COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WORK DIFFICULTIES IN OFFICE WORKERS WITH MIGRAINE AND CERVICOGENIC HEADACHE

Main Article Content

Teenat Aroob
Hira Nawaz
Azqa Arif
Ayesha Ashraf
Samraiz Mughal

Keywords

Cervicogenic headache Migraine, Headache, Office workers, Work difficulties

Abstract

Migraine and cervicogenic headaches are common neurological conditions that can


significantly affect an individual’s quality of life and work productivity


Aim and objective : To determine  comparative analysis of work difficulties in office workers with migraine and cervicogenic headache


Material and Methods : This observational cross-sectional study was conducted on office workers.The sample size was 120 . Non-Probability purposive sampling technique was used. Ages 16-30, both genders, with migraine or cervicogenic headache symptoms lasting at least three months were included . HIT-6 used as assessment tool.Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25.


Results :  Revealed 53.3% of cervicogenic headache patients reported "Always" experiencing severe pain compared to only 13.3% of migraine sufferers, which is consistent with studies highlighting the chronic and persistent nature of cervicogenic headaches, which are often associated with neck issues and can be more consistently severe than migraine.30.0% of those with cervicogenic headaches always wish to lie down during a headache, compared to 10.0% of migraine sufferers. A significant 41.7% of cervicogenic headache sufferers reported very frequent concentration issues, compared to 18.3% of migraine sufferers. The crosstabulation shows a significant association (χ² = 0.001) between headache type and impact severity. Cervicogenic Headache sufferers mainly reported severe impact, while Migraine sufferers had a more balanced distribution between substantial and severe effects.


Conclusion : The study concluded that cervicogenic headaches are considerably more debilitating and longer-lasting than migraine headaches, which, while acute, result in significant fatigue and emotional upset

Abstract 332 | Pdf Downloads 148

References

1. Piovesan EJ, Utiumi MAT, Grossi DB. Cervicogenic headache–How to recognize and treat. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2024:101931.
2. Satpute K, Rathod R, Hall T. Reliability and measurement properties of upper cervical flexionextension range of motion testing in people with cervicogenic headache and asymptomatic controls. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2024;32(2):182-9.
3. Pardos-Aguilella P, Ceballos-Laita L, Cabanillas-Barea S, Pérez-Guillén S, Ciuffreda G, CarrascoUribarren A. Is device guided training targeted to the craniocervical flexor and extensor muscles efficacious? A preliminary randomized controlled trial in a cervicogenic headache population. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2024;69:102900.
4. İlter SE, Gökçe A. Assessment of chiropractic intervention influence on pain and life quality in cervicogenic headache afflicted office workers: a review. The European Research Journal. 2023:1-9.
5. Magnavita N. Headache in the workplace: analysis of factors influencing headaches in terms of productivity and health. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2022;19(6):3712.
6. Florencio LL, de Oliveira AS, Pinheiro CF, Will-Lemos T, Dach F, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, et al. Comparison of cervical muscle isometric force between migraine subgroups or migraineassociated neck pain: A controlled study. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):15434.
7. Núñez‐Cabaleiro P, Leirós‐Rodríguez R. Effectiveness of manual therapy in the treatment of cervicogenic headache: A systematic review. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2022;62(3):271-83.
8. Verma S, Tripathi M, Chandra PS. Cervicogenic headache: Current perspectives. Neurology India. 2021;69(Suppl 1):S194-S8.
9. Nunes A, Petersen K, Espanha M, Arendt-Nielsen L. Sensitization in office workers with chronic neck pain in different pain conditions and intensities. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 2021;21(3):457-73.
10. Mingels S, Dankaerts W, van Etten L, Thijs H, Granitzer M. Comparative analysis of head-tilt and forward head position during laptop use between females with postural induced headache and healthy controls. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies. 2016;20(3):533-41.
11. Jamil T, Gul H, Waqas S, Abbas R. CERVICOGENIC HEADACHE AMONG DENTISTS WORKING IN LAHORE MEDICAL AND DENTAL COLLEGE. Pakistan Journal of Rehabilitation. 2023;12(1):176-83.
12. Ibrahim MYI, Belal TM, Egila HM, Azab AG. Migraine among Neurology outpatient attendants in Mansoura University: Sociodemographic and Migraine comorbidities analysis. Mansoura Medical Journal. 2023;53(1):6.
13. Allais G, Chiarle G, Sinigaglia S, Airola G, Schiapparelli P, Benedetto C. Gender-related differences in migraine. Neurological Sciences. 2020;41:429-36.
14. Sajobi TT, Amoozegar F, Wang M, Wiebe N, Fiest KM, Patten SB, et al. Global assessment of migraine severity measure: preliminary evidence of construct validity. BMC neurology. 2019;19:1-9.
15. Evans RW. Diagnostic testing for migraine and other primary headaches. Neurologic Clinics. 2019;37(4):707-25.
16. Mingels S, Dankaerts W, van Etten L, Bruckers L, Granitzer M. Exploring multidimensional characteristics in cervicogenic headache: Relations between pain processing, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors. Brain and Behavior. 2021;11(10):e2339.
17. Buse DC, Pozo-Rosich P, Dupont-Benjamin L, Balkaran BL, Lee L, Jauregui A, et al. Impact of headache frequency and preventive medication failure on quality of life, functioning, and costs among individuals with migraine across several European countries: need for effective preventive treatment. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2023;24(1):115.

Most read articles by the same author(s)