COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS OF ULTRASOUND-LASER AND TENS-LASER THERAPY IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS MANAGEMENT

Main Article Content

Hiba Sultan
Farah Shaheen
Alisha Ehsan
Sana Ashraf
Khalid Abbas
Anam Bint Irfan Akbar

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis, Ultrasound Therapy, Low-Level Laser Therapy, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, WOMAC Index, Range of Motion, Pain Management, Physiotherapy Modalities, Non-Pharmacological Treatment

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease that predominantly affects the geriatric population, leading to pain, functional limitations, and decreased range of motion. Physiotherapy modalities such as Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) have been used for managing OA, but comparative studies of these modalities in combination with ultrasound are limited.


Objective: To determine the efficacy of Ultrasound-LASER (US+LASER) and TENS-LASER (TENS+LASER) therapies in managing knee osteoarthritis, focusing on improvements in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, flexion range of motion (ROM), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores.


Methods: This quasi-experimental study included 40 patients with knee osteoarthritis, randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (US+LASER) and Group B (TENS+LASER). Group A received 5 minutes of ultrasound followed by 8 minutes of LASER therapy, while Group B received 20 minutes of TENS followed by 8 minutes of LASER therapy. Both groups performed specific knee osteoarthritis exercises during the treatment period. Data on WOMAC scores, flexion ROM, and VAS scores were collected at baseline and after four weeks of treatment. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25.


Results: Group A showed a significant reduction in WOMAC scores from 71.05 ± 12.02 to 29.15 ± 8.37, while Group B's scores decreased from 67.05 ± 12.66 to 47.25 ± 12.25 (p<0.001). Flexion ROM improved from 83.50 ± 17.33 degrees to 119.50 ± 2.24 degrees in Group A and from 82.00 ± 12.40 degrees to 102.75 ± 10.06 degrees in Group B (p<0.001). VAS scores decreased from 8.45 ± 1.43 to 1.95 ± 1.39 in Group A and from 8.40 ± 1.43 to 4.30 ± 1.08 in Group B (p<0.001).


Conclusion: Ultrasound-LASER therapy is more effective than TENS-LASER therapy in reducing pain and improving knee function in patients with osteoarthritis. The study supports the use of Ultrasound-LASER therapy as a preferred treatment option for knee osteoarthritis due to its superior efficacy and time efficiency.

Abstract 450 | pdf Downloads 138

References

1. Huang Z, Chen J, Ma J, Shen B, Pei F, Kraus VB. Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2015 Sep;23(9):1437-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.04.005.
2. Hsu H, Siwiec RM. Knee Osteoarthritis. NIH. 2019. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507884/
3. Afzali T, Fangel MV, Vestergaard AS, Rathleff MS, Ehlers LH, Jensen MB. Cost-Effectiveness of Treatments for Non-Osteoarthritic Knee Pain Conditions: A Systematic Review. PLOS ONE. 2018 Dec;13(12) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209240.
4. de Almeida CC, da Silva VZM, Júnior GC, Liebano RE, Durigan JLQ. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Interferential Current Demonstrate Similar Effects in Relieving Acute and Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2018 Sep;22(5):347-354. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.12.005.
5. Atamaz FC, Durmus D, Baydar M, Demircioglu OY, Kuran B, Oncel S. Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Interferential Currents, and Shortwave Diathermy in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2012 May;93(5):748-756. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.012.
6. Bennell K, Dobson F, Hinman R. Measures of Physical Performance Assessments: Self-Paced Walk Test (SPWT), Stair Climb Test (SCT), Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Chair Stand Test (CST), Timed Up & Go (TUG), Sock Test, Lift and Carry Test (LCT), and Car Task. Arthritis Care & Research. 2011 Nov;63(S11). doi: 10.1002/acr.20538.
7. Bjordal JM, Johnson MI, Lopes-Martins RA, Bogen B, Chow R, Ljunggren AE. Short-Term Efficacy of Physical Interventions in Osteoarthritic Knee Pain. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trials. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2007 Jun;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-51.
8. Cerritelli F, Verzella M, Cicchitti L, D’Alessandro G, Vanacore N. The Paradox of Sham Therapy and Placebo Effect in Osteopathy. Medicine. 2016 Aug;95(35) doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000004728.
9. Chen AT, Shrestha S, Collins JE, Sullivan JK, Losina E, Katz JN. Estimating Contextual Effect in Nonpharmacological Therapies for Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Analytic Review. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2020 Sep;28(9):1154-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.05.007.
10. Chen CC, Johnson MI. An Investigation Into the Hypoalgesic Effects of High- and Low-Frequency Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Experimentally-Induced Blunt Pressure Pain in Healthy Human Participants. The Journal of Pain. 2010 Jan;11(1):53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.05.008.
11. Chen CC, Johnson MI, McDonough S, Cramp F. The Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Local and Distal Cutaneous Blood Flow Following a Prolonged Heat Stimulus in Healthy Subjects. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. 2007 May;27(3):154-161. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.2007.00731.x.
12. Chen LX, Zhou ZR, Li YL, Lin J, Chen RC. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2016 Feb;32(2):146-154. doi: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000233.
13. Amid R, Kadkhodazadeh M, Ahsaie MG, Hakakzadeh A. Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy on Proliferation and Differentiation of the Cells Contributing in Bone Regeneration. Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences. 2014;5(4):163-170. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4281990/
14. Longo L, Evangelista S, Tinacci G, Sesti AG. Effect of Diodes-Laser Silver Arsenide-Aluminium (Ga-Al-As) 904 nm on Healing of Experimental Wounds. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 1987;7(5):444-447. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900070513.
15. Almeida-Lopes L, Lopes A, Tunér J, Calderhead RG. Infrared Diode Laser Therapy-Induced Lymphatic Drainage for Inflammation in the Head and Neck. Laser Therapy. 2005;14(2):67-74. doi: 10.5978/islsm.14.67.
16. van Breugel HH, Bär PR. Power Density and Exposure Time of He-Ne Laser Irradiation Are More Important Than Total Energy Dose in Photo-Biomodulation of Human Fibroblasts in Vitro. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 1992;12(5):528-537. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900120512.
17. Tascioglu F, Kuzgun S, Armagan O, Ogutler G. Short-Term Effectiveness of Ultrasound Therapy in Knee Osteoarthritis. Journal of International Medical Research. 2010 Aug;38(4):1233-1242. doi: 10.1177/147323001003800404