THE INTEGRATION OF TECHNOLOGY AND INTERDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATION IN HEALTHCARE SETTINGS TO IMPROVE PATIENT CARE OUTCOMES AND OPTIMIZE OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY
Main Article Content
Keywords
technology integration, interdisciplinary collaboration, healthcare settings, patient care outcomes, operational efficiency, multidisciplinary approach
Abstract
In recent years, the healthcare industry has witnessed a significant transformation driven by the integration of technology and interdisciplinary collaboration. This review article explores the impact of leveraging technology and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration in healthcare settings to enhance patient care outcomes and streamline operational efficiency. The integration of technological advancements such as electronic health records, telemedicine, wearable devices, and artificial intelligence has revolutionized the way healthcare providers deliver care and interact with patients. Furthermore, interdisciplinary collaboration among healthcare professionals from various specialties has proven to be crucial in addressing complex patient needs and ensuring comprehensive care delivery.This review synthesizes existing literature on the benefits and challenges associated with the integration of technology and interdisciplinary collaboration in healthcare settings. It highlights the positive outcomes of adopting a multidisciplinary approach, including improved patient outcomes, enhanced care coordination, and increased operational efficiency. Moreover, the review discusses the potential barriers to successful implementation, such as data security concerns, interoperability issues, and resistance to change among healthcare professionals.
References
2. Alkureishi, M. A., Lee, W. W., Lyons, M., Press, V. G., Imam, S., Nkansah-Amankra, A., & ... Arora, V. M. (2016). Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient-Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 31(5), 548-560.
3. Buntin, M. B., Burke, M. F., Hoaglin, M. C., & Blumenthal, D. (2011). The benefits of health information technology: A review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Affairs, 30(3), 464-471.
4. Cresswell, K., & Sheikh, A. (2013). Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: An interpretative review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(5), e73-e86.
5. Greenhalgh, T., Potts, H. W., Wong, G., Bark, P., & Swinglehurst, D. (2009). Tensions and Paradoxes in Electronic Patient Record Research: A Systematic Literature Review Using the Meta-narrative Method. The Milbank Quarterly, 87(4), 729-788.
6. Hsiao, C. J., Hing, E., Socey, T. C., & Cai, B. (2010). Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2011. NCHS Data Brief, (79), 1-8.
7. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academies Press.
8. Jha, A. K., Doolan, D., Grandt, D., Scott, T., & Bates, D. W. (2008). The use of health information technology in seven nations. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(1), 1-4.
9. Kellermann, A. L., & Jones, S. S. (2013). What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology. Health Affairs, 32(1), 63-68.
10. Loomis, G. A., Ries, J. S., Saywell, R. M., Thakker, N. R., & Sumner, W. (2002). If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them? Journal of Family Practice, 51(7), 636-641.
11. Ludwick, D. A., & Doucette, J. (2009). Primary care physicians' experience with electronic medical records: Barriers to implementation in a fee-for-service environment. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, 2009, 1-9.
12. Maffei, R. J., & Moyer, C. A. (2016). Beyond the Electronic Medical Record: A Physician's Guide to Population Health Management Tools and Technologies. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 31(6), 679-682.
13. Menachemi, N., & Collum, T. H. (2011). Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 4, 47-55.
14. Miller, R. H., & Sim, I. (2004). Physicians' use of electronic medical records: Barriers and solutions. Health Affairs, 23(2), 116-126.
15. Nambisan, P. (2011). Information seeking and social support in online health communities: Impact on patients' perceived empathy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(3), 298-304.
16. O'Malley, A. S., Grossman, J. M., Cohen, G. R., Kemper, N. M., Pham, H. H., & Landon, B. E. (2010). Are electronic medical records helpful for care coordination? Experiences of physician practices. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(3), 177-185.
17. Poon, E. G., Jha, A. K., Christino, M., Honour, M. M., Fernandopulle, R., Middleton, B., & ... Kaushal, R. (2006). Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: A snapshot. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6(1), 1-10.
18. Ralston, J. D., Revere, D., & Robins, L. S. (2011). Provider perspectives on the value of health information exchange within organizations. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26(1), 44-49.
