MEASURING THE SIDE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ROOT CANAL IRRIGATING SOLUTIONS ON BULK-FILL COMPOSITE BONDING TO CORONAL TOOTH STRUCTURE BY MICRO-TENSILE BOND STRENGTH EVALUATION
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
Aim: To measure the bad effects of different root canal irrigating solutions on bulk-fill composite bonding to coronal tooth structure by Micro-tensile bond strength evaluation.
Method: 15 human permanent lower molars were selected for the present study. To standardize, every tooth has decoronated to 4 mm coronal to cementoenamel junction using diamond disc bur for standardization, and making sure that the hight of the pulp chambers wall is 3mm from pulp chamber floor. All teeth prepared by ProTaper rotary instruments up to size F3, ProTaper obturators #F3 were used to fill the root canals and resin sealer (ADSEAL) were used for filling the canals via the lateral condensation method. 2 mm apically of the coronal gutta percha was removed to make a space for liner material. Glass ionomer restorative was used as liner material over the gutta percha to the level pulp chamber floor. The obturated teeth were then randomized divided into three identical test groups Group A (Sodium hypochlorite), Group B (Chlorhexidinle), and Group C (EDTA) of 5 molars each in accordance with the final irrigation solution used in the pulp chamber. Each test group was received 1ml from the tested irrigation solution according to the groups for 1minute and received ultra sonic irrigation for 20 seconds. These steps were repeated 4 times to reach 5 minutes final. then pulp chamber walls irrigated by saline for 1 minutes. The dentin surface was coated with a self-etch adhesive technique. A 3mm Single layer of composite resin 3M™ Filtek™ One Bulk Fill Restorative were bonded on the treated dentin surfaces. Micro-tensile bond strength test was used to measure the bond strength of bulk-fill composite bonding to coronal tooth structures.
Results: The highest mean value of micro tensile bond strength was recorded in group B (Chlorhexidine) 19.80 ± 1.42 with statistically significant difference (P value = 0.015) in comparing with the other two test groups, the group A (Sodium hypochlorite) recorded 14.38 ± 0.91, while group C (EDTA) recorded the lowest values of micro tensile bond strength 12.95 ± 1.38.
Conclusion: Chlorhexidine has less hazards effects on Micro-tensile bond strength of composite bond to coronal dentine when comparing to Sodium hypochlorite and EDTA.
References
2. Belli S, Zhang Y, Pereira PN, Ozer F, Pashley DH. Regional bond strengths of adhesive resins to pulp chamber dentin. J Endod 2001; 27:527- 532.
3. Belli S, Zhang Y, Pereira PN, Pashley DH. Adhesive sealing of pulp chamber. J Endod 2001; 27:521- 526.
4. Galavan RR Jr, West LA, Leiwhr FR, Pashley DH. Coronal microleakage of five materials used to create an intracoronal seal in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2002; 28: 59- 61.
5. Haugen, H.J.; Marovic, D.; Par, M.; Thieu, M.K.L.; Reseland, J.E.; Johnsen, G.F. Bulk Fill Composites Have Similar Performance to Conventional Dental Composites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5136.
6. Pameijer CH, Zmener O. Resin material for root canal obturation. Dent Clin North Am 2010; 54:325-44.
7. De Assis DF, Prado MD, Simão RA. Evaluation of the interaction between endodontic sealers and dentin treated with different irrigant solutions. J Endod 2011; 37:1550-2.
8. Cha HS, Shin DH. Antibacterial capacity of cavity disinfectants against Streptococcus mutans and their effects on shear bond strength of a self-etch adhesive. Dent Mater J 2016; 35:147-152.
9. Fawzi EM, Elkassas DW, Ghoneim AG. Bonding strategies to pulp chamber dentin treated with different endodontic irrigants: micro shear bond strength testing and SEM analysis. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12:63-70.
10. Carvalho MPM, Morari VHC, Susin AH, Rocha RO, Valandro LF, Soares FZM. Endodontic irrigation protocols: effects on bonding of adhesive system to coronal enamel and dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017; 29:222-228.
