PORT SITE COMPLICATIONS IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY: INSIGHTS AND OUTCOMES FROM A TEACHING HOSPITAL

Main Article Content

Dr. Tony Mathew
Dr. Justine Samuel Johney
Dr. Naveen George
Dr. Obed Manuel Kuruvilla
Dr. Renji Mathew
Dr. Denny Philip

Keywords

Minimally Invasive Surgery, laparoscopy, port site complications, port site infection

Abstract

Port site complications (PSCs) diminish the advantages of minimally invasive surgeries, increasing patient morbidity and affecting the surgeon's reputation. This study aims to identify the types of complications associated with port sites in laparoscopic procedures, explore their potential causes, and propose preventive measures. In this prospective study, we evaluated 200 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries at our centre from April 2022 to March 2024, focusing on port site complications and assessing the significance of various factors.


The mean age of the patients was 42.82 ± 16.24 years and the overall incidence of PSCs was found to be 8.5%. Our analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the number of ports used and the incidence of port site complications, with a p-value of 0.0035. Additionally, we found a statistically significant association between Body Mass Index (BMI) and the occurrence of port site complications, with a p-value of less than 0.0001.


These findings underscore the importance of considering the number of ports and BMI as key factors in minimizing the risk of PSCs in laparoscopic surgeries.

Abstract 179 | Pdf Downloads 12

References

1. Batirov DY, Kh AA, Rakhimov AP, Sheniyazov Sh. S, Rojobov RR. Improving the results of simultaneous laparoscopic surgery in patients with chronic deficiency. EJMMP. 2023;3(2):43–5.
2. Wang Y, Yang J-W, Yan S-Y, Lu Y, Han J-G, Pei W, et al. Electroacupuncture vs sham electroacupuncture in the treatment of postoperative ileus after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;158(1):20-27
3. Walk CT, Nowak R, Parikh PP, Crawford TN, Woods RJ. Perception versus reality: A review of narcotic prescribing habits after common laparoscopic surgeries. J Surg 2023;283:188–93
4. Shah KK, Galani KJ, Nathwani MT. A study of laparoscopic port site complications – A descriptive study in a tertiary care hospital. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2024; 14(3): 413-417.
5. Gao X, Peng Z, Li E, Tian J. Modified minimally invasive laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion with internal fixation. Ren Fail. 2023;45(1)
6. Marton I, Sever M, Prka M, Šerman A, Tupek T, Klancir T. A rare case of giant 5 mm port-site preperitoneal small-bowel incarceration without fascial defect following laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol;43(1).
7. Hassler KR, Collins JT, Philip K, Jones MW. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
8. Mannam R, Sankara Narayanan R, Bansal A, Yanamaladoddi VR, Sarvepalli SS, Vemula SL, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: A literature review. Cureus 2023;15(9)
9. Alius C, Serban D, Bratu DG, Tribus LC, Vancea G, Stoica PL, et al. When critical view of safety fails: A practical perspective on difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023;59(8):1491
10. Miti C, Busuulwa P, Scott R, Bloomfield-Gadelha H. Primary entry trocar design and entry-related complications at laparoscopy in obese patients: meta-analysis. BJS Open. 2023;7(3)