FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF COLON TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM OF MESALAMINE

Main Article Content

Sanjay Shahurao Popale
Asmita Tarkase
Ashok A. Chopane
Pratiksha A. Shinde
Abhijeet B. Thorat
Afroj A. Shaikh
Dr. Manisha Zaware
Rajiya A. Khan
Swati D. Bankar

Keywords

Colon-targeted tablet, Mesalamine, Xanthan gum, Guar gum, in-vitro release

Abstract

Conventional drug delivery systems for treating colon disorders, such as inflammatory bowel diseases, infections, and colon cancer, often fail due to insufficient drug concentrations reaching the targeted site. Therefore, the development of effective, site-specific drug delivery systems presents a significant challenge in pharmaceutical technology. A major obstacle is the premature absorption or degradation of active ingredients in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, which must be addressed for successful colonic drug delivery. Mesalamine, a drug commonly used to treat ulcerative colitis, has a half-life of 5-7 hours, is water-insoluble, and exhibits low oral bioavailability (20-30%). This study aimed to develop colon-targeted matrix tablets of Mesalamine using xanthan gum and guar gum to improve drug release in the colon. The tablets were evaluated for hardness, friability, weight variation, drug content uniformity, swelling index, and in-vitro drug dissolution. FT-IR analysis confirmed no interactions among the drug, polymers, and excipients. A 3² factorial design was employed to assess the effects of varying amounts of xanthan and guar gum on formulation characteristics. Rheological properties, including bulk and tapped densities, compressibility index, Hausner’s ratio, and angle of repose, were also measured. Tablets were compressed using a 10-station R&D tablet press with 13 mm flat-faced punches and further evaluated for physicochemical properties and drug release profile using USP Type I dissolution apparatus at 50 rpm. Simulated colonic conditions were maintained during in-vitro release studies, and stability testing was conducted at 40°C/75% RH for 180 days. Statistical analysis indicated that formulation variables significantly influenced matrix integrity and drug release (P < 0.05). Formulation F3, which demonstrated optimal release characteristics, was selected for long-term stability studies. Results showed no significant changes in drug content or dissolution profiles, confirming the stability of the formulation.

