IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF HER2, KI-67, AND P53 IN VARIOUS HISTOLOGICAL GRADES OF BREAST CARCINOMA IN LOCAL POPULATION
Main Article Content
Keywords
Breast carcinoma, HER2, Ki-67, P53, Histological Grades, Immunohistochemistry, Biomarkers, Prognostic Value
Abstract
Background: Breast carcinoma has continued to be one of the common types of cancer prevalent and deadly in the world. Breast tumour grading with histologic techniques is very important in prognosis as well as the management of the patients. These proteins include HER2, Ki-67, and P53 which have been identified to have important roles in the breast carcinomas biological behaviour. HER2 is a growth factor receptor, Ki-67 is proliferation index of the tumor and P53 is a tumor suppressive gene. Such markers may be beneficial while evaluating the tumour’s aggressiveness and the patient’s prognosis. Hence, it is important that more localized analysis is done for breast cancer especially since its biology exhibits a diverse feature in different ethnic community.
Aim: The specific aim of this study is as follows: To determine the level of HER2, Ki-67 and P53 in different histological grades of breast carcinoma prevalent in a local population. The secondary aim is, therefore, to compare the normal and cancer cells and also their biomarker scores with the histological grades in order to evaluate their prognostic significance.
Method: This paperwork is a type of research known as retrospective cohort study carried out over a period of two years. Patients included in the study were female patients diagnosed with breast carcinoma in whom surgery was carried out in form of excision or biopsy. Blood samples were taken; tissue samples were resected and prepared, using conventional histopathological methods. Immunohistochemistry for HER2, Ki-67, and P53 markers were done using anti-HER, Ki-67, and anti-p53 antibodies respectively, and standard operating procedures of immunohistochemistry staining method were followed. Assessment of the immunohistochemical staining was done according to previously described measurements. In data collection, Focus group discussion was conducted and follow-up measurements were made on the quantitative data using chi square and ANOVA test where probity was kept at p < 0. 05.
Results: Details of patients’ demographics and clinical profiles clearly reflected a cross-sectional representation of the study population. According to the classification, tumors were placed into the groups by size, stage, and spread of lymph nodes. These included HER2 overexpression more often in high grade tumours, rising levels of Ki-67 with grade and P53 mutation more commonly in advanced disease. The above biomarkers were strongly associated with histological grades. HER2 and Ki-67 receptor markers were directly related to poor prognosis and high recurrence while P53 mutations showed aggressive behaviour of tumor. In multivariate analysis, the authors confirmed the independence of biomarkers proved to be significant.
Conclusion: The alterations of HER2, Ki-67, and P53 are directly associated with the grades of breast carcinoma and these changes are useful for prognosis of the diseases. : Hence, it is recommended that integration of HER2, Ki-67, and P53 in diagnostic procedures to enhance the accuracy of assessments to support the development of targeted therapies. Continuity of such investigations and confirmations will be needed to progress the utilization of these biomarkers in the management of breast carcinoma.
References
2. J. Zhao, "HER2 immunohistochemistry staining positivity is strongly predictive of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 positive breast cancer," Pathology - Research and Practice, vol. 216, no. 11, p. 153155, 2020.
3. M. M. Bahaddin, "A comparative study between Ki67 positive versus Ki67 negative females with breast cancer: Cross sectional study," Annals of Medicine and Surgery, vol. 60, pp. 232-235, 2020.
4. N. Harbeck, "Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy for high-risk early breast cancer: updated efficacy and Ki-67 analysis from the monarchE study," Annals of Oncology, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1571-1581, 2021.
5. F. Maranta, "Do YOU know the Ki-67 index of your breast cancer patients? Knowledge of your institution’s Ki-67 index distribution and its robustness is essential for decision-making in early breast cancer," The Breast, vol. 51, pp. 20-126, 2020.
6. S. U. Baskota, "Prosigna® breast cancer assay: histopathologic correlation, development, and assessment of size, nodal status, Ki-67 (SiNK™) index for breast cancer prognosis," Modern Pathology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 70-76, 2021.
7. D. S. C. Vieira, "Analysis of Ki-67 expression in women with breast cancer: Comparative evaluation of two different methodologies by immunophenotyping," Pathology - Research and Practice, vol. 230, p. 153750, 2022.
8. P. Sali, "Identification of Luminal Subtypes of Breast Carcinoma Using Surrogate Immunohistochemical Markers and Ascertaining Their Prognostic Relevance," Clinical Breast Cancer, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 382-389, 2020.
9. Y. Wang, "Correlation analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient value and P53 and Ki-67 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma," Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 68, pp. 183-189, 2020.
10. W. L. MD, "Preoperative Prediction of Ki-67 Status in Breast Cancer with Multiparametric MRI Using Transfer Learning," Academic Radiology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. e44-e53, 2021.
11. Z. Song, "Changes in Ki-67 in Residual Tumor and Outcome of Primary Inflammatory Breast Cancer Treated With Trimodality Therapy," Clinical Breast Cancer, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. e655-e663, 2022.
12. H. Afkari, "Correlation between ER, PR, HER-2, and Ki-67 with the risk of bone metastases detected by bone scintigraphy in breast cancer patients: A cross sectional study," Annals of Medicine and Surgery, vol. 67, p. 102532, 2021.
13. S. Zhou, "Intense basolateral membrane staining indicates HER2 positivity in invasive micropapillary breast carcinoma," Modern Pathology, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1275-1286, 2020.
14. [14]
15. H. Zhang, "HER2-low breast cancers: incidence, HER2 staining patterns, clinicopathologic features, MammaPrint and BluePrint genomic profiles," Modern Pathology, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1075-1082, 2022.
16. S. Wopereis, "Evaluation of ER, PR and HER2 markers by flow cytometry for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis," Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 523, pp. 504-512, 2021.
17. X. He, "Differences in tumour heterogeneity based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI between tumour and peritumoural stroma for predicting Ki-67 status of invasive ductal carcinoma," Clinical Radiology, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 470.e13-470.e22, 2021.
18. K. Almstedt, "Long-term prognostic significance of HER2-low and HER2-zero in node-negative breast cancer," European Journal of Cancer, vol. 173, pp. 10-19, 2022.
19. W. Qiao, "Pathological complete response and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-low breast cancer," Annals of Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 64, p. 152125, 2023.