–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12068
72. Magne P, and Belser UC. Porcelain versus com-posite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flex-ure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23: 543–555.
73. Cobankara FK, Unlu N, Cetin AR, et al. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars. Oper Dent. 2008; 33: 526–533. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-132
74. Galgali SR, and Gontiya G. Evaluation of an inno-vative radiographic technique- parallel profile radiography- to determine the dimensions of the dentogingival unit. Indian J Dent Res. 2011; 22: 237–241. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.84294
75. Freeman K, Bebermeyer R, Moretti A, et al. Single-tooth crown lengthening by the restorative dentist: a case report. J Greater Houston Dent Soc. 2000; 2: 14–16.
76. Ramírez-Sebastià A, Bortolotto T, Cattani-Lorente M, et al. Adhesive restoration of anterior endodon-tically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18: 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0978-3
77. Lawn BR, Pajares A, Zhang Y, et al. Materials design in the performance of all-ceramic crowns. Biomaterials. 2004; 25: 2885–2892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.050
78. D’Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini M, et al. In vitro fracture resistance and deflection of pulpless teeth restored with fiber posts and prepared for veneers. J Endod. 2008; 34: 838–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.026
79. Nayyar A, Walton R, and Leonard L. An amal-gam coronal-radicular dowel and core tech-nique for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1980; 43: 511–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90322-4
80. Sorrentino R, Salameh Z, Zarone F, et al. Effect of post-retained composite restoration of MOD preparations on the fracture resistance of endodon-tically treated teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 49–56.
2. Esteves H, Correia A, and Araújo F. Classification of extensively damaged teeth to evaluate progno-sis. J Can Dent Assoc. 2011; 77: b105.
3. Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, et al. Ferrule effect: a literature review. J Endod. 2012; 38: 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.024
4. Eliyas S, Jalili J, and Martin N. Restoration of the root canal treated tooth. Br Dent J. 2015; 218: 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.27
5. Sorenson JA, and Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63: 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90070-S
6. Cohen S, and Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the pulp. 12th ed. Mosby Elsevier USA; 2020.
7. Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, et al. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature – part 1. Composition and micro-and macrostructure alterations. Quintessence Int. 2007; 38: 733–743.
8. Schwartz RS, and Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a liter-ature review. J Endod. 2004; 30: 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001
9. Fernandes AS, and Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14: 355–363.
10. Bru E, Forner L, Llena C, et al. Fibre post behaviour prediction factors. A review of the literature. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013; 5(3): e150–e153. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.50619
11. Clark D, and Khademi J. Modern molar endodon-tic access and directed dentin conservation. Dent Clin North Am. 2010; 54: 249–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2010.01.001
12. Isidor F, Brøndum K, and Ravnholt G. The influ-ence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1999; 12: 78–82.
13. Libman WJ, and Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1995; 8: 155–161.
14. Stankiewicz NR, and Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J. 2002; 35(7): 575–581. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00557.x
15. Akkayan B. An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-re-inforced and zirconia dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92: 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.04.027
16. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fadda GM, et al. A ran-domized controlled trial of endodonti-cally treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res. 2012; 91(7 Suppl): 72S–78S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512447949
17. Al-Wahadni A, and Gutteridge DL. An in vitro investigation into the effects of retained coro-nal dentine on the strength of a tooth restored with a cemented post and partial core resto-ration. Int Endod J. 2002; 35: 913–9
18. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00596.x
18. Ma PS, Nicholls JI, Junge T, et al. Load fatigue of teeth with different ferrule lengths, restored with fiber posts, composite resin cores, and all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 102: 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60159-1
19. Cho H, Michalakis KX, Kim Y, et al. Impact of interproximal groove placement and remain-ing coronal tooth structure on the fracture resis-tance of endodontically treated maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthodont. 2009; 18: 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00379.x
20. Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Lenz J, et al. Teeth restored using fiber-reinforced posts: in vitro fracture tests and finite element analysis. Acta Biomater. 2010; 6: 3747–3754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.012
21. Naumann M, Preuss A, and Rosentritt M. Effect of incomplete crown ferrules on load capacity of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with fiber posts, composite build-ups, and all-ce-ramic crowns: an in vitro evaluation after chewing simulation. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006; 64: 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350500331120
22. Dikbas I, Tanalp J, Ozel E, et al. Evaluation of the effect of different ferrule designs on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary cen-tral incisors incorporating fiber posts, composite cores and crown restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007; 8: 62–69. https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-8-7-62
23. Endhilnathan D, and Nayar S. The effect of post-core and ferrule on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. Indian J Dent Res. 2008; 19: 17–21. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.38926
24. Milto P, and Stein RS. Root fracture in endodon-tically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90405-Y
25. Ng CC, al-Bayat MI, Dumbrigue HB, et al. Effect of no ferrule on failure of teeth restored with bonded posts and cores. Gen Dent. 2004; 52: 143–146.