Abstract 391 | PDF Downloads 124

References

1. Philip, A. K., & Philip, B. (2010). Colon targeted drug delivery systems: A review on primary and novel approaches. Oman Medical Journal, 25(1), 70-78.
2. Ratnaparkhi, M. P., & Somvanshi, F. U. (2013). Colon targeted drug delivery system. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Review, 2(8), 33-42.
3. Prathap, M., Gulshan, M. D., & Rama, R. (2014). Colon targeted drug delivery system – A review. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Nano Sciences, 3(5), 429-437.
4. Bhandari, N. T., Bali, T., Sumeena, S., & Choudhary, S. (2017). Colon targeted drug delivery system: A review. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6(4), 364-377.
5. Prasanth, V. V., Jayaprakash, R., & Mathew, S. T. (2012). Colon specific drug delivery systems: A review on various pharmaceutical approaches. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 02(01), 163-169.
6. Bussemer, T. O., & Bodmeier, R. (2003). Pulsatile drug-delivery systems. Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 18(5), 433-458.
7. Patel, A., Bhatt, N., Patel, K. R., Patel, N. M., & Patel, M. R. (2011). Colon targeted drug delivery system: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Bio-Research, 1(1), 37-49.
8. Nagpal, D., Gairola, R. S., Bodhankar, S. L., & Suneela, S. D. (2006). Mutual azo prodrug of 5-aminosalicylic acid for colon targeted drug delivery: Synthesis, kinetic studies, and pharmacological evaluation. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 68(2), 171-178.
9. Gupta, D., Mhaske, D. V., Kadam, S. S., & Dhaneshwar, S. R. (2004). Synthesis and evaluation of pharmacological activities of cyclodextrin conjugate of methotrexate. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 66(1), 26-30.
10. Nakamura, J., Asai, K., Nishida, K., & Sasaki, H. (1992). A novel prodrug of salicylic acid, salicylic acid and glutamic acid conjugate utilizing hydrolysis in rabbit intestinal microorganism. Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 40(10), 2164-2168.
11. Singh, G., Kumar, D., Singh, M., Sharma, D., & Kaur, S. (2012). Emerging techniques and challenges in colon drug delivery systems. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2(3), 142-145.
12. Gurpreet, K., Subheet, J., & Ashok, K. T. (2010). Investigations on microbially triggered system for colon delivery of budesonide. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 5, 96.
13. Lenaerts, V., & Gurny, R. (1990). Bioadhesive drug delivery systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 107-123.
14. Philip, A. K., & Pathak, K. (2006). Osmotic flow through asymmetric membrane: A means for controlled delivery of drugs with varying solubility. AAPS PharmSciTech, 7(3), 1-11.
15. Masataka, K., Watanabe, S., Takemura, S., Sako, K., Sawada, T., Masuda, Y., et al. (2004). Scintigraphic evaluation of a novel colon-targeted delivery system (CODESTM) in healthy volunteers. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 93(5), 1287-1299.
16. Gangurde, H. H., Chordiya, M. A., Tamizharasi, S., & Sivakumar, T. (2012). Diseases, approaches, and evaluation parameters for colon-specific drug delivery: A review. International Journal of Drug Research and Technology, 2(3), 239-262.
17. Subra, K., Robert, H., Raymond, G., Janice, H., Gregorz, T., Khan, F., et al. (2003). Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease alliance: Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of children with newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease in Wisconsin: A statewide population-based study. Journal of Pediatrics, 143, 525-531.
18. Brignola, C., Cottone, M., Pera, A., & Ardizzone, S. (1995). Mesalamine in the prevention of endoscopic recurrence after intestinal resection for Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology, 108, 345-349.
19. Biswal, P. K., Kumar, A., & Bhadouriya, A. S. (2013). Design and evolution of colon-specific drug delivery system. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Biological Sciences, 3(1), 150-167.
20.
21. Qureshi, A. M., Momin, M., Rathod, S., & Dev, A. (2013). Colon targeted drug delivery system: A review on current approaches. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Bio-Research, 1(4), 130-147.
22. Gupta, K., Roy, S. B., & Singhvi, I. (2015). Preformulation study in the development of a tablet formulation for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Drug Analysis, 6(3), 214-222.
23. United States Pharmacopeia, National Formulary Vol-II. (2009). p. 1398.
24. Martindale. (1996). Extra Pharmacopoeia (Royal Pharmaceutical Society, London). pp. 1228-1230.
25. Indian Pharmacopoeia. (2010). Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India, Vol-III, pp. 1418-1420.
26. Sharma, Y. R. (2005). Elementary organic spectroscopy: Principles and chemical applications. Chand S and Company Ltd. pp. 79-132.
27. Joseph, J., Matthew, F., & Hongyan, Z. (2014). Determining the optimal parameters of bonding polyvinylchloride to stainless steel in automotive applications with the use of full factorial design of experiment. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 7, 151-158.
28. Afifi, S. A., Mandour, W. M., & Elkhodairy, K. A. (2015). Optimization of a novel oral colon delivery system of indomethacin using full factorial design. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 14(5), 761-768.
29. Shinkar, P., & Dehghan, M. H. G. (2014). Studies on microbially triggered enteric coated tablets for colon-targeted delivery of mesalamine. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 5(9), 3704-3712.
30. Rajeswari, P., Kiranmai, T., & Manthrunaik, D. (2016). Formulation and characterization of colon-specific drug delivery system of a matrix tablet. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Life Sciences, 2(2), 330-348.
31. Vishal Ramesh Rasve, Anup Kumar Chakraborty, Sachin Kumar Jain, & Sudha Vengurlekar. (2022). Comparative evaluation of antidiabetic activity of ethanolic leaves extract of clematis triloba and their SMEDDS formulation in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 29(04), 959–971.
32. Lieberman, H. A., Lachman, L., & Schwartz, J. B. (1990). Pharmaceutical dosage forms: Tablets (Vol. 2). New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 201-243.
33. Indian Pharmacopoeia. (1996). Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India, Vol-II, pp. 569-563.
34. Sharma, M., Joshi, B., & Bansal, M. (2012). Formulation and evaluation of colon-targeted tablets of mesalazine. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapy, 2(5), 24-36.
35. United States Pharmacopeia 23, The National Formulary 18. (1995). Asian Edition. MD: United States Pharmacopeia Convention, Inc, p. 1790.
36. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline. (2003). Stability testing of new drug substances and products Q1A (R2). Current Step 4 Version, pp. 1-23.

Most read articles by the same author(s)