COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK, PECTORAL NERVE BLOCK AND THORACIC EPIDURAL FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER MASTECTOMY SURGERY RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Erector Spinae Plane Block (ES), Pectoral Nerve Block (PECSII), Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TE), Mastectomy.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer operation is one of the most prevalent surgical procedures for females, with approximately 50% of cases having persistent pain (Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome) postoperatively, with twenty-four percent of these cases reporting their pain as moderate to severe. Evidence-based recommendations for the use of multimodal analgesia to treat postoperative pain were approved by the American Society of Anesthesiologists
Objective: Compare analgesic effectiveness of US guided PECSII with ESP block & TE for post operative analgesia.
Patients & Methods: This randomized comparative prospective clinical trial was conducted at Al-Zahraa University Hospital, Cairo, and Sharq Elmadina Hospital, Alexandria. 105 females between the ages of 40 and 60, with ASA II or III and a BMI less than 30, were enrolled. females were divided into three groups at random (35 female/each): ES, PECSII(PE) or TE.
Results: Time to perform block was longest in TE Group, VAS was lower in PECSII and ES Groups compared to TE Group at various postoperative intervals. Analgesic consumption was also reduced in the PECSII and ES groups. Intraoperative hemodynamics were lowest in TE Group in the first 6 hours then increased. Patient satisfaction scores were highest with the PECSII Group, followed closely by ES Group. Stress markers were highest in group TE.
Conclusion: The US guided single-shot PECSII offers superior analgesic efficacy, patient satisfaction, and safety compared to TE Analgesia and ES block for postoperative pain management following simple mastectomy. PECSII showed shorter block performance time, lower pain scores, delayed first morphine request time, and reduced total 24-hour analgesic consumption compared to TE and ES.
References
2. Rosenberger DC and Pogatzki-Zahn EM. Chronic post-surgical pain–update on incidence, risk factors and preventive treatment options. BJA education, 2022; 22(5), 190.
3. Łukasiewicz S, Czeczelewski M, Forma A, et al. Breast Cancer—Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Prognostic Markers, and Current Treatment Strategies—An Updated Review. Cancers. 2021; 13(17):4287.
4. González-Roldán AM, Terrasa JL, Sitges C, et al. Age-Related Changes in Pain Perception Are Associated with Altered Functional Connectivity During Resting State. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020; 12:116
5. Selvi O and Tulgar S. Use of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in segmental mastectomy. Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation. 2019; 47(2):158.
6. An R, Wang D, Liang XL, et al. The postoperative analgesic efficacy of different regional anesthesia techniques in breast cancer surgery: A network meta-analysis. Frontiers in Oncology. 2023; 13: 108-112.
7. Ahmed I and Abdelraouf H. Ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane block versus thoracic epidural for post-mastectomy analgesia. Al-Azhar International Medical Journal. 2020; 1(2):33–36.
8. Singh S, Andaleeb R and Lalin D. Can ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block replace thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing thoracotomy? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2022; 25(4):429-34.
9. Sawsan GM and Horia AF. Ultrasound guided PECS II block versus thoracic epidural in modified radical mastectomy for post-operative pain relief. The Medical Journal of Cairo University. 2019; 87: 4433-9.
10. Abdel-Momen MA, Elkhateeb SE, Abdel-Raoof HS, et al. Comparative study between ultrasound guided pectoral nerves block and thoracic epidural as analgesia in breast surgeries. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2018; 72(9):5304-12.
11. ELdeen HM. Ultrasound guided pectoral nerve blockade versus thoracic spinal blockade for conservative breast surgery in cancer breast: a randomized controlled trial. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2016; 32(1):29-35.
12. Bakeer A and Abdallah NM. Erector spinae plane block versus pecs block type ii for breast surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. 2022; 12(2): 468.
13. Khorasanizadeh S, Arabzadeh B, Teymourian H, et al. Pectoral nerve block and erector spinae plane block and post-breast surgery complications. International Journal of Cancer Management. 2020; 13(3): 47-48.
14. Sinha C, Kumar A, Kumar A, et al. Pectoral nerve versus erector spinae block for breast surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2019; 63(8): 617-22.
15. Abdel Fattah ME, Ibrahim OS, Gouda NM, et al. Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared to Ultrasound Guided Modified Pectoral Nerves Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Single Blinded Study. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2022; 38(1):559-64.
16. Altıparmak B, Toker MK, Uysal Aİ, et al. Comparison of the effects of modified pectoral nerve block and erector spinae plane block on postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores of patients after radical mastectomy surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2019; 54:61-5.
17. Gad M, Abdelwahab K, Abdallah A, et al. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block compared to modified pectoral plane block for modified radical mastectomy operations. Anesthesia Essays and Research. 2019; 13(2):334-9.