EFFECTIVENESS OF EARLY ORTHODONTIC INTERVENTION FOR CLASS II AND CLASS III MALOCCLUSIONS IN ADOLESCENTS: A META-ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES, OVERJET REDUCTION, AND LONG-TERM STABILITY.

Main Article Content

Mohammad Momin Khan
Shanzay Wazir
Amna Bint e Rashid
Muhammad afeef ali
Hava inam
Shehrezad Jamshed
Rida Malik
Marwa Elahi
Zainab Mahmood

Keywords

Early orthodontic intervention, malocclusion, incisal trauma, overjet reduction, long-term stability.

Abstract

Background: Malocclusion, a misalignment of teeth and jaws, is a common dental issue that affects both the function and esthetics of the mouth. If untreated, it can lead to complications like trauma, periodontal disease, and temporomandibular joint disorders. This study evaluates the effectiveness of early orthodontic intervention in preventing malocclusion by analyzing clinical outcomes, treatment timing, and long-term stability in adolescents.


 


Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Scopus was conducted from 2005 to 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews evaluating early orthodontic treatments. The analysis included children and adolescents aged 6-14 years who received early orthodontic treatment. Studies were compared against late treatments or no interventions. Data from these studies were synthesized using Hedges’ g for effect size and I² for heterogeneity, with publication bias assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test.


 


Results: Nine studies involving 166 to 800 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Early intervention significantly reduced the incidence of incisal trauma, with trauma rates in early treatment groups ranging from 19% to 20% compared to 29% to 30% in late treatment groups. Overjet reduction averaged 7.0 mm in early treatment groups, compared to 4.8 mm in late treatment groups. Class II correction success was 82% with early treatment, compared to 65% with late treatment. Skeletal stability, particularly in mandibular growth, showed significant improvement. The long-term stability of results ranged from 75% to 90% over 2-7 years, with fixed retainers providing better stability than removable retainers.


 


Conclusions: Early orthodontic intervention offers significant benefits in reducing trauma, improving skeletal alignment, and ensuring better long-term stability in adolescents with malocclusion. The findings suggest that early intervention should be prioritized, particularly for high-risk patients, to avoid more invasive treatments in the future. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to refine treatment protocols and establish long-term retention strategies.

Abstract 506 | pdf Downloads 137

References

1. De Toffol, L., Pavoni, C., Baccetti, T., Franchi, L., & Cozza, P. (2007). Orthopedic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion. The Angle Orthodontist, 78(3), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.2319/030207-108.1
2. Baccetti, T., Franchi, L., Toth, L. R., & McNamara, J. A. (2000). Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 118(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2000.105571
3. Laffer, J. (2001). Early treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 119(4), 19A. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.114375
4. O’Brien, K., Wright, J., Conboy, F., Appelbe, P., Davies, L., Connolly, I., Mitchell, L., Littlewood, S., Mandall, N., Lewis, D., Sandler, J., Hammond, M., Chadwick, S., O’Neill, J., McDade, C., Oskouei, M., Thiruvenkatachari, B., Read, M., Robinson, S., . . . Worthington, H. (2009b). Early treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: A multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 135(5), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.042
5. Contemporary Orthodontics. (n.d.). Elsevier Shop. https://shop.elsevier.com/books/contemporary-orthodontics/proffit/978-0-323-54387-3
6. Tulloch, J., Proffit, W. R., & Phillips, C. (2004). Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early class II treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 125(6), 657–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.008
7. Batista, K. B., Thiruvenkatachari, B., Harrison, J. E., & O’Brien, K. D. (2018). Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents. Cochrane Library, 2018(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003452.pub4
8. Kalha, A. S. (2014). Early orthodontic treatment reduced incisal trauma in children with class II malocclusions. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 15(1), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400986
9. Brierley, C., DiBiase, A., & Sandler, P. (2017). Early Class II treatment. Australian Dental Journal, 62(S1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12478
10. DiBiase, A. T., Seehra, J., Papageorgiou, S. N., & Cobourne, M. T. (2022). Do we get better outcomes from early treatment of Class III discrepancies? BDJ, 233(3), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4507-0
11. Zhou, C., Duan, P., He, H., Song, J., Hu, M., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Guo, J., Jin, F., Cao, Y., Jiang, L., Ye, Q., Zhu, M., Jiang, B., Ruan, W., Yuan, X., Li, H., Zou, R., Tian, Y., . . . Li, X. (2024). Expert consensus on pediatric orthodontic therapies of malocclusions in children. International Journal of Oral Science, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-024-00299-8
12. Musich, D. R., & Busch, M. J. (2007). Early orthodontic treatment: current clinical perspectives. Alpha Omegan, 100(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aodf.2006.07.003
13. Veitz-Keenan, A., & Liu, N. (2019). One phase or two phases orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion? Evidence-Based Dentistry, 20(2), 56–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-019-0035-4
14. Ghafari, J., King, G. J., & Tulloch, J. C. (1998). Early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion — Comparison of alternative treatment modalities. Clinical Orthodontics and Research, 1(2), 107–117.https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.1998.1.2.107
15. O’Brien, K., Wright, J., Conboy, F., Appelbe, P., Davies, L., Connolly, I., Mitchell, L., Littlewood, S., Mandall, N., Lewis, D., Sandler, J., Hammond, M., Chadwick, S., O’Neill, J., McDade, C., Oskouei, M., Thiruvenkatachari, B., Read, M., Robinson, S., . . . Worthington, H. (2009). Early treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: A multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 135(5), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.042