OUTCOME OF RUBBER BAND LIGATION AS AN OUTPATIENT PROCEDURE FOR HEMORRHOIDS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Rubber band ligation, second degree hemorrhoids, third degree hemorrhoids
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, quality of life, and outcomes of rubber band ligation (RBL) treatment for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids.
Methods. This study is a retrospective analysis of 250 patients who visited the outpatient clinic between September 2020 and December 2021. All of the patients had second- and third-degree internal symptomatic hemorrhoids, and they were all treated as outpatients utilizing the Barron applicator and rubber band ligation. Information was gathered from the patient records. Patients were advised to follow up with the outpatient clinic every two weeks, every 1 and 6 months, and by phone every six months for a period of two years.
Results: 193 patients, or 77% of the total, were cured.
After two years, a symptomatic recurrence was found in 46 patients (18%). Thirteen patients (5%) experienced minor complications related to RBL that did not necessitate hospitalization. Pain, rectal bleeding, and vasovagal symptoms were the complications (2.8, 1.2, and 0.7% of patients, respectively).
Conclusion: RBL is an easy, secure, and successful operation that can be performed as an outpatient to treat symptomatic second- and third-degree hemorrhoids.
References
2. Bernal JC, Enguix M, Lopez Garcia J, Garcia Romero J, Trullenque Peris R. Rubber-band ligation for hemorrhoids in a colorectal unit. A prospective study. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas. 2005 Jan 1;97(1):38-45.
3. Forlini A, Manzelli A, Quaresima S, Forlini M. Long-term result after rubber band ligation for haemorrhoids. International journal of colorectal disease. 2009 Sep;24:1007-10.
4. El Nakeeb AM, Fikry AA, Omar WH, Fouda EM, El Metwally TA, Ghazy HE, Badr SA, Elkhar MY, Elawady SM, Abd Elmoniam HH, Khafagy WW. Rubber band ligation for 750 cases of symptomatic hemorrhoids out of 2200 cases. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. 2008 Nov 11;14(42):6525.
5. Pigot F, Siproudhis L, Allaert FA. Risk factors associated with hemorrhoidal symptoms in specialized consultation. Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique. 2005 Dec 1;29(12):1270-4.
6. Riss S, Weiser FA, Schwameis K, Riss T, Mittlböck M, Steiner G, Stift A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids in adults. International journal of colorectal disease. 2012 Feb;27:215-20.
7. Al-Hadrani AM. Khat induced hemorrhoidal disease in Yemen. Saudi Medical Journal. 2000 May 1;21(5):475-7.
8. Iyer VS, Shrier I, Gordon PH. Long-term outcome of rubber band ligation for symptomatic primary and recurrent internal hemorrhoids. Diseases of the colon & rectum. 2004 Sep;47:1364-70.
9. Yang HK, Yang HK. Nonsurgical treatment of hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoids. 2014:47-63.
10. Giamundo P, Salfi R, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Murru L, Valente M. The hemorrhoid laser procedure technique vs rubber band ligation: a randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatments for second-and third-degree hemorrhoids. Diseases of the colon & rectum. 2011 Jun 1;54(6):693-8.
11. FJ MO, FJ PB, JM HG. Effectiveness of hemorrhoidal treatment by rubber band ligation and infrared photocoagulation. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas. 2001 Apr 1;93(4):238-47.
12. Lohsiriwat V. Hemorrhoids: from basic pathophysiology to clinical management. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. 2012 May 5;18(17):2009.
13. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Diseases of the colon & rectum. 2007 Jun 1;50(6):878-92.
14. Chen JS, You JF. Current status of surgical treatment for hemorrhoids--systematic review and meta-analysis. Chang Gung Med J. 2010 Sep 1;33(5):488-500.
15. Sim HL, Tan KY, Poon PL, Cheng A, Mak K. Life-threatening perineal sepsis after rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids. Techniques in coloproctology. 2009 Jun;13:161-4.
16. Caro A, Olona C, Vicente V, Goncalves C, Jimenez A. Grade 3 haemorrhoidal treatment: rubber band ligation or haemorrhoidectomy–a prospective study. Ambulatory. 2009;13:56.
17. Serventi A, Rassu PC, Giaminardi E, Massobrio A, Vitali GC, Stabilini L. Haemorrhoidal disease: role of conservative outpatient treatments. Annali italiani di chirurgia. 2011;82(5):341-7.
18. AGHAEI AM, Hadavi H, Vahedian M, Poorseyedi B, ZEYNALI NH, LASHKARI ZM, KOUHESTANI PM. Comparative study of staging rubber band ligation (RBL) and hemorrhoidectomy in treatment of forth degree hemorrhoids.
19. Izadpanah A, Hosseini SV, Mahjoob M. Comparison of electrotherapy, rubber band ligation and hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a clinical and manometric study. Middle East journal of digestive diseases. 2010 Jan;2(1):9.
20. Su MY, Chiu CT, Wu CS, Ho YP, Lien JM, Tung SY, Chen PC. Endoscopic hemorrhoidal ligation of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2003 Dec 1;58(6):871-4.
21. Coulom P. Nonsurgical therapy of hemorrhoids. Gastroentérologie Clinique et Biologique. 2009 Sep 16;33(10-11 Suppl):F20-6.
22. Komborozos VA, Skrekas GJ, Pissiotis CA. Rubber band ligation of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids: results of 500 cases. Digestive surgery. 2000 Mar 6;17(1):71-6.
23. Gupta PJ. Radiofrequency coagulation versus rubber band ligation in early hemorrhoids: pain versus gain. Medicina (Kaunas). 2004 Jan 1;40(3):232-7