EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PATTERN OF MANDIBULAR FRACTURES IN ISLAMABAD
Main Article Content
Keywords
Mandibular fractures, parasymphysis, Road Traffic Accidents (RTA), Maxillofacial trauma, Etiology, Site of fracture
Abstract
Introduction: In the realm of maxillofacial injuries, trauma stands out as the primary cause, with mandibular fracture being the second most prevalent type. Mandibular fractures represent a significant portion of cases involving facial trauma. The primary culprits behind facial fractures are high-impact incidents such as motor vehicle accidents, physical altercations, sports-related injuries, and work-related mishaps. Depending on the severity of the trauma endured, mandibular fractures can affect a single site or involve multiple anatomical sites simultaneously. Individuals who have sustained a fracture in the lower jaw frequently encounter sensations of pain, discomfort, challenges with communication, and eating, as well as noticeable changes in appearance and aesthetic deformity. These types of injuries also carry psychological implications and come with associated financial burdens.
Aim: The aim of this research is to evaluate the epidemiology and fracture patterns associated with mandibular fractures in the region of Islamabad.
Methodology: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in Islamabad, with a sample size of 170 patients determined using the WHO sample calculator. The sampling technique employed was non-probability consecutive sampling. A comprehensive case history was recorded by conducting both clinical and radiological examinations, including PA Face and OPG's (Orthopantomogram). The collected data were meticulously analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 for statistical analysis.
Results: Among the 170 patients included in the study, the highest percentage of mandibular fractures occurred in individuals aged 18 to 30 years, with males accounting for 88.2% of the cases and females comprising only 11.2% of the population. Road traffic accidents were identified as the leading cause of mandibular fractures, representing 64.1% of the cases. The most common site of fracture was the para symphysis, observed in 16.5% of the patients. When examining combined fracture sites, the combination of the para symphysis and the angle of the mandible was the most frequent, accounting for 10% of cases.
Conclusion: The leading cause of mandibular fractures and trauma was road traffic accidents (RTA). Mandibular fractures were more prevalent in men than women, with the majority of patients falling within the 18-30 age range. The parasymphysis emerged as the most common location for fractures, and in cases where fractures were concurrent, the parasymphysis and the mandibular angle exhibited the highest occurrence. There was a significant correlation between the type of injury mechanism and the precise anatomical site of the fracture. Understanding these associations is crucial for surgeons to determine the appropriate and timely management of mandibular fractures.
References
2. Diab J, Flapper WJ, Anderson PJ, Moore MH. Patterns of mandibular fractures in South Australia: epidemiology, treatment, and clinical outcomes. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2022 Jun 1;33(4):1018-22.
3. Lin FY, Wu CI, Cheng HT. Mandibular fracture patterns at a medical center in central Taiwan: a 3-year epidemiological review. Medicine. 2017 Dec;96(51).
4. Lee KH. Epidemiology of mandibular fractures in a tertiary trauma center. Emergency medicine journal. 2008 Sep 1;25(9):565-8.
5. Rashid S, Kundi JA, Sarfaraz A, Qureshi AU, Khan A. Patterns of mandibular fractures and associated comorbidities in Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Cureus. 2019 Sep 25;11(9).
6. Natu SS, Pradhan H, Gupta H, Alam S, Gupta S, Pradhan R, Mohammad S, Kohli M, Sinha VP, Shankar R, Agarwal A. An epidemiological study on pattern and incidence of mandibular fractures. Plastic surgery international. 2012;2012.
7. Nardi C, Vignoli C, Pietragalla M, Tonelli P, Calistri L, Franchi L, Preda L, Colagrande S. Imaging of mandibular fractures: a pictorial review. Insights into imaging. 2020 Feb 19;11(1):30.
8. Natu SS, Pradhan H, Gupta H, Alam S, Gupta S, Pradhan R, Mohammad S, Kohli M, Sinha VP, Shankar R, Agarwal A. An epidemiological study on pattern and incidence of mandibular fractures. Plastic surgery international. 2012;2012.
9. Edwards TJ, David DJ, Simpson DA, Abbott AA. Patterns of mandibular fractures in Adelaide, South Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 1994 May;64(5):307-11.
10. Halazonetis JA. The 'weak regions of the mandible. British Journal of Oral Surgery. 1968 Jan 1;6(1):37-48.
11. Mijiti A, Ling W, Tuerdi M, Maimaiti A, Tuerxun J, Tao YZ, Saimaiti A, Moming A. Epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures treated at a university hospital, Xinjiang, China: a 5-year retrospective study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014 Apr 1;42(3):227-33.
12. Bonavolontà P, Orabona GD, Abbate V, Vaira LA, Faro CL, Petrocelli M, Attanasi F, De Riu G, Iaconetta G, Califano L. The epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures in Italy: the experience of a single tertiary center with 1720 patients. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017 Aug 1;45(8):1319-26.
13. Ragupathy K, Pasupathy S. Incidence, etiology and pattern of mandibular fractures in Pondicherry. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2015 Dec 28;4(104):16946-51.
14. Dongas P, Hall GM. Mandibular fracture patterns in Tasmania, Australia. Australian dental journal. 2002 Jun;47(2):131-7.
15. Al Ahmed HE, Jaber MA, Fanas SH, Karas M. The pattern of maxillofacial fractures in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates: a review of 230 cases. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2004 Aug 1;98(2):166-70.
16. Brasileiro BF, Passeri LA. Epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures in Brazil: a 5-year prospective study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2006 Jul 1;102(1):28-34.
17. Eskitaşcıoğlu T, Öyazgan İ, Çoruh A, Günay GK, Yontar Y, Altıpamak M. Fractures of the mandible: a 20-year retrospective analysis of 753 patients.
18. Bither S, Mahindra U, Halli R, Kini Y. Incidence and pattern of mandibular fractures in rural population: a review of 324 patients at a tertiary hospital in Loni, Maharashtra, India. Dental Traumatology. 2008 Aug;24(4):468-70.
19. Gadicherla S, Sasikumar P, Gill SS, Bhagania M, Kamath AT, Pentapati KC. Mandibular fractures and associated factors at a tertiary care hospital. Archives of trauma research. 2016 Dec;5(4).
20. Sakr K, Farag IA, Zeitoun IM. Review of 509 mandibular fractures treated at the University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2006 Apr 1;44(2):107-11.
21. Atilgan S, Erol B, Yaman F, Yilmaz N, Ucan MC. Mandibular fractures: a comparative analysis between young and adult patients in the southeast region of Turkey. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2010;18:17-22.
22. Sardar T, Ullah U, Khan A, Shah Z, Iqbal A, Afsar H. Patterns and treatment modalities of maxillofacial fractures due to motorcycle accidents. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2022 Jun 16;16(05):630-.