PHENOTYPIC IDENTIFICATION OF AMPC BETA-LACTAMASE AND ESBL IN CLINICAL ISOLATES OF COMMON GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITALS
Main Article Content
Keywords
AmpC beta-lactamase, Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), Gram-negative bacteria, Antibiotic resistance, Phenotypic identification
Abstract
Background: The emergence of antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, particularly those producing AmpC beta-lactamases and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), poses a significant challenge in clinical settings. This study aimed to phenotypically identify the prevalence of AmpC and ESBL producers among common Gram-negative bacterial isolates in a tertiary care hospital.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at [Institution Name] from January 2024 to September 2024. A total of 180 clinical isolates were collected from various specimens. Gram-negative bacilli were identified using standard microbiological techniques, and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. The production of AmpC and ESBL was determined using specific phenotypic tests, including the double-disc synergy test and inhibition zone measurement.
Results: Out of 180 isolates, 65 Gram-negative bacilli were identified, with Escherichia coli (33.8%) being the most prevalent organism, followed by Klebsiellapneumoniae (24.6%). The study revealed alarming resistance rates to key antibiotics, with E. coli showing 90.9% resistance to cefoxitin. A total of 24 isolates (36.9%) were confirmed as ESBL producers, while 15 (23%) produced AmpC beta-lactamase. Notably, 8 isolates (12.3%) exhibited dual ESBL and AmpC production.
Conclusion: The findings underscore a significant prevalence of AmpC and ESBL production among clinically relevant Gram-negative bacteria. This highlights the urgent need for robust antibiotic stewardship programs and regular surveillance of resistance patterns to effectively manage and treat infections caused by these multidrug-resistant organisms. Continued efforts are necessary to optimize the use of existing antibiotics and mitigate the rise of resistance in clinical settings.
References
2. Paterson DL, Bonomo RA. Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases: A Clinical Update. ClinMicrobiol Rev. 2005;18(4):657-686.
3. Tzeng YL, et al. Prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Hospitalized Patients. Infect Control HospEpidemiol. 2020;41(2):224-230.
4. Kaur M, et al. Epidemiology of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018;13:103-108.
5. Gonzalez M, et al. AmpC Beta-Lactamases: A Review. J AntimicrobChemother. 2020;75(5):1141-1150.
6. Al-Tamini S, et al. The Role of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Reducing Antibiotic Resistance. Infect PrevPract. 2019;1(2):100027.
7. Karpagasundaram S, et al. Evaluation of Phenotypic Methods for Detection of AmpC Beta-Lactamase. J ClinMicrobiol. 2019;57(3)
8. Sinha S, et al. Comparative Study on Phenotypic Methods for Detection of ESBLs. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2021;39(1):12-17.
9. Richter SS, et al. Detection of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae. ClinMicrobiol Rev. 2019;32(2)
10. Hsu JT, et al. Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: A Global Perspective. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1290.
11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. M100. 2021.
12. Tzeng YL, et al. Prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Hospitalized Patients. Infect Control HospEpidemiol. 2020;41(2):224-230.
13. Dierikx CM, et al. Monitoring antimicrobial resistance in livestock. Vet Microbiol. 2013;162(1):1-9.
14. Klein EY, Van Boeckel TP, Martinez EM, et al. Global increase in bacterial resistance rates and its impact on antimicrobial resistance and public health. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(2):179-181.
15. Bassetti M, Giacobbe DR, Alessandri F, et al. Antimicrobial resistance: the role of international guidelines. CurrOpin Infect Dis. 2018;31(4):341-347.
16. Tzeng YL, Chang YT, Chen T, et al. Prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in hospitalized patients. Infect Control HospEpidemiol. 2020;41(2):224-230.
17. Patel G, Bonomo RA, Van Duin D. A current perspective on carbapenemases.Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2018;16(7):501-513.
18. Gonzalez M, Toleman MA, Jones R, et al. AmpC beta-lactamases: A review. J AntimicrobChemother. 2020;75(5):1141-1150.
19. Al-Tamini S, Al-Khalidi B, Baqai M. The role of antimicrobial stewardship programs in reducing antibiotic resistance. Infect PrevPract. 2019;1(2):100027.
20. Harris PNB, Tambyah PA, Lye DC, et al. Antimicrobial resistance: the past, the present, and the future. Med J Aust. 2015;203(5):199-204.
21. Gould IM, Bal AM. New antibiotic agents in the pipeline and how they will influence antibiotic resistance.Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2017;15(4):261-266.