COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LINEAR MEASUREMENTS BETWEEN IMPACTED AND ERUPTED MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLARS USING DIGITAL PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Linear Measurements, Impacted, Erupted, Mandibular Third Molars, Radiographs
Abstract
Background: Despite the widespread use of panoramic radiographs for assessing third molars, there remains a need for a more thorough understanding of the precise linear measurements associated with impacted versus erupted mandibular third molars. Linear measurements provide objective, quantifiable data that can help differentiate between impacted and erupted third molars. These measurements may include the angular position of the tooth, the root length, the proximity to critical structures like the inferior alveolar nerve, and the distance to adjacent teeth or bone. Comparing these linear measurements between impacted and erupted third molars can help identify subtle anatomical differences that may not be apparent through clinical examination alone. Material & Methods: All participants were exposed to digital panoramic radiograph with SIRONA ORTHOPHOS XG using exposing parameters of 68kvp, 11m PmA, and 18 second/Carestream 8000C. Out of these participants 520 mandibular third molar teeth were assessed and were divided into two following 2 groups : Group A consisted of 260 erupted mandibular third molar teeth and Group B consisted of 260 impacted mandibular third molar teeth. Pattern of impaction of mandibular third molar teeth was categorized according to Winter’s Classification into vertical, mesioangular, horizontal, distoangular, and others. Results: There is a significant difference in the mesiodistal width between impacted and erupted mandibular third molars. The impacted molars have a slightly larger MDW on average compared to erupted molars, with the difference being statistically significant. A significant difference is observed in the lower eruption space (LES-R) between impacted and erupted molars. Erupted molars have a larger average LES-R compared to impacted molars, indicating that less space is available in the impacted group, contributing to their impaction. Impact of Findings: The results indicate that erupted mandibular third molars generally have larger space measurements and higher space width ratios compared to impacted molars. These differences are statistically significant and suggest that space availability is a crucial factor in the eruption of mandibular third molars. Conclusion: The findings suggest that specific linear measurements, such as the distance between the impacted third molar and the second molar, can serve as predictive indicators for impaction and potential complications. Understanding these measurements allows for more accurate early diagnosis and better preoperative planning, improving patient outcomes.
References
2. Ravi, M., et al. (2021). "The diagnostic utility of panoramic radiography in the assessment of third molar impaction." Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, 9(3), 175-183.
3. Al-Richani, S., et al. (2020). "Patterns of mandibular third molar impaction: A radiographic study." Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 12(7), e625–e630.
4. Kambalimath, H., et al. (2019). "Classification of impacted mandibular third molars: A review of the literature and its clinical significance." Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 9(4), 402-406.
5. Coccia, D., et al. (2022). "Evaluation of the depth and angle of impaction in mandibular third molars using digital panoramic radiography." Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 133(1), 51-58.
6. Wehrbein, H., et al. (2021). "Third molar impaction and its associated pathological changes: A radiographic study." European Journal of Orthodontics, 43(3), 312-318.
7. Tavitian, E. A., et al. (2018). "Panoramic radiography in dentistry: A practical review." Journal of the American Dental Association, 149(6), 507-514.
8. Morris, M. E., et al. (2014). "The effects of radiographic distortion on tooth size and shape measurements in panoramic radiography." Dental Materials, 30(7), 684-690.
9. Hatcher, D., & Stepovich, M. (1999). "Panoramic radiology and its applications in dentistry." Radiologic Clinics of North America, 37(1), 17-28.
10. Sekerci, A. E., et al. (2010). "The use of cone-beam CT in the assessment of third molar impactions." Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 110(2), e39-e47.
11. Kirkwood, B. R., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2003). Essential Medical Statistics (2nd ed.). Blackwell Science.
12. Panyasantisuk, N., et al. (2016). "The prevalence and characteristics of impacted third molars in Thai population." Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 74(7), 1401-1408.
13. Mickelson, D., et al. (2016). "Observer variability in the measurement of dental radiographs." Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 121(3), 276-282.
14. Pati, S., et al. (2018). "Classification of impacted third molars: a critical review of current systems." International Journal of Dentistry, 2018, 2050856.
15. Mejia, P. M., et al. (2011). "Eruption of third molars in a selected population in the United States." Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 69(12), 3072-3076.
16. Choi, H. S., et al. (2017). "Impact of impaction angle on inferior alveolar nerve injury in mandibular third molar extraction." Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 75(2), 278-283.
17. Bortoluzzi, M. C., et al. (2017). "Influence of 3D imaging on the diagnosis and management of impacted mandibular third molars." Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 46(8), 20170253.
18. Nagaraj T, Balraj L, Irugu K, RajashekarmurthyS, Sreelakshmi. Radiographic assessment of distribution of mandibular third molar impaction: A retrospective study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2016;28:145 9.
19. Upadhyaya C, Chaurasia NK, Neupane I, Srivastava S. Incidence and Pattern of Impaction of Mandibular Third Molar: A Single Institutional Experience in Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2017;57(1):66-9.
20. Shahbaz S, Khan MDM. Evaluation of mandibular third molar impaction distribution on OPG: A digital radiographic study. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2017;3(4):393-396.
21. Prajapati VK, Mitra R, Vinayak KM. Pattern of mandibular third molar impaction and its association to caries in mandibular second molar:A clinical variant. Dent Res J 2017;14:137 42.
22. Verma A, Sharma P, Bhatnagar S. Evaluation and prediction of impacted mandibular third molars by panoramic radiography: A retrospective study. Int J Orthod Rehabil 2017;8:101 7.
23. Mohan S, Prajapati VK, Shahi A. Prevalence of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars in an East Indian Subpopulation: A Retrospective Radiographic Study. International Journal of Advanced & Integrated Medical Sciences. October-December 2017;2(4):175-177
24. Bhat M, Hamid R, Mir A. Prevalence of impacted teeth in adult patients: A radiographic study. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2019;5(1):10-12.
25. Ishwarkumar S, Pillay P, Haffajee MR, Satyapal KS. Prevalence of impacted third molars in the South African Indian population of the eThekwini Metropolitan Region. SADJ. 2019 Jul;74(6):302-309.
26. Shajahan S, Padiyath S, Thomas AE. Prevalence and Pattern of Distribution of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars on Digital Panoramic Radiograph among Central Kerala Population: A Cross Sectional Study. JMSCR. August 2019;7(8):242-247.
27. Asha V, Shrestha S. Assessment of early prediction of mandibular third molar impaction by panoramic indices: A radiological study Orthodontic Journal of Nepal. July-December 2020;10(3):45-48.
28. Alsaegh MA, Abushweme DA, Ahmed KO, Ahmed SO. The pattern of mandibular third molar impaction and its relationship with the development of distal caries in adjacent second molars among Emiratis: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jul 24;22(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02338-4.