19. Sittig, D. F., & Singh, H. (2010). Legal, ethical, and financial dilemmas in electronic health record adoption and use. Pediatrics, 126(4), e1044-e1050.
20. Terry, A. L., Thorpe, C. F., Giles, G., Brown, J. B., & Harris, S. B. (2009). Implementing electronic health records: Key factors in primary care. Canadian Family Physician, 55(10), 1108-1111.
21. Thakkar, M., & Davis, D. C. (2006). Risks, barriers, and benefits of EHR systems: A comparative study based on size of hospital. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 3, 5.
22. Trafton, J., Martins, S., Michel, M., Lewis, E., Wang, D., Combs, A., & ... Stulbarg, M. (2010). Designing an automated clinical decision support system to match clinical practice guidelines for opioid therapy for chronic pain. Implementation Science, 5(1), 26.
23. Unertl, K. M., Novak, L. L., Johnson, K. B., & Lorenzi, N. M. (2012). Traversing the many paths of workflow research: Developing a conceptual framework of workflow terminology through a systematic literature review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19(3), 472-480.
24. Vawdrey, D. K., & Hripcsak, G. (2013). Publication bias in clinical trials of electronic health records. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 46(1), 139-141.
25. Wachter, R. M. (2016). Making IT work: Harnessing the power of health information technology to improve care in England. Report to the National Advisory Group on Health Information Technology in England.
26. Wang, S. J., Middleton, B., Prosser, L. A., Bardon, C. G., Spurr, C. D., Carchidi, P. J., & ... Bates, D. W. (2003). A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. American Journal of Medicine, 114(5), 397-403.
27. Weingart, S. N., Massagli, M., Cyrulik, A., Isaac, T., Morway, L., Sands, D. Z., & Weissman, J. S. (2009). Assessing the value of electronic prescribing in ambulatory care: A focus group study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(9), 571-578.
28. Wears, R. L., & Berg, M. (2005). Computer technology and clinical work: Still waiting for Godot. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(6), 615-622.
29. Wright, A., & Bates, D. W. (2010). Distribution of problems, medications and lab results in electronic health records: The Pareto principle at work. Applied Clinical Informatics, 1(1), 32-37.
30. Yaraghi, N., Du, A. Y., Sharman, R., & Gopal, R. D. (2015). The impact of health information exchange on healthcare delivery: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 75, 169-177.
31. Yoon-Flannery, K., Zandieh, S. O., Kuperman, G. J., Langsam, D. J., Hyman, D., & Kaushal, R. (2003). A qualitative analysis of an electronic health record (EHR) implementation in an academic ambulatory setting. Informatics in Primary Care, 11(3), 141-149.
32. Zheng, K., Padman, R., & Johnson, M. P. (2010). DiamondTouch: A multi-user touch technology for collaboration on wall-sized, high-resolution displays. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 701-710.
33. Zhou, L., Soran, C. S., Jenter, C. A., Volk, L. A., Orav, E. J., & Bates, D. W. (2009). The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(4), 457-464.
34. Zhu, X., & Dong, L. (2013). The impact of health information technology on collaborative chronic care management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 151-180.
35. Zhu, X., & Tim, L. (2012). The impact of health information technology on the quality of medical and health care: A systematic review. Health Information Management Journal, 41(2), 26-37.
36. Zlabek, J. A., Wickus, J. W., Mathiason, M. A., & Kofron, R. M. (2011). Relationship between implementation of a medical management system and physician satisfaction. Journal of Healthcare Management, 56(6), 395-409.
37. Zulman, D. M., Nazi, K. M., Turvey, C. L., Wagner, T. H., Woods, S. S., & An, L. C. (2011). Patient interest in sharing personal health record information: A web-based survey. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(12), 805-810.
38. Zwaanswijk, M., Verhaak, P. F., & Bensing, J. M. (2007). Communication in doctor-patient medical consultations: A review. Patient Education and Counseling, 65(3), 287-294.
39. Zwarenstein, M., Goldman, J., & Reeves, S. (2009). Interprofessional collaboration: Effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3), CD000072.
40. Zwicker, K., & Chetley, A. (2016). The Role of Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Guide for Health Professionals. Springer.