A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF TWO-HANDED MASK VENTILATION TECHNIQUES IN ANAESTHETISED APNOEIC ADULTS
Main Article Content
Keywords
C-E Technique, V-E Technique, Two-Handed Mask Ventilation
Abstract
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bag mask ventilation is an important and basic airway management skill. Providing adequate bag mask ventilation in an effective manner can reverse the effect of hypoxia thereby rescuing the patient from potential brain damage as well as death if intubation is impossible. Two handed C-E technique and V-E technique mask ventilation are commonly used for maintaining mask ventilation in apneic patients. In this study we wanted to compare the efficacy of the C-E and V-E techniques of mask ventilation in terms of expired tidal volume.
METHODS: 80 patients of ASA PS I/II posted for general surgeries under general endotracheal anaesthesia were taken for the face mask ventilation study after obtaining written informed consent from them at JSS Medical College and Hospital, Mysuru. Patients were allocated into the C-E and V-E techniques by random computer allocation. They were then preoxygenated with an anatomical face mask with 100% oxygen, and anaesthesia was induced using standard institutional protocol.
RESULTS: There is a significantly higher tidal volume generated for the V-E technique compared to the C-E technique irrespective of the order of ventilation (P value of 0.001), with a mean of 490.82 mL for the C-E and 515.41 mL for the V-E. On comparing average tidal volumes in C-E to V-E order, we found a significantly higher value for V-E than C-E (p-value 0.002). On comparing average tidal volumes in V-E to C-E order, we found a significantly higher value for V-E than C-E (p-value of 0.001). In V-E, we found higher peak inspiratory pressure irrespective of the presentation (p-value of 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Of the different techniques of two-handed mask ventilation employed, significantly higher tidal volume is generated with the V-E technique in comparison with the C-E technique, and it is concluded that the V-E technique is superior to the C-E technique.
References
[2] Carlson JN, Wang HE. Updates in emergency airway management. Curr Opin Crit Care 2018;24(6):525–30.
[3] Ozsancak A, Sidhom SS, Liesching TN, Howard W, Hill NS. Evaluation of the total face mask for noninvasive ventilation to treat acute respiratory failure. Chest 2011;139(5):1034–41.
[4] Durbin CG, Bell CT, Shilling AM. Elective intubation discussion. Respiratory Care 2014;59(6):825–49.
[5] Fei M, Blair JL, Rice MJ, Edwards DA, Liang Y, Pilla MA, et al. Comparison of effectiveness of two commonly used two-handed mask ventilation techniques on unconscious apnoeic obese adults. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia 2017;118(4):618–24.
[6] Amack AJ, Barber GA, Ng PC, Smith TB, April MD. Comparison of ventilation with one-handed mask seal with an intraoral mask versus conventional cuffed face mask in a cadaver model: a randomized crossover trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2017;69(1):12-7.
[7] Campbell TP, Stewart RD, Kaplan RM, DeMichiel RV, Morton R. Oxygen enrichment of bag-valve-mask units during positive-pressure ventilation: A comparison of various techniques. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1988;17(3):232-5.
[8] Hart D, Reardon R, Ward C, Miner J. Face mask ventilation: a comparison of three techniques. J Emerg Med 2013;44(5):1028-33.
[9] Gerstein NS, Carey MC, Braude DA, Tawil I, Petersen TR, Deriy L, et al. Efficacy of facemask ventilation techniques in novice providers. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2013;25(3):193-7.
[10] Davidovic L, LaCovey D, Pitetti RD. Comparison of 1- versus 2-person bag-valve-mask techniques for manikin ventilation of infants and children. Ann Emerg Med 2005;46(1):37-42.
[11] Joffe AM, Hetzel S, Liew EC. A Two-handed Jaw-thrust Technique Is Superior to the One-handed “EC-clamp” Technique for Mask Ventilation in the Apneic Unconscious Person. Anesthesiology 2010;113(4):873-9.
[12] Benyamin RM, Wafai Y, Salem MR, Joseph NJ. Two-handed mask ventilation of the difficult airway by a single individual. Anesthesiology 1998;88(4):1134.
[13] Bouvet L, Albert M-L, Augris C, Boselli E, Ecochard R, Rabilloud M, et al. Real-time detection of gastric insufflation related to facemask pressure-controlled ventilation using ultrasonography of the antrum and epigastric auscultation in nonparalyzed patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anesthesiology 2014;120(2):326-34.
[14] Isono S, Eikermann M, Odaka T. Facemask ventilation during induction of anesthesia: how ‘gentle’ is ‘gentle’ enough? Anesthesiology 2014;120(2):263-5.
[15] Isono S. One hand, two hands, or no hands for maximizing airway maneuvers? Anesthesiology 2008;109(4):576-7.
[16] Isono S, Tanaka A, Tagaito Y, Sho Y, Nishino T. Pharyngeal patency in response to advancement of the mandible in obese anesthetized persons. Anesthesiology 1997;87(5):1055-62.
[17] Tsuiki S, Isono S, Ishikawa T, Yamashiro Y, Tatsumi K, Nishino T. Anatomical balance of the upper airway and obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 2008;108(6):1009-15.
[18] Otten D, Liao MM, Wolken R, Douglas IS, Mishra R, Kao A, et al. Comparison of bag-valve-mask hand-sealing techniqu