26. Hinckfuss S, and Wilson PR. Effect of core mate-rial and restoration design on strength of endodon-tically treated bovine teeth: a laboratory study. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17: 456–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00324.x
27. Pilo R, and Tamse A. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83: 617–623. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.106552
28. Peroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange KP, et al. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores – a review. Quintessence Int. 2005; 36: 737–746.
29. Joseph J, and Ramachandran G. Fracture resis-tance of dowel channel preparations with various dentin thickness. Fed Oper Dent. 1990; 1: 32–35.
30. Gupta KL. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: Why, when and how. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing; 2011.
31. Meng QF, Chen YM, Guang HB, et al. Effect of a ferrule and increased clinical crown length on the in vitro fracture resistance of premolars restored using two dowel- and-core systems. Oper Dent. 2007; 32: 595–601. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-169
32. Gegauff AG. Effect of crown lengthening and ferrule placement on static load failure of cemented cast post-cores and crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84: 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.107583
33. Ng CC, Dumbrigue HB, Al-Bayat MI, et al. Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.026
34. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, and Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res. 1989; 68: 1540–1544. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680111401
35. Jagadish S, and Yogesh BG. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior com-posite, and glass cermet restorations. Oper Dent. 1990; 15: 42–47.
36. Hürmüzlü F, Kiremitçi A, Serper A, et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premo-lars restored with ormocer and packable com-posite. J Endod. 2003; 29: 838–840. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200312000-00014
37. Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. Am J Dent. 1997; 10: 237–241.
38. Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, and Orban B. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontol. 1961; 32: 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1961.32.3.261
39. Hamasni FM, and El Hajj F. Comparison of the clinical biological width with the published standard histologic mean values. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017; 7: 264–271.
40. Jorgic-Srdjak K, Plancak D, Maricevic T, et al. Periodontal and prosthetic aspect of biological width part I: violation of biologic width. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2000; 34: 195–197.
41. Fugazzotto PA, and Parma-Benfenati S. Preprosthetic periodontal considerations. Crown length and biologic width. Quintessence Int Dent Dig. 1984; 15: 1247–1256.
42. Martin W, Taylor C, Jawad S, et al. Modern end-odontic principles part 7: the restorative inter-face. Dent Update. 2016; 43: 319–320. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2016.43.4.319
43. Nugala B, Kumar BS, Sahitya S, et al. Biologic width and its importance in periodontal and restor-ative dentistry. J Conserv Dent. 2012; 15: 12–17. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.92599
44. Kois J. Altering gingival levels: the restor-ative connection, part 1: biologic variables. J Esthet Dent. 1994; 6: 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1994.tb00825.x
45. Schmidt JC, Sahrmann P, Weiger R, et al. Biologic width dimensions – a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2013; 40: 493–504.https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12078
46. Kosyfaki P, del Pilar Pinilla Martín M, and Strub JR. Relationship between crowns and the periodontium: a literature update. Quintessence Int. 2010; 41: 109–126.
47. Goodacre CJ. Designing tooth preparations for optimal success. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48: 359–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.015
48. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, et al. The effect of ferrule presence and type of dowel on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with metal-ceramic crowns. J Conserv Dent. 2014; 17: 183–187. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.128053
49. Juloski J, Apicella D, and Ferrari M. The effect of ferrule height on stress distribution within a tooth restored with fibre posts and ceramic crown: a finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2014; 30: 1304–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.09.004
50. Abdulrazzak SS, Sulaiman E, Atiya BK, et al. Effect of ferrule height and glass fibre post length on fracture resistance and failure mode of end-odontically treated teeth. Aust Endod J. 2014; 40: 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12042
51. Pereira JR, de Ornelas F, Conti PC, et al. Effect of a crown ferrule on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefab-ricated posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.019
52. Al-Omiri MK, and Al-Wahadni AM. An ex-vivo study of the effects of retained coronal dentine on the strength of teeth restored with compos-ite core and different post and core systems. Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 890–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01166.x
53. Mamoun JS. On the ferrule effect and the bio-mechanical stability of teeth restored with cores, posts, and crowns. Eur J Dent. 2014; 8: 281–286. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.130639
54. Poiate IA, Vasconcellos AB, Poiate E, Jr, et al. Stress distribution in the cervical region of an upper central incisor in a 3D finite element model. Braz Oral Res. 2009; 23: 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000200012
55. Tan PL, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, et al. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated cen-tral incisors with varying ferrule heights and configurations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93: 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.01.013
56. Al-Omiri MK, Rayyan MR, and Abu-Hammad O. Stress analysis of endodontically treated teeth restored with post-retained crowns: a finite ele-ment analysis study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011; 142: 289–300. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0168
57. Michael CG, Javid NS, Colaizzi FA, et al. Biting strength and chewing forces in complete den-ture wearers. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63: 549–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90074-M
58. Haraldson T, Karlsson U, and Carlsson GE. Bite force and oral function in complete denture wear-ers. J Oral Rehabil. 1979; 6: 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1979.tb00403.x
