ADVERSE DRUG REACTION PROFILE OF ANTI-SNAKE VENOM IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Keywords
Snakebite, Anti-Snake Venom, Adverse Drug Reactions, Tertiary Care, Envenomation, Vascular Toxic Snakebite
Abstract
Snake envenomation is a major public health issue, particularly in tropical regions like India, where an estimated 250,000 snake bite cases occur annually. The administration of anti-snake venom (ASV) is the primary treatment modality; however, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with ASV pose a significant clinical challenge. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the incidence, severity, and clinical outcomes of ASV-related ADRs in patients treated at a tertiary care hospital. A total of 150 cases from June 2022 to May 2024 were analyzed, documenting demographic distribution, reaction profiles, severity classifications, and management strategies. Results: Among 150 patients, vascular toxic snakebites were the most common. The 21–30 years age group was predominantly affected, with a male preponderance. ASV-related adverse reactions occurred in 60% (n=90) of cases, with itching (56.7%) being the most frequently reported symptom. Other reactions included chills and rigor (30%), nausea and vomiting (12.2%), and severe respiratory distress (1.1%) requiring intubation. The 20-minute Whole Blood Clotting Test (WBCT) was abnormal in 43.3% of patients. Intradermal ASV sensitivity testing was performed in 54.7% of cases. The majority of patients experienced mild envenomation, with an average hospital stay of 3 days. Recovery was achieved in 81.3%, while 18.7% were referred to higher centers. Conclusion: This study highlights the high incidence of ASV-related adverse reactions, emphasizing the need for careful monitoring and pre-medication strategies to mitigate risks.
References
2. Alirol E, Sharma SK, Bawaskar HS, Kuch U, Chappuis F. Snake bite in South Asia: a review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(1):e603.
3. WHO Guidelines for the production, control, and regulation of snake antivenom immunoglobulins. World Health Organization; 2010.
4. Warrell DA, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, et al. Severe neurotoxic envenoming by the Malayan krait (Bungarus candidus). Q J Med. 1983;52(208):719-733.
5. Alam M, Ghosh A, Chakraborty S, et al. Anaphylaxis following anti-snake venom administration: a retrospective study. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018;22(9):621-625.
6. Das RR, Sankar J, Dev N. Immediate hypersensitivity reaction following anti-snake venom therapy in children with snake envenomation: a systematic review. Trop Doct. 2017;47(1):32-38.
7. Chippaux JP. Snakebite envenomation turns again into a neglected tropical disease! J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2017;23:38.
8. Gutiérrez JM, Burnouf T, Harrison RA, Calvete JJ, Kuch U, Warrell DA. A multicomponent strategy to improve the availability of antivenom for treating snakebite envenoming. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92(7):526-532.
9. Patra A, Kumar R, Meena DS, et al. Predictors of acute kidney injury in patients with snakebite envenomation: a single-center observational study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(3):1511-1516.
10. Mohapatra B, Warrell DA, Suraweera W, et al. Snakebite mortality in India: a nationally representative mortality survey. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(4):e1018.
11. Laustsen AH, Solà M, Jappe EC, Oscoz S, Lauridsen LP, Engmark M. Biotechnological trends in spider and snake antivenom development. Toxins (Basel). 2016;8(8):226.
12. Wrrell DA. WHO/SEARO Guidelines for the clinical management of snake bites. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999;30(Suppl 1):1-85.
13. Deshpande RP, Motghare VM, Padwal SL, et al. Adverse drug reaction profile of anti-snake venom in a rural tertiary care hospital. J Young Pharm. 2013;5(2):41-5.
14. Sriapha C, Rittilert P, Vasaruchapong T, et al. Early Adverse Reactions to Snake Antivenom: Poison Center Data Analysis. Toxins (Basel). 2022;14(10):694.
15. Menon JC, Joseph JK, Jose MP, et al. Clinical Profile and Laboratory Parameters in 1051 Victims of Snakebite from a Single Centre in Kerala, South India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2016;64(8):22-29.
16. Gómez-Betancur I, Gogineni V, Salazar-Ospina A, León F. Perspective on the Therapeutics of Anti-Snake Venom. Molecules. 2019;24(18):3276.
17. Pore SM, Ramanand SJ, Patil PT, et al. A retrospective study of use of polyvalent anti-snake venom and risk factors for mortality from snake bite in a tertiary care setting. Indian J Pharmacol. 2015;47(3):270-4.
18. Gutiérrez JM, Burnouf T, Harrison RA, et al. A multicomponent strategy to improve the availability of antivenom. Toxicon. 2014;60(4):50-63.
19. Ahmed SM, Ahmed M, Nadeem A, et al. Emergency treatment of a snake bite: Pearls from literature. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2008;1(2):97-105.
20. Rojnuckarin P, Incharoen P, Srisuma S, et al. The efficacy and safety of antivenom therapy in Russell's viper envenomation: A randomized controlled trial. Toxicon. 2010;55(4):673-9.
21. Sharma SK, Chappuis F, Jha N, et al. Impact of snake bites and determinants of fatal outcomes in southeastern Nepal. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71(2):234-8.
22. Krishnamurthy P, Gowda VK, Venkatesh V, et al. Clinical profile and outcome of neurotoxic snake envenomation in children. Indian Pediatr. 2017;54(8):626-9.
23. Silva A, Hodgson WC, Isbister GK. Antivenom for neuromuscular effects of snake envenoming: A systematic review. Toxins. 2017;9(5):143.
24. Vongphoumy I, Phimmasone K, Nouanthong P, et al. Snakebites in Lao PDR: A retrospective analysis from a national hospital of 1977-2017 cases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(5):e0009422.
25. Patikorn C, Wilde H, Gutiérrez JM, et al. Antivenom availability and affordability: Science versus market forces. Toxins. 2020;12(5):296.
26. Harrison RA, Gutiérrez JM, White J, et al. Snake envenoming: A disease of poverty. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(12):e569.
27. Ariaratnam CA, Sjöström L, Raziek Z, et al. An open, randomized comparative trial of two antivenoms for the treatment of envenoming by Russell's viper. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95(1):74-80.
28. David AW, Christopher PK, Wüster W. The burden of snakebite in India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(4):e1018.
29. Fry BG, Wüster W, Kini RM, et al. Venomous snakes: Envenoming, therapy, and evolutionary trends. Toxicon. 2003;41(3):541-50.
30. Mohapatra B, Warrell DA, Suraweera W, et al. Snakebite mortality in India: A nationally representative mortality survey. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(4):e1018.
31. Chippaux JP. Snake-bites: Appraisal of the global situation. Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76(5):515-24.