ANATOMICAL ASSESSMENT OF MAXILLARY FIRST BICUSPID ROOT CANAL MORPHOLOGY USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Main Article Content

Dr. Rozi Afsar
Dr. Farhan Dil
Dr. Aleena Amin
Dr. Arbab Zia-ur-Rehman
Dr. Muahammad Aamir Sardar
Dr. Hassan Jan
Dr. Arbab Shahkar Hamid

Keywords

Canals, roots, Bicuspid, morphology, maxilla, cone beam computed tomography

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to assess Maxillary First Bicuspid Root Canal Morphology ‘using Cone Beam Computed Tomography’


Methodology: This was ‘Descriptive study’ and was carried out in the Radiology department at Rehman College of Dentistry in Peshawar from September 15, 2022 to March 15, 2023. The ‘CBCT scans of 120 patients from both sexes aged between 18 to 60 years were analyzed’. The Cone Beam Computed Tomography scan was evaluated for the configuration and number of pulp canals. Their results were analyzed through SPSS (v. 21). A chi square test was performed to see the effect modifiers of canal number stratified by gender. Significance was set at a p-value of 0.05.


Results: Among the ‘120 Cone Beam Computed Tomography scans (N=120), 69 (57.5%) were females and 51 (42.5%) were males with the mean age of 32.02, the ages ranged from 18-55 years and the standard deviation was 13.45 years’. ‘Most of the maxillary first bicuspids had a 2 canal (n=73, 60.83%) followed by 3 canals (n=27, 22.50%)’. C shaped canals (n=11, 9.16%) and single canal teeth (n=2, 1.68%) were rare. The number of canals in genders was not statistically significant.


Conclusion: The most common type of maxillary first bicuspids has two canals followed by three canals. Prevalence of teeth with c shaped canals and single canal teeth is rare.

Abstract 177 | PDF Downloads 83

References

1. Maghfuri S, Keylani H, Chohan H, Dakkam S, Atiah A, Mashyakhy M. Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary first bicuspids by cone beam computed tomography in Saudi Arabian southern region in subpopulation: An in vitro study. Int J Denti 2019;19:25-31.
2. Al-Zubaidi SM, Almansour MI, Al Mansour NN, Alshammari AS, Alshammari AF, Altamimi YS, et al. Assessment of Root Morphology and Canal Configuration of Maxillary Bicuspids in a Saudi Subpopulation: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Study. BMC Oral Health 2021;21(1):1-11.
3. Lo Giudice R, Nicita F, Puleio F, Alibrandi A, Cervino G, Lizio A, et al. Accuracy of periapical radiography and CBCT in endodontic evaluation. Int J Denti 2018;2018:45-50.
4. Hussain SM, Khan HH, Bhangar F, Alam M, Yousaf A, Ibrahim A. Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary first bicuspid in armed forces institute of dentistry Rawalpindi. Pak Arm Force Med J 2020;70(2):605-09
5. Dhillon JK, Ghosh S, Mathur VP. Root canal morphology of primary molars–A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2022;33(1):14-6.
6. Parupalli K, Solomon RV, Karteek BS, Polasa S. Application of cone-beam computed tomography in the analysis and management of intricate internal anatomy of hyper-and mesotaurodontic teeth. JCD. 2020;23(2):211-6
7. Lin Y, Xiang Y, Chen X, Wang H, Cao N, Xu X et al. Z. Multiple root canals in the maxillary molar: an unusual case report. BMC oral health. 2021;21(1):1-6.
8. Kavas AA, Tümen EC. Volumetric pulp chambers measurements in mandibular and maxillary permanent first molar using cone-beam computed tomography by age and gender. International Dental Research. 2019;9(1):30-40.
9. Park JH, Kim Y, Park JH, Lee NK, Kim SH, Kook YA. Long-term evaluation of maxillary molar position after distalization using modified C-palatal plates in patients with and without first molar eruption. A J O D O. 2021;160(6):853-61.
10. Pan F, Yang Z, Wang J, Cai R, Liu J, Zhang C, Liao W. Influence of orthodontic treatment with bicuspid extraction on the spatial position of maxillary third molars in adult patients: a retrospective cohort cone-bean computed tomography study. BMC Ora Heal. 2020;20:1-8.
11. Lee YJ, Kook YA, Park JH, Park J, Bayome M, Vaid NR, Kim Y. Short-term cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of maxillary third molar changes after total arch distalization in adolescents.A JO D O. 2019;155(2):191-7.
12. Lupoi D, Dragomir M, Coada G, Sanda A, Budu V. CT scan evaluation of the distance between maxillary sinus floor and maxillary teeth apices. Roman J Rhino. 2021;1(41):18-23.
13. Qiao X, Xu T, Chen L, Yang D. Analysis of root canal curvature and root canal morphology of maxillary posterior teeth in Guizhou, China. Medical Science Monitor: I M J E C R. 2021;27:758-61.
14. Mirza MB, Gufran K, Alhabib O, Alafraa O, Alzahrani F, Abuelqomsan MS et al. CBCT based study to analyze and classify root canal morphology of maxillary molars-A retrospective study. E R M P S. 2022;26(18):367-9.
15. Yan Y, Li J, Zhu H, Liu J, Ren J, Zou L. CBCT evaluation of root canal morphology and anatomical relationship of root of maxillary first bicuspid to maxillary sinus in a western Chinese population. BMC Ora Heal. 2021;21(1):1-9.
16. Dil F, Nasir U, Maryam B, Afsar R. ROOT CANAL MORPHOLOGY IN MAXILLARY FIRST BICUSPID USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CBCT) IN PATIENTS BELONGS TO PESHAWAR KHYBER PAKHUNKHWA. J K C D. 2022;12(2):56-9.
17. Regnstrand T, Torres A, Petitjean E, Lambrechts P, Benchimol D, Jacobs R. CBCT‐based assessment of the anatomic relationship between maxillary sinus and upper teeth. C E D R. 2021;7(6):1197-204.
18. Maia LM, de Carvalho Machado V, da Silva NR, Júnior MB, da Silveira RR, Júnior GM, Sobrinho AP. Case reports in maxillary posterior teeth by guided endodontic access. J Endod. 2019;45(2):214-8.
19. Motiwala M, Arif A, Ghafoor R. A CBCT based evaluation of root proximity of maxillary posterior teeth to sinus floor in a subset of Pakistani population. JPMA. 2021;71(8):1992-3
20. Wolf TG, Kozaczek C, Campus G, Paqué F, Wierichs RJ. Root Canal Morphology of 116 Maxillary First Bicuspids by Micro–Computed Tomography in a Mixed Swiss-German Population with Systematic Review. J Endod. 2020;46(11):1639-47.
21. Olczak K, Pawlicka H, Szymański W. Root and canal morphology of the maxillary first bicuspids as indicated by cone beam computed tomography. Austral Endod J. 2023;49(1):92-103.

Most read articles by the same author(s)