COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PONSETI METHOD VERSUS FRENCH FUNCTIONAL METHOD IN THE TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC CLUBFOOT
Main Article Content
Keywords
Idiopathic clubfoot, Ponseti method, French functional method, clubfoot treatment, non-surgical correction, Pirani score.
Abstract
Background
Idiopathic clubfoot is a common congenital deformity affecting the musculoskeletal system. The Ponseti method and the French functional method are two widely used non-surgical approaches for its management. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of these two techniques in terms of treatment success, recurrence rate, and functional outcomes.
Materials and Methods
A prospective comparative study was conducted on 60 infants (90 feet) diagnosed with idiopathic clubfoot. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the Ponseti method group (n=30, 45 feet) and the French functional method group (n=30, 45 feet). The Ponseti technique involved serial manipulations, casting, Achilles tenotomy (if required), and bracing. The French method included daily physical therapy, stretching, taping, and splinting for the first three months, followed by a gradual transition to night splinting. Treatment outcomes were assessed at six months and one year using the Pirani score, Dimeglio classification, and the rate of recurrence requiring additional intervention.
Results
At the one-year follow-up, the Ponseti method demonstrated a significantly lower mean Pirani score (0.5 ± 0.2) compared to the French method (1.2 ± 0.3) (p<0.05). Successful correction was achieved in 90% of cases using the Ponseti method versus 75% in the French method. The recurrence rate was higher in the French method group (20%) than in the Ponseti group (8%). The need for additional surgical intervention was also more frequent in the French group (15%) compared to the Ponseti group (5%).
Conclusion
Both methods are effective for managing idiopathic clubfoot, but the Ponseti method showed superior outcomes in terms of correction, recurrence rate, and need for surgical intervention. Given its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and higher success rate, the Ponseti technique should be preferred for primary treatment.
References
2. Steinman S, Richards BS, Faulks S, Kaipus K. A comparison of two nonoperative methods of idiopathic clubfoot correction: the Ponseti method and the French functional (physiotherapy) method. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct 1;91 Suppl 2:299-312.
3. Haft GF, Walker CG, Crawford HA. Early clubfoot recurrence after use of the Ponseti method in a New Zealand population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Mar;89(3):487-93.
4. Al-Hilli AB. Ponseti method in the treatment of post-operative relapsed idiopathic clubfoot after posteromedial release. A short term functional study. Foot (Edinb). 2020 Dec;45:101721.
5. de La Taille E, Sales de Gauzy J, Gaubert Noirot M. Idiopathic clubfoot treatment and heterogeneity of current therapeutic strategies: The Ponseti method versus the French functional method (a systematic review). Arch Pediatr. 2021 Jul;28(5):422-428.
6. Dobbs MB, Gurnett CA. Update on clubfoot: etiology and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 May;467(5):1146-53.
7. Zhao D, Liu J, Zhao L, Wu Z, Peng F. Comparative study on Ponseti method and traditional orthopedic treatment for congenital clubfoot. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011;25(7):791-4.
8. Dimeglio A, Bonnet F, Mazeau P, De Rosa V. Orthopaedic treatment of congenital clubfoot: physiotherapy or surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(2):374-6.
9. Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(10):1477-89.
10. Goksan SB, Bursali A, Bilgili F, Sivacioglu S, Aksu M. Ponseti technique for the correction of idiopathic clubfeet presenting up to 1 year of age: is the outcome age dependent? J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006;15(2):409-13.
11. Avilucea FR, Szalay EA. Clubfoot recurrence rates between different treatment protocols. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29(7):700-4.
12. Janicki JA, Wright JG, Weir S, Narayanan UG. A comparison of outcome measures used in the evaluation of idiopathic clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(4):1171-8.
13. Churchill D, Dobbs MB, Schoenecker PL. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17(10):618-25.
14. Gottschalk HP, Karol LA, Jeans KA. Gait analysis of children treated for moderate clubfoot with physical therapy versus the Ponseti cast technique. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Apr-May;30(3):235-9.
15. Rastogi A, Agarwal A. Long-term outcomes of the Ponseti method for treatment of clubfoot: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2021 Oct;45(10):2599-2608.