STUDY ON PRESENCE OF ABNORMAL VAGINAL DISCHARGE IN PREGNANT WOMEN AND ITS OUTCOME: PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Main Article Content

Manohar Ganapathi Revankar
Vijaya Manohar Revankar
Shreenivas Revankar
Niveditha Manjunath
Ananya M Revankar

Keywords

Candidiasis, trichomoniasis, psychological, pregnancy, antenatal

Abstract

Vaginal discharge (VD) is a common symptom in women during the reproductive period, especially during pregnancy. Pathological VD during pregnancy is an important public health concern because it has a socio-psychological impact on women and influences feto-maternal outcomes. The study aims to estimate the prevalence of abnormal vaginal discharge in pregnant women, also focuses on the demographic profile and various risk factors associated with pathological VDs and their consequences on fetal and maternal health. A prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in a tertiary care center in Mangalore. A total of 250 pregnant women with complaints of VD in the second and third trimesters with confirmation on speculum examination were recruited and evaluated for the etiology of discharge. Patients were followed until delivery and data regarding feto-maternal outcomes was collected. The prevalence of pathological VD among enrolled women was 39.33% and various etiologies were candidiasis (15.33%), bacterial vaginosis (10.66%), aerobic vaginitis (8.67%), and trichomoniasis (4.67%). These infections were significantly related to pre-term delivery and pre-term pre-labor rupture of membranes. Furthermore, the incidence of prematurity, and low birth weight neonates requiring neonatal intensive care unit care was significantly high in babies born to mothers with pathological VD. Vaginal infections affect both maternal and neonatal health, thus, increasing the likelihood of poor perinatal outcomes. Hence, we propose that routine screening for pathological VD for all pregnant women should be introduced into standard antenatal care.

Abstract 218 | pdf Downloads 107

References

1. Huggins GR, Prete G, Vaginal odours and secretions, clinic in obs and gyn, 1981:24:355-377:14022
2. Levision ME, et al. Quantitative microflora of the vagina Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1977;127;80.
3. Laison b et al, vaginal microbial flora. composition and influences of lost physiology Ann Int med 1982;96;926.
4. Brown WJ et al, variations of bacterial flora, Ann Int med 1982;96;131
5. Shafer MA et al Microbiology of lower genital tract of post menarchal adolescent girls J Paed 1985;107;974.
6. Text Book of microbiology anant Narayan.
7. Kamath P PaisM Nayak MG Risk of vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women Int J.Curr.microbial 2013;2(9);141-6
8. Amsels R,Totten pa, Spiegel CA, Chen KCS, Eschnbach DA, Holmes KK (1983) Nonspecific vaginitis: diagnostic criteria and epidemiologic associations. AM J Med 74
9. Nugent RPKrohn MA et al (1991) reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation J.Clinic microbolo29:297-301
10. Rathod Set al Int J Reprod Obstet Gynecol, 2016 jun 1823-26.
11. Walthne B, Holst E et al Vaginal discharge -Comparison of clinical laboratory and microbiological findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol.802-808.
12. Zeinab a et al vaginal infections among pregnant women and its antibiotic susceptibility of causative agents of vaginal infections 2014:8:490-497.
13. Raviraj et al Sch.J. App. Med. Sc., 2017;5(2A);336-338
14. In a study by MinkoffH et al, GrunebaumAN, Schwarz RH.et al(14)women of lower socioeconomic status had increased of BV. and risk factors for prematurity and PROM a prospective study of vaginal flora in pregnancy, American J Obstet Gynaecol, 2004;150
15. Leitich H, Kiss H (2007) Asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis and intermediate flora as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res ClinObstet Gynaecol 21:375-390.
16. Abdelaziz, Zeinab et al 2014 commonest organisms were Chlamydia trachomatis in his study,490-497;
17. Tania Maria et al 2013 incidence of urinary tract infection among pregnant women associated with vaginal infections vol.24,558-566.
18. V Patil, S. Pednekar, H. Weiss, and D. Mabey, "Risk factors for common mental disorders in women: population-based longitudinal study," British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 189.pp. 547-55,2006.
19. Paul S,Kannan, Prevalence of antenatal vulvovaginal candidiasis; Int Journal of Reprod 2017 Jan 31:443-446.
20. Giaraldo et al. Amaral RI, The prevalence of urogenital infections in pregnant women experiencing preterm and full-term labour, Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2012.