CESAREAN SCAR PREGNANCY MANAGEMENT: KEY INSIGHTS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), placentra accreta disorder, Laparotomy with scar excision and repair, Suction and evacuation
Abstract
Introduction: Cesarean scar pregnancy is defined by the full or partial implantation of the gestational sac in the myometrium scar of the uterine incision from a previous cesarean section. The clinical presentation of a CSP is highly variable, with vaginal bleeding being the most common complaint, with or without abdominal pain. CSP can continue to a viable gestational age and can result in placentra accreta disorder.
Materials and Methods: This prospective study was done in department of obstetrics and gynecology SKIMS Soura Srinagar. In our study, we observed 16 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy over a period of 3 years from August 2021 to September 2024. All women attending our antenatal OPD or casualty with history of amenorrhoea, pain abdomen and bleeding per vagina with positive urine pregnancy test, history of previous LSCS and TVS documented caesarean scar pregnancy or intraoperative features suggestive of caesarean scar pregnancy were included in our study.
Results and Observations: A total of 16 cases were taken in our study over a period of 3 years. Maximum number of patients 8 (50%) were in the age group of 25-30 years. 37% of patients were 3rd gravida. Majority of patients 9 (56.2%) had history of previous two LSCS. Majority of patients (43.7%) had gestational age of 8-10 weeks. In our study we observed different treatment options for the same. Laparotomy with scar excision and repair was done in 31.2% of cases followed by laparoscopic scar excision and repair in 18.7%, Systemic MXT in 18.7%, USG guided dilation and evacuation in 12.5%, laparotomy and scar excision and IU tamponade, Suction and evacuation, Suction and evacuation + IU tamponade and Hysteroscopic removal in 6.25% of cases in each.
Conclusion: The first problem is the diagnosis, which is really difficult for clinicians working in the primary care centers. The second and the main problem is the treatment. Efforts should be made to educate clinicians and radiologists to identify features of scar pregnancies and refer them selectively to tertiary centers.
References
2. Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Yan-Sheng Lin M, Tsai Y-L, Hwang J-L. Caesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 247–253.
3. Jayaram P, Okunoye G, Al Ibrahim AA, Ghani R, Kalache K. Expectant management of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review. J Perinat Med 2018;46(4):365–72.
4. Kutlesic R, Kutlesic M, Vukomanovic P, Stefanovic M, Mostic-Stanisic D. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy successfully managed to term: when the patient is determined to keep the pregnancy. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(10).
5. Shah P, Manandhar R, Thapa M, Saha R. Ruptured cesarean scar pregnancy: A case report. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2019;57(217):209–12.
6. Fu L, Luo Y, Huang J. Cesarean scar pregnancy with expectant management. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2022;48(7):1683–90.
7. Morente LS, Leon ´ AIG, Reina MPE, Herrero JRA, Mesa EG, Lopez ´ JSJ. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy-case series: Treatment decision algorithm and success with medical treatment. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57(4).
8. Riaz RM, Williams TR, Craig BM, Myers DT. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: imaging features, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40(7): 2589–99.
9. Panaitescu AM, Ciobanu AM, Gica N, Peltecu G, Botezatu R. Diagnosis and management of cesarean scar pregnancy and placenta accreta spectrum: case series and review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med 2021;40(9):1975–86.
10. Maheux-Lacroix S, Li F, Bujold E, Nesbitt-Hawes E, Deans R, Abbott J. Cesarean scar pregnancies: A systematic review of treatment options. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24(6): 915–25.
11. Miller R, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #63: Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227(3):B9–b20.
12. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Calì G, D’Antonio F, Kaelin AA. Cesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis and pathogenesis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2019;46(4): 797–811.
13. Litwicka K, Greco E. Caesarean scar pregnancy: A review of management options. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013;25:456 61.
14. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Bennett TA, et al. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207(1): 44.e1–44.13, doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.018, indexed in Pubmed: 22607667.
15. Shi M, Zhang H, Qi SS, et al. Identifying risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective study of 79 cases. Ginekol Pol. 2018; 89(4): 195–199.
16. Zosmer N, Fuller J, Shaikh H, Johns J, Ross JA. Natural history of early first trimester pregnancies implanted in Cesarean scars. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:367 75.
17. Noel L, Thilaganathan B. Caesarean scar pregnancy: Diagnosis, natural history and treatment. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2022;34:279 86.
18. Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Budny Winska J, Zimmer A, Zimmer M. Natural history of caesarean scar pregnancy. Ginekol Pol 2019;90:351 2.
19. Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, et al. Ectopic pregnancies in a caesarean scar: review of the medical approach to an iatrogenic complication. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 10: 515–523.
20. Gonzalez N, Tulandi T. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(5):731–8.
21. Hameed MS, Wright A, Chern BS. Cesarean scar pregnancy: Current understanding and treatment including role of minimally invasive surgical techniques. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2023;12:64-71.
22. Hong SC, Lau MS, Yam PK. Ectopic pregnancy in previous caesarean section scar. Singapore Med J 2011; 52: e115–e117.
23. Kutuk MS, Uysal G, Dolanbay M, Ozgun MT. Successful medical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies with systemic multi-dose methotrexate: single-center experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40: 1700–1706.
24. El-Guindi W, Alalfy M, Abasy A, Ellithy A, Nabil A, Abdalfatah O et al. A report of four cases of caesarean scar pregnancy in a period of 24 months. J Med Diagn Meth 2013; 2: 2.
25. I. E. Timor-Tritsch and A.Monteagudo. Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2012; 207(1): 14–29.
26. Deans R, Abbot J. Hysteroscopic management of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Fertile Steril 2010; 93: 1735–1740.
27. Chao A, Wang TH, Wang CJ, et al. Hysteroscopic management of caesarean scar pregnancy after unsuccessful methotrexate treatment. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005; 12: 374–376.
28. Robinson J, Dayal M, Gindoff P, Frankfurter D. A novel surgical treatment for caesarean scar pregnancy: laparoscopically assisted operative hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1497.e13–1497.e16.
29. Fuchs N, Manoucheri E, Verbaan M, Einarsson JI. Laparoscopic management of extrauterine pregnancy in caesarean section scar: description of a surgical technique and review of the literature. BJOG 2015; 122: 137–140.
30. Lin EP, Bhatt S, Dogra VS. Diagnostic clues to ectopic pregnancy. Radiographics 2008; 28: 1661–71.
31. Valley MT, Pierce JG, Daniel TB, Kaunitz AM. Cesarean scar pregnancy: imaging and treatment with a conservative surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 838–40.
32. Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Lin MY, Tsai YL, Hwang JL. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23: 247–53.
33. Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG. 2007; 114: 253–63.