59. McLean A. Predictably restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Can Dent Assoc. 1998; 64: 782–787.
60. Morgano SM, Rodrigues AH, and Sabrosa CE. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48: 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.011
61. Sorensen JA, and Martinoff JT. Endodontically treated teeth as abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53: 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90008-3
62. Nyman S, and Lindhe J. Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with advanced periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 1976; 3: 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1976.tb01861.x
63. Gupta N, Taneja S, and Bhalla VK. Evaluating effect of ferrule height, configuration, and post and core approaches on stress distribution of flared root canal: a three-dimensional finite element anal-ysis. Saudi Endod J. 2021; 11: 308–314.
64. Smukler H, and Chaibi M. Periodontal and den-tal considerations in clinical crown extension: a rational basis for treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997; 17: 464–477.
65. Kocadereli I, Taşman F, and Güner SB. Combined endodontic-orthodontic and prost-hodontic treatment of fractured teeth. Case report. Aust Dent J. 1998; 43: 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00148.x
66. Trushkowsky RD. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: criteria and technique consider-ations. Quintessence Int. 2014; 45: 557–567.
67. Meng QF, Chen LJ, Meng J, et al. Fracture resis-tance after simulated crown lengthening and forced tooth eruption of endodontically-treated teeth restored with a fiber post-and- core system. Am J Dent. 2009; 22: 147–150.
68. Camargo PM, Melnick PR, and Camargo LM. Clinical crown lengthening in the esthetic zone. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007; 35: 487–498.
69. Malmgren O, Malmgren B, and Frykholm A. Rapid orthodontic extrusion of crown root and cervical root fractured teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991; 7: 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1991.tb00183.x
70. Zitzmann NU, Krastl G, Hecker H, et al. Strategic considerations in treatment planning: deciding when to treat, extract, or replace a questionable tooth. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 104: 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60096-0
71. Patzelt SB, Bahat O, Reynolds MA, et al. The all-on-four treatment concept: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 16: 836–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12068
72. Magne P, and Belser UC. Porcelain versus com-posite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flex-ure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23: 543–555.
73. Cobankara FK, Unlu N, Cetin AR, et al. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars. Oper Dent. 2008; 33: 526–533. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-132
74. Galgali SR, and Gontiya G. Evaluation of an inno-vative radiographic technique- parallel profile radiography- to determine the dimensions of the dentogingival unit. Indian J Dent Res. 2011; 22: 237–241. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.84294
75. Freeman K, Bebermeyer R, Moretti A, et al. Single-tooth crown lengthening by the restorative dentist: a case report. J Greater Houston Dent Soc. 2000; 2: 14–16.
76. Ramírez-Sebastià A, Bortolotto T, Cattani-Lorente M, et al. Adhesive restoration of anterior endodon-tically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18: 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0978-3
77. Lawn BR, Pajares A, Zhang Y, et al. Materials design in the performance of all-ceramic crowns. Biomaterials. 2004; 25: 2885–2892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.050
78. D’Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini M, et al. In vitro fracture resistance and deflection of pulpless teeth restored with fiber posts and prepared for veneers. J Endod. 2008; 34: 838–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.026
79. Nayyar A, Walton R, and Leonard L. An amal-gam coronal-radicular dowel and core tech-nique for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1980; 43: 511–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90322-4
80. Sorrentino R, Salameh Z, Zarone F, et al. Effect of post-retained composite restoration of MOD preparations on the fracture resistance of endodon-tically treated teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 49–56.
Article Sidebar
Published
Dec 09, 2022
Article Details
How to Cite
Yahya K. Assiri, A., Saafi, J., M. Al Moaleem, M., & Mehta, V. (2022). Ferrule effect and its importance in restorative dentistry: A literature Review. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 29(04), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.47750/jptcp.2022.977
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Yahya K. Assiri, A., Saafi, J., M. Al Moaleem, M., & Mehta, V. (2022). Ferrule effect and its importance in restorative dentistry: A literature Review. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 29(04), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.47750/jptcp.2022.977