A STUDY ON EVALUATION OF LABORATORY DETECTION METHODS AND PREVALENCE RATE OF VANCOMYCIN HETERORESISTANCE IN CLINICAL ISOLATES OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Main Article Content

Dr. Sharmila R
Dr. Vanathi S
Dr. Malini P
Dr. Hemasuganya P

Keywords

Vancomycin heteroresistance, hVISA detection, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Screening methods, Modified Population Analysis Profile (PAP-AUC)

Abstract

Introduction: Heterogenous vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus hVISA is characterized by the presence of a resistant subpopulation, usually at a frequency of 1 in10 6, in an otherwise fully susceptible population. Increased cell wall thickness is a consistent feature of these isolates though screening of heteroresistance remains difficult, now It has become necessary for all clinical laboratories to establish and validate methods to detect h-VRSA. To detect vancomycin heteroresistant subpopulation of cells present in methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. This study aims to evaluate the screening methods in detection of vancomycin resistance among 100MRSA isolates and to find the prevalence rate of vancomycin heteroresistance among MRSA isolates.
Materials and Methods: A cross sectional study including 100 clinically significant methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus{MRSA} isolates, selected by detection of Methicillin resistance by cefoxitin disc diffusion method. The following menthods are compared for detection of hVISA. Vancomycin screen agar (BHIA6V), E test GRD, vancomycin broth microdilution, modified population analysis profile.
Results and Discussion: Among 100 isolates screened by vancomycin screen agar method heteroresistance was detected in 5 isolates out of which 3 were confirmed as hVISA by modified PAP-AUC method. By BMD 3 out of 100 isolates showed MIC4µg/ml that was identified as VISA .All these 3isolates were identified as hVISA by PAP-AUC method. E STRIP GRD shows 2/100 isolates are identified as VISA that is found to be heteroresistant strains. By Modified population analysis profile the PAP-AUC curve cut-off result was ≥ 0.9 for 3 isolates that were confirmed to be hVISA.
Conclusion: This study infers that the combined use of screen agar – BHIA with 6µg/ml and BMD values is effective combination approach to detect heteroresistant strains but modified PAP-AUC is the gold standard method till date to detect hVISA as it is the only reliable method to confirm the heterogeneity of vancomycin susceptibility. From this study the prevalence of hVISA was found to be 3% among MRSA isolates.

Abstract 134 | pdf Downloads 92

References

1. Anne Yusof; Evaluation of a New Etest Vancomycin-Teicoplanin Strip for Detection of Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (GISA), in Particular, Heterogeneous GISA; J Clin Micro biol. 2008 Sep; 46(9): 3042–3047.
2. K. Riederer, S. Shemes, P. Chase, A. Musta, A. Mar, and R. Khatib; Detection of Intermediately Vancomycin-Susceptible and Heterogeneous Staphylococcus aureus Isolates: Comparison of Etest and Agar Screening Methods; doi:10.1128/JCM.01435-10
3. Hayati Güneş1, Emel Sesli Çetin2, Selçuk Kaya2 and Buket Cicioğlu Arıdoğan2 ;Investigation of reduced glycopeptid susceptibility among methicillin resistant staphylococci; DOI: 10.5897/AJMR11.1445 .
4. Benjamin P. Howden,1,2,3,4* John K. Davies,3 Paul D. R. Johnson, Timothy P. Stinear,3,4* and M. Lindsay Grayson1,5,6;Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, Including Vancomycin-Intermediate and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Strains: Resistance Mechanisms, Laboratory Detection, and Clinical Implications; doi:10.1128/CMR .00042-09.
5. Adina C. Musta, Kathleen Riederer, Stephen Shemes, Patrick Chase, Jinson Jose; Vancomycin MIC plus Heteroresistance and Outcome of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Trends over 11 Years;doi:10.1128/JCM.02135-08.
6. RN Iyer, V Hittinahalli; modified pap method to detect heteroresistance to vancomycin among MRSA isolates at a tertiary care hospital; IJMM(2008) ,26(2):176-9.
7. CLSI GUIDELINES: M100-S38 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement
8. Catherine liu and henry; Staphylococcus aureus with heterogenous resistance to vancomycin, epidemology, clinical significance and critical assesment of diagnostic methods; antimicrob agents chemother.2003 oct;47(10):3040-3045.
9. Sebastian, michael; performance of various testing methodologies for detection of heteroresistant vancomycin intermediate sthaphylocoocus aureus in blood stream isolates; j clin microbiol.2011 apr;49(4):1489-1494.
10. Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marion BP, Simmons A, editors. Mackie and McCartney practical medical microbiology, 14thed.Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1996.
11. Leonard, S. N., K. L. Rossi, K. L. Newton, and M. J. Rybak. 2009. Evaluation of the Etest GRD for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 63:489–492
12. Walsh, T. R., et al. 2001. Evaluation of current methods for detection of staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. J. Clin. Microbiol.39:2439–2444.