COMPARING THE EFFECTS OF LOADING DOSE OF ROSUVASTATIN VS ATORVASTATIN ON IMMEDIATE POST-PERFUSION TIMI FLOW IN PRIMARY PCI PATIENTS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Rosuvastatin, Atorvastatin, TIMI flow, Primary PCI, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
Abstract
Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requires rapid intervention to restore blood flow, often achieved through primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Statins like rosuvastatin and atorvastatin are commonly used during PCI for their cholesterol-lowering and plaque-stabilizing effects. However, the specific impact of loading doses of these statins on immediate post-perfusion TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) flow has not been thoroughly investigated.
Objective: The primary objective of this study was to compare the effects of loading doses of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on immediate post-perfusion TIMI flow in patients undergoing primary PCI.
Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at Lahore Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan, from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. A total of 246 patients undergoing primary PCI for ACS were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either a loading dose of rosuvastatin (40 mg) or atorvastatin (80 mg). TIMI flow grade was assessed immediately post-perfusion using coronary angiography. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 30 days post-procedure. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0, employing chi-square tests for categorical variables and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for time-to-event data.
Results: The rosuvastatin group showed a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving TIMI grade 3 flow immediately post-PCI (74.8%) compared to the atorvastatin group (65.9%) (p = 0.04). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of 30-day MACE rates (rosuvastatin: 7.3%, atorvastatin: 10.6%; p = 0.35).
Conclusion: The administration of a loading dose of rosuvastatin resulted in a higher rate of optimal coronary perfusion (TIMI grade 3 flow) immediately after PCI compared to atorvastatin. These findings suggest that rosuvastatin may be more effective in enhancing immediate coronary reperfusion, potentially improving clinical outcomes in ACS patients undergoing PCI.
References
2. Ridker PM, Lüscher TF. Anti-inflammatory therapies for cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(27):1782-1791. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu203.
3. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, et al. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(25):2387-2397. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1410489.
4. Tóth PP, Potter D, Ming EE. Prevalence of lipid abnormalities in the United States: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2006. J Clin Lipidol. 2012;6(4):325-330. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2012.05.002.
5. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, et al. Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(22):2097-2107. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1801174.
6. Ray KK, Cannon CP, McCabe CH, et al; PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Investigators. Early and late benefits of high-dose atorvastatin in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results from the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(8):1405-1410. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.077.
7. Muhammad S, Khan AJ, Ali NA, Akhtar F, Rasool H, Khan N, Rehman S, Shah SH. Prevalence of risk factors for coronary artery disease in Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Trop J Pharm Res. 2016;15(1):27. doi:10.4314/tjpr.v15i1.27.
8. Thim T, Götberg M, Fröbert O, et al. High-dose rosuvastatin vs high-dose atorvastatin in stable coronary artery disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321(11):1069-1080. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.2259.
9. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(21):2195-2207. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0807646.
10. Yamada T, Akao M, Matsumoto T, et al. Beneficial effects of high-dose rosuvastatin on endothelial function and inflammation in patients with coronary artery disease: results from the SATURN-Japan trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15:12. doi:10.1186/s12933-016-0328-9.
11. Wiviott SD, Cannon CP, Morrow DA, et al. Differential effects of two intensive statin regimens on clinical outcomes after acute coronary syndromes: a PROVE IT-TIMI 22 substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(3):346-352. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.016.
12. Mehran R, Dangas G, Weisbord SD, et al. Statins in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(1):71-80. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.045.
13. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883-891. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1009638.
14. Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(15):1495-1504. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040583.
15. Stein JH, Melloni C, Cannon CP, et al. Statins in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes: the GRACE Investigators. Am J Med. 2009;122(11):1074-1081. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.03.024.
16. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9326):7-22. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09327-3.