SURVEY OF THE TECHNIQUES OF RAPID SEQUENCE INTUBATION BY PRACTICING ANESTHESIOLOGISTS IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITALS OF KARACHI - A CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY

Main Article Content

Dr. Muhammad Waqas Khan
Dr.Syed Hassan Adil Rizvi
Dr. Komal Zafar
Dr. Atif Parvez
Dr. Asir Nasiruddin
Sajid Atif Aleem

Keywords

Anesthesiology, Intubation, Rapid Sequence Induction, Technique, Ventilation

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI) is a key technique to reduce aspiration risk during emergency surgeries, involving preoxygenation, intravenous anesthesia, cricoid pressure, and rapid intubation without mask ventilation. Debate persists over optimal positioning and cricoid pressure application, with variations in practice. While some believe preoxygenation suffices for low-risk patients, others stress strict protocols for safety. Further research on these discrepancies could help standardize techniques and reduce this preventable complication.


Objective To evaluate the techniques of Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) among anesthesiologists in tertiary care hospitals of Karachi and identify variations in practice.


Materials and Method: This cross-sectional investigation, performed from November 2021 until May 2022 across nine tertiary medical centers in Karachi, aimed to assess anesthesia practices among 87 anesthesiologists. Employing a non-random, successive sampling method, the research targeted consultants, specialists, and final-year FCPS residents. Information was collected through self-administered questionnaires regarding demographics and anesthesia practices, such as patient positioning and cricoid pressure utilization. Analysis in SPSS 26.0 involved descriptive and inferential analytics to explore practice patterns and relationships, with statistical significance established at p<0.05.


Results:  Among respondents, 64% were male and 35.6% female, with most aged 31-40 years (42.5%) and 34.5% having 6-10 years of experience. Only 4.6% of anesthesiologists were trained in using gastric ultrasound, while 89.7% followed standard RSI procedures. In cases of intestinal obstruction, 62.1% of patients were positioned supine, compared to 77.0% in non-obstruction cases. Cricoid pressure was applied in 94.4% of obstruction cases, and nasogastric tubes were inserted in 56.3% of those patients.


Conclusion: It may be inferred that the majority of practitioners adhered to standardised protocols, including regular cricoid pressure and supine placement, especially in non-obstructed patients. The use of nasogastric tubes and gastric ultrasonography was irregular and uncommon. The inconsistency in procedures underscores the necessity for standardisation and enhanced training in sophisticated techniques such as stomach ultrasonography and patient positioning, hence guaranteeing safer anaesthesia care.

Abstract 286 | PDF Downloads 94

References

1. Algie CM, Mahar RK, Tan HB, Wilson G, Mahar PD, Wasiak J. Effectiveness and risks of cricoid pressure during rapid sequence induction for endotracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(11):Cd011656.
2. Zdravkovic M, Rice MJ, Brull SJ. The clinical use of cricoid pressure: first, do no harm. J Anesth Analg. 2019.
3. Whitaker D, Brattebo G, Trenkler S, Vanags I, Petrini F, Aykac Z, et al. The European Board of Anaesthesiology recommendations for safe medication practice: first update. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(1):4-7.
4. Pierre MS, Krischke F, Luetcke B, Schmidt J. The influence of different patient positions during rapid induction with severe regurgitation on the volume of aspirate and time to intubation: a prospective randomised manikin simulation study. J BMC anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):1-9.
5. Birenbaum A, Hajage D, Roche S, Ntouba A, Eurin M, Cuvillon P, et al. Effect of cricoid pressure compared with a sham procedure in the rapid sequence induction of anesthesia: the IRIS randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(1):9-17.
6. Sajayan A, Wicker J, Ungureanu N, Mendonca C, Kimani PK. Current practice of rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia in the UK - a national survey. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117 Suppl 1(suppl 1):169-74.
7. Mencke T, Zitzmann A, Reuter D. Certain and controversial components of rapid sequence induction. J Der Anaesthesist. 2018;67(4):305.
8. Lee D, Czech A, Elriedy M, Nair A, El Boghdadly K, Ahmad I. A multicentre prospective cohort study of the accuracy of conventional landmark technique for cricoid localisation using ultrasound scanning. J Anaesthesia. 2018;73(10):1229-34.
9. Charlesworth M, Wiles M. Preoperative gastric ultrasound-should we look inside Schrödinger's gut? J Anaesthesia. 2019,74(1):109-12.
10. Bernhard M, Becker TK, Gries A, Knapp J, Wenzel V. The first shot is often the best shot: first-pass intubation success in emergency airway management. J Anesthesia Analgesia. 2015;121(5):1389-93.
11. Mir F, Patel A, Iqbal R, Cecconi M, Nouraei SA. A randomised controlled trial comparing transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) pre oxygenation with facemask pre-oxygenation in patients undergoing rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(4):439-43.
12. Morris J, Cook TM. Rapid sequence induction: a national survey of practice. Anaesthesia. 2001;56(11):1090–7.
13. Sajayan A, Wicker J, Ungureanu N, Mendonca C, Kimani PK. Current practice of rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia in the UK - a national survey. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117: 69–74.
14. Barrett Mørk FC, Gade C, Thielsen M, Frederiksen MS, Arpi M, Johannesen J, et al. Poor compliance with antimicrobial guidelines for childhood pneumonia. Dan Med J. 2018;65( 11).
15. Jam R, Mesquida J, Hernández Ó, Sandalinas I, Turégano C, Carrillo E, Pedragosa R, et al. Nursing workload and compliance with non-pharmacological measures to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multicentre study. Nurs Crit Care. 2018;23(6):291-8.
16. Bhananker SM, Ramamoorthy C, Geiduschek JM, Posner KL, Domino KB, Haberkern CM, et al. Anesthesia-related cardiac arrest in children: update from the Pediatric Perioperative Cardiac Arrest Registry. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(2):344-50.
17. Neilipovitz DT, Crosby ET. No evidence for decreased incidence of aspiration after rapid sequence induction. Can J Anesth. 2007;54(9):748-64.
18. Hayes AH, Breslin DS, Mirakhur RK, Reid JE, O'Hare RA. Frequency of haemoglobin desaturation with the use of succinylcholine during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Acta Anaesth Scand. 2001;45(6):746-9.
19. Heier T, Feiner JR, Lin J, Brown R, Caldwell JE. Hemoglobin desaturation after succinylcholine-induced apnea: a study of the recovery of spontaneous ventilation in healthy volunteers. J Am Soc Anesthesiol. 2001;94(5):754-9.
20. Zelicof-Paul A, Smith-Lockridge A, Schnadower D, Tyler S, Levin S, Roskind C, et al. Controversies in rapid sequence intubation in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005;17(3): 355-62.
21. Stedeford J, Stoddart P. RSI in pediatric anesthesia–is it used by nonpediatric anesthetists? A survey from South‐West England. Pediatr Anesth. 2007;17(3):235-42.

Most read articles by the same author(s)