NAVIGATING THE TRANSITION TO MODULAR CURRICULA CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR FACULTY: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Modular curricula, faculty experiences, curriculum transition, challenges, opportunities
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigates faculty experiences during the transition to modular curricula at Gandhara University, Peshawar, emphasizing challenges and opportunities encountered in this process.
Objective: The objective is to examine faculty familiarity with modular curricula, participation in curriculum development, perceived training adequacy, and their perceptions of challenges and opportunities.
Methodology: Eighty faculty members participated in a three-month cross-sectional study that collected information on their demographics, familiarity with modular curricula, involvement in development, training adequacy, and perceived opportunities and challenges. Relationships between variables were investigated using statistical methods such as chi-square and ANOVA tests.
Results: The results show that while academics recognize the potential advantages of modular curriculum, such improved interdisciplinary teaching and alignment with business objectives, they also encounter major obstacles, such curriculum revision and technology uptake. Remarkably, one-quarter of the participants thought the instruction was insufficient. Engagement of faculty members in curriculum creation was favorably connected with familiarity with modular curricula. Sufficient training made a big difference in how difficult the change was seen to be.
Conclusion: Modular curriculum implementation done well needs faculty participation, sufficient training, and continuous support. The paper emphasizes the importance of focused training courses and further investigation to evaluate the long-term effects of modular curricula on learning outcomes.
References
2. Duby Z, Jonas K, Bunce B, Bergh K, Maruping K, Fowler C, Reddy T, Govindasamy D, Mathews C. Navigating education in the context of COVID-19 lockdowns and school closures: challenges and resilience among adolescent girls and young women in South Africa. InFrontiers in Education 2022 Mar 7 (Vol. 7, p. 856610). Frontiers Media SA.
3. Kumar SA, Niveditha G, Seema P, Bengalorkar GM. Usage of learning management system to implement online teaching methodology in undergraduate medical students: A cross sectional study. Clinical Dermatology Review. 2022 Jul 1;6(2):149.
4. Zhang Z, Hu Q, Xu C, Zhou J, Li J. Medical teachers' affective domain teaching dilemma and path exploration: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):883.
5. Aldhahi MI, Alqahtani AS, Baattaiah BA, Al-Mohammed HI. Exploring the relationship between students' learning satisfaction and self-efficacy during the emergency transition to remote learning amid the coronavirus pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Education and information technologies. 2022 Jan;27(1):1323-40.
6. Islam H, Muhammed MN, Lakshmi S, Kapoor A, Jahan A, Doddamani A, Kamath N, Ehsan M, Nair S. Perception and attitude towards online clinical modules: a cross-sectional study among medical students from two countries. F1000Research. 2023;12.
7. D'Souza PJ, Assariparambil AR, Muthamilselvi G, Joseph VM, George LS. Pandemic Pedagogy: Perception of Nursing students’: A cross-sectional study. F1000Research. 2022;11.
8. Datar U, Desai KM, Kamat MS. COVID-19 and virtual learning in dentistry: Perspective on challenges and opportunities. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2021 Jan 1;10(1).
9. Butial FJ, Santos MD, Juanito J, Francisco JM, Abequibel B, Deran JJ, Toribio C, Alieto EO. Modular Teaching during Tumultuous Times: Challenges and Coping Strategies of Special Education Teachers. Special Education. 2022 Jan 1;1(43).
10. Dejene W. The practice of modularized curriculum in higher education institution: Active learning and continuous assessment in focus. Cogent Education. 2019 Jan 1;6(1):Research-Article.
11. Baran E, AlZoubi D. Human-centered design as a frame for transition to remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 2020;28(2):365-72.
12. Cairns JG, Hervey T, Johnson O. Neither ‘bolt-on’nor ‘built-in’: benefits and challenges of developing an integrated skills curriculum through a partnership model. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. 2018;13.
13. Dill-McFarland KA, König SG, Mazel F, Oliver DC, McEwen LM, Hong KY, Hallam SJ. An integrated, modular approach to data science education in microbiology. PLoS computational biology. 2021 Feb 25;17(2):e1008661.
14. Aziz S, Wajid G, Khan RA, Zaidi FZ. Dimensions of challenges in transformation from traditional to integrated modular curriculum-Experiences from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023 Nov;39(6):1730.
15. Waqar T, Khaliq T. Integrated-modular system for under graduate medical students: faculty’s perception. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2019 Jun 25;69(3):465-71.
16. Fay M, Barnett E, Chavarín O. How states are implementing transition curricula: Results from a national scan.
17. Dejene W. The practice of modularized curriculum in higher education institution: Active learning and continuous assessment in focus. Cogent Education. 2019 Jan 1;6(1):Research-Article.
18. Costich M, Finkel MA, Friedman S, Catallozzi M, Gordon RJ. Transition-to-residency: pilot innovative, online case-based curriculum for medical students preparing for pediatric internships. Medical Education Online. 2021 Jan 1;26(1):1892569.
19. ur Rahman I, Mansoor S, Meraj L, Ahmad M, Dodhy MA, Sattar H. Faculty Satisfication Regarding Modular Teaching. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College. 2022 Mar 31;26(1).
20. Ahmad RN, Bhatti MM, Khan AH. Teaching pathology to medical undergraduates in an integrated modular curriculum. Pakistan Journal of Pathology. 2018 Jun 11;29(1):17-21.