11. Cecchin D, Farina AP, Galafassi D, Barbizam JV, Corona SA, Carlini-Júnior B. Influence of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA on the micro tensile bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system. J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18:385-389.
12. Jain G, Rajkumar B, Boruah LC, Bedi RS. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of a dual-cure core build-up composite bonded to dentin using three different self-etch dentin bonding systems - An in-vitro study. J Dent Specialities 2018; 6:160-5.
13. Singh, R., Chaudhary, S., Manuja, N., Chaitra, T., and Sinha, A. Evaluation of Different Root Canal Obturation Methods in Primary Teeth Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography. Clin Ped Dent J. 2015; 39(5):462-469.
14. Tsai YL, Nakajima M, Wang CY, Foxton RM, Lin CP, Tagami J. Influence of etching ability of one-step self-etch adhesives on bonding to sound and non-carious cervical sclerotic dentin. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(6):941.
15. Coelho Santos MJ, Navarro MF, Tam L, Mccomb D. The effect of dentin adhesive and cure mode on film thickness and micro tensile bond strength to dentin in indirect restorations. Oper Dent. 2005;30(1):50.
16. Hardan, L., Bourgi, R., Cuevas-Suárez, C.E., Zarow, M., Kharouf, N., Mancino, D., Villares, C.F., Skaba, D., Lukomska-Szymanska, M. The Bond Strength and Antibacterial Activity of the Universal Dentin Bonding System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1230.
17. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Effect of cross-sectional surface area on bond strengths between resin and dentin. Dent Mater. 1998;14(2):120.
18. Carrilho M, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Yiu C, Pashley DH. Durability of resindentin bonds related to water and oil storage. Am J Dent. 2005;18(6):315-9.
19. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Kaga M, Oguchi H. In vitro degradation of resin–dentin bonds analysed by micro tensile bond test, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Biomaterials. 2003;24(21):3795-803.
20. Pashley DH, Tay F, Yiu C, Hashimoto M, Breschi L, Carvalho R, Ito S. Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res. 2004;83(3):216 – 21.
21. Hebling J, Pashley DH, Tjäderhane L, Tay F. Chlorhexidine arrests subclinical degradation of dentin hybrid layers in vivo. J Dent Res. 2005;84(8):741-6.
22. Carrilho M, Carvalho R, De Goes M, Di Hipolito V, Geraldeli S, Tay F, Pashley DH, Tjäderhane L. Chlorhexidine preserves dentin bond in vitro. J Dent Res. 2007;86(1):90-4.
23. Ishizuka T, Kataoka H, Yoshioka T, Hideaki S, Iwasaki N, Takahashi H, Nishimura F. Effect of NaClO treatment on bonding to root canal dentin using a new evaluation method. Dent Mater J. 2001;20(1):24-33.
24. Holleman A, Wiberg E. Inorganic Chemistry, Academic Press. Berlin/New York. 2001.
25. Erdemir A, Eldeniz AU, Belli S, Pashley DH. Effect of solvents on bonding to root canal dentin. J Endod. 2004;30(8):589-92.
26. Shinohara MS, Bedran-de-Castro AKB, Amaral CM, Pimenta LAF. The effect of sodium hypochlorite on microleakage of composite resin restorations using three adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 2004.
27. Morris MD, Lee K-W, Agee KA, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH. Effects of sodium hypochlorite and RC-prep on bond strengths of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod. 2001;27(12):753-7.
28. Correr GM, Puppin-Rontani RM, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MC, Consani S. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on dentin bonding in primary teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2004.
29. Wachlarowicz AJ, Joyce AP, Roberts S, Pashley DH. Effect of endodontic irrigants on the shear bond strength of epiphany sealer to dentin. J Endod. 2007;33(2):152-5.
30. Bohrer TC, Fontana PE, Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, Rocha RO. Can Endodontic Irrigating Solutions Influence the Bond Strength of Adhesives to Coronal Dental Substrates? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(6):